Hillary apologizes for Nancy Reagan/AIDS comment
https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/708403247795539968/photo/1While the Reagans were strong advocates for stem cell research and finding a cure for Alzheimers, I misspoke about their record on HIV and AIDS. For that, I'm sorry.
elleng
(135,775 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,486 posts)"I think that she deserves credit for opening up the AIDS money," historian Allida Black told PBS in 2011, saying that along with Koop the first lady pressed the president and the secretary of health and human services to allocate research funding to HIV/AIDS issues.
"But," Black continued, "I could never say that without saying they never would have waited this long" if not for the perception that the disease was a problem for gay men.
In the same PBS segment, Nancy's son, Ron Reagan, likewise portrays his mother as an important progressive force on AIDS issues inside the Reagan administration.
Mika
(17,751 posts)Get the lie out there.
Semi-retract later.
revbones
(3,660 posts)and just another day for her supporters.
TM99
(8,352 posts)She did not misspeak. That was a paragraph long statement lying about the 1980's, the Reagans, and AIDS.
TM99
(8,352 posts)One does not answer a question with a paragraph long reply and then claim they misspoke. Well, liars like Clinton do, but not normal folks.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)political points.
ret5hd
(21,320 posts)to score political points, even if she, uhhh....uhhhmmm..."mis-speaks" to do so.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)It's just that you got caught....again....
phantom power
(25,966 posts)Why even go there? There's absolutely no political up side to it.
longship
(40,416 posts)Where's the up side to this?
It just does not make any sense whatsoever. Maybe she did misspeak. But that is one quite egregious misspeaking.
I just don't think this helps her much.
When one is a presidential candidate why say such a controversial thing even at a funeral? Especially at a funeral!!!!
It makes no sense whatsoever any way one looks at it.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)I've seen a couple of explanations, and I guess they might explain her thinking, but I still can't make her thinking make sense to me.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)In the less-than-flattering sense of those politicians who forget that outside the beltway, this isn't just a game to people. Apparently she truly is friends with Kissinger, and the Reagans, and either doesn't realize or doesn't care about how actual voters might remember those people for the things they did.
Loki
(3,826 posts)call my 98 year old mother a silent homophobe for her previous stance on gay rights, which she has changed and for someone who is in her 90's I consider that quite a positive change. I've lost my brother to AIDS, my granddaughter is gay, and I believe that Hillary's explanation is enough for me. If not, I would be the biggest hypocrite in the world by never accepting my own mother's change of heart. This is going to take our party down unless we stop this destructive descent into annihilation by a thousand cuts. The enemy is becoming us.