Civil Liberties

Eugene

(62,687 posts) Thu Jan 23, 2014, 01:59 PM Jan 2014

Ohio judge favors camera speeding ticket refunds

Source: Associated Press

Ohio judge favors camera speeding ticket refunds

AP foreign, Thursday January 23 2014

DAN SEWELL

Associated Press= CINCINNATI (AP) — A judge in southwest Ohio says a Cincinnati-area village should refund speeding tickets from traffic cameras, but it can wait until after its appeal of class action-status is resolved.

Hamilton County Common Pleas Judge Robert Ruehlman (ROOHL'-muhn) ruled Thursday that Elmwood Place should pay back fines and fees totaling nearly $1.8 million. He says the village is also liable for attorney fees.

But he said he won't make a final order until the village's appeal of his approval of class-action status for thousands of ticketed motorists is decided.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ohio judge favors camera speeding ticket refunds (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2014 OP

yes, news rustbeltvoice Jan 2014 #1

newspaper.com robertacollier Jul 2014 #2

In Canada we had the camera recording system also maybe twenty years ago shockedcanadian Jul 2014 #3

rustbeltvoice

(448 posts)

1. yes, news

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Thu Jan 23, 2014, 02:21 PM

Jan 2014

A judge ruling against the police and government revenue collections will always be news, even if it is over ruled by a higher court or legislated over. There is always an upset quarter when a judge rules for equity, or with justice over power.

robertacollier

(5 posts)

2. newspaper.com

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Tue Jul 22, 2014, 02:16 PM

Jul 2014

Site I ran across addressing cameras. It addresses speed cameras and red light cameras. It lists a lot of stories about destruction of the cameras. A lot in Europe and some in the US.

www.thenewspaper.com

shockedcanadian

(751 posts)

3. In Canada we had the camera recording system also maybe twenty years ago

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Thu Jul 24, 2014, 05:49 AM

Jul 2014

And wouldn't you believe it, it was cancelled as many of the offending drivers were lawyers, judges and police (according to one newspaper report wish I wish I had kept). The reasoning behind scrapping the program was that it was an "invasion of privacy". Many were challenging the photograph results (saving the system millions in court costs in all honesty).

Reply to this discussion