Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumThe right-wing threat to free speech
MinorIncursionHat Retweeted"Activists on the right have long been adept at using progressive theories of censorship to restrict the speech progressives would protect. Censorship has always been a bipartisan vice." https://spiked-online.com/2022/01/20/the-right-wing-threat-to-free-speech/#.YewnYB0ULG4.twitter Nice essay via Wendy Kaminer
@spikedonline
@spikedonline
Link to tweet
The right-wing threat to free speech
The Republican campaign against critical race theory has become dangerously censorious.
The Republican campaign against critical race theory has become dangerously censorious.
The right-wing threat to free speech
The Republican campaign against critical race theory has become dangerously censorious.
WENDY KAMINER
COLUMNIST
20th January 2022
{snip}
A plethora of pending and enacted red-state laws now ban the teaching of divisive concepts, barely defined, under the guise of banning so-called critical race theory. (Pen America produced a devastating report on these bills, which I discussed on spiked here.) ... Supported by right-wing book banners, like the deceptively named Moms for Liberty, these laws promise individual parents the power to ban books and lessons that offend them, and, in some cases, to initiate potentially lucrative private lawsuits against alleged offenders.
Consider this exemplary Oklahoma bill, opposed by the United States Free Speech Union (USFSU). It would allow any individual offended parent to remove books from public schools that make as their primary subject the study of sex, sexual preferences, sexual activity, sexual perversion, sex-based classifications, sexual identity, or gender identity. As USFSU senior fellow Jon Zobenica explains, this bill grants any and all Oklahoma parents and legal guardians veto power over which books may be stacked on the shelves of Oklahoma public-school libraries. It also provides swift and punitive consequences for non-compliance with parentally imposed bans.
Consider too the controversy over book banning in Virginia that helped elect the Trump-lite Republican, now governor, Glenn Youngkin. It arose from the efforts of one mother to ban Toni Morrisons novel Beloved because it allegedly gave her 17-year-old son nightmares. Former Democratic governor Terry McAuliffe was condemned for opposing her efforts and clumsily noting that parents shouldnt be telling schools what they should teach, a remark for which he was predictably and justly roasted. But it was taken out of context: he was referencing the effort of one parent not simply to excuse her own child from an allegedly nightmarish reading assignment, but to remove the offending book from the shelves, effectively dictating what other peoples children might read. As the offended mother acknowledged, I want to make sure every kid in the country is protected.
Dont be surprised at her arrogance in assuming she knew which books endangered every kid in the country. It is the arrogance of all censors, right and left, who aim to protect everyone from speech they dislike, or to protect themselves from the threats of opposing ideas. {snip} This isnt a freedom fight. Its a power grab.
Wendy Kaminer is an author, a lawyer and a former national board member of the American Civil Liberties Union.
To enquire about republishing spikeds content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan. viv.regan@spiked-online.com
The Republican campaign against critical race theory has become dangerously censorious.
WENDY KAMINER
COLUMNIST
20th January 2022
{snip}
A plethora of pending and enacted red-state laws now ban the teaching of divisive concepts, barely defined, under the guise of banning so-called critical race theory. (Pen America produced a devastating report on these bills, which I discussed on spiked here.) ... Supported by right-wing book banners, like the deceptively named Moms for Liberty, these laws promise individual parents the power to ban books and lessons that offend them, and, in some cases, to initiate potentially lucrative private lawsuits against alleged offenders.
Consider this exemplary Oklahoma bill, opposed by the United States Free Speech Union (USFSU). It would allow any individual offended parent to remove books from public schools that make as their primary subject the study of sex, sexual preferences, sexual activity, sexual perversion, sex-based classifications, sexual identity, or gender identity. As USFSU senior fellow Jon Zobenica explains, this bill grants any and all Oklahoma parents and legal guardians veto power over which books may be stacked on the shelves of Oklahoma public-school libraries. It also provides swift and punitive consequences for non-compliance with parentally imposed bans.
Consider too the controversy over book banning in Virginia that helped elect the Trump-lite Republican, now governor, Glenn Youngkin. It arose from the efforts of one mother to ban Toni Morrisons novel Beloved because it allegedly gave her 17-year-old son nightmares. Former Democratic governor Terry McAuliffe was condemned for opposing her efforts and clumsily noting that parents shouldnt be telling schools what they should teach, a remark for which he was predictably and justly roasted. But it was taken out of context: he was referencing the effort of one parent not simply to excuse her own child from an allegedly nightmarish reading assignment, but to remove the offending book from the shelves, effectively dictating what other peoples children might read. As the offended mother acknowledged, I want to make sure every kid in the country is protected.
Dont be surprised at her arrogance in assuming she knew which books endangered every kid in the country. It is the arrogance of all censors, right and left, who aim to protect everyone from speech they dislike, or to protect themselves from the threats of opposing ideas. {snip} This isnt a freedom fight. Its a power grab.
Wendy Kaminer is an author, a lawyer and a former national board member of the American Civil Liberties Union.
To enquire about republishing spikeds content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan. viv.regan@spiked-online.com
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1433 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The right-wing threat to free speech (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jan 2022
OP
So that same 43% of republicans would approve a democrat shutting down Fox news?
keithbvadu2
Jan 2022
#1
From the first two paragraphs: "Censorship has always been a bipartisan vice."
mahatmakanejeeves
Jan 2022
#2
keithbvadu2
(40,231 posts)1. So that same 43% of republicans would approve a democrat shutting down Fox news?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142128590
Freedom of the press may be guaranteed in the Constitution. But a plurality of Republicans want to give President Trump the authority to close down certain news outlets, according to a new public opinion survey conducted by Ipsos and provided exclusively to The Daily Beast.
So that same 43% of republicans would approve a democrat shutting down Fox news?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-poll-43-of-republicans-want-to-give-trump-the-power-to-shut-down-media?via=twitter_page
Freedom of the press may be guaranteed in the Constitution. But a plurality of Republicans want to give President Trump the authority to close down certain news outlets, according to a new public opinion survey conducted by Ipsos and provided exclusively to The Daily Beast.
So that same 43% of republicans would approve a democrat shutting down Fox news?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/new-poll-43-of-republicans-want-to-give-trump-the-power-to-shut-down-media?via=twitter_page
mahatmakanejeeves
(61,138 posts)2. From the first two paragraphs: "Censorship has always been a bipartisan vice."
So far the First Amendment has protected Americans from repressive hate-speech laws common in the UK and Western Europe, but the culture of censorship still thrives here. It owes much to the decades-long work of progressives who developed influential theories elevating the rights of offended listeners over the right to speak, and the right of the unoffended to hear.
But you cant copyright an idea, and activists on the right have long been adept at using progressive theories of censorship to restrict the speech progressives would protect. (Censorship has always been a bipartisan vice.) Thirty years ago, right-wingers parroted anti-porn feminists in their campaigns against sex education and information about reproductive choice. Today right-wing parent groups invoke offended-listener theories to remove books they dont like from public schools and libraries.
But you cant copyright an idea, and activists on the right have long been adept at using progressive theories of censorship to restrict the speech progressives would protect. (Censorship has always been a bipartisan vice.) Thirty years ago, right-wingers parroted anti-porn feminists in their campaigns against sex education and information about reproductive choice. Today right-wing parent groups invoke offended-listener theories to remove books they dont like from public schools and libraries.