Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumJustice Thomas uses his dissent in Counterman to reiterate his hatred of New York Times v. Sullivan
The First Amendment RetweetedIt's good to see the Supreme Court reaffirm protections against politicians and celebrities weaponizing defamation law to silence critics.
People like Thomas and Ron DeSantis are increasingly isolated in their efforts to upend these fundamental First Amendment protections.
People like Thomas and Ron DeSantis are increasingly isolated in their efforts to upend these fundamental First Amendment protections.
Justice Thomas uses his dissent in Counterman to reiterate his hatred of New York Times v. Sullivan, calling it a "flawed, policy-driven" decision "masquerading as constitutional law." No one joins him. https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-138_43j7.pdf
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2260 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Thomas uses his dissent in Counterman to reiterate his hatred of New York Times v. Sullivan (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2023
OP
And If One Speaks Of 'Policy-Driven Decisions Masquerading As Constitutional Law', Sir
The Magistrate
Jun 2023
#3
Clarence is "fishing" for cases again. I'm sure Leo and his pals will send him one.
Midnight Writer
Jun 2023
#5
Ocelot II
(120,815 posts)1. And he cited his own dissents as authority!
mahatmakanejeeves
(60,922 posts)2. Sigh. He always does. And good morning.
Full disclosure: IANAL.
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)3. And If One Speaks Of 'Policy-Driven Decisions Masquerading As Constitutional Law', Sir
There's nobody knows one better than old Clarence 'Unca Ruckus' Thomas. He hasn't made a decision wasn't one of those the whole time he's parked his worthless ass on a bench to masquerade as a judge.
LiberalFighter
(53,465 posts)4. Did his wife tell him what to write?
Midnight Writer
(22,971 posts)5. Clarence is "fishing" for cases again. I'm sure Leo and his pals will send him one.