Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Drug Policy
Related: About this forumLimits on marijuana advertising land Colorado in court
Source: Reuters
Limits on marijuana advertising land Colorado in court
BY KEITH COFFMAN
DENVER Wed Feb 12, 2014 7:15pm EST
(Reuters) - Two publications have sued Colorado in federal court over restrictions that prohibit the state's legalized recreational marijuana industry from advertising on television, radio, online or in most print publications.
High Times magazine, which caters to marijuana enthusiasts, and Westword, a Colorado alternative weekly newspaper, said in a suit filed this week in U.S. District Court in Denver that the rules were "unjustifiably burdensome" and violate free speech rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
"Government restrictions on commercial speech that concerns lawful activity and is not misleading violate the First Amendment," the complaint said.
Under Colorado law, recreational marijuana shops cannot advertise on television and radio, over the Internet, or in print publications unless they can establish that no more than 30 percent of the targeted audience is under the age of 21.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
BY KEITH COFFMAN
DENVER Wed Feb 12, 2014 7:15pm EST
(Reuters) - Two publications have sued Colorado in federal court over restrictions that prohibit the state's legalized recreational marijuana industry from advertising on television, radio, online or in most print publications.
High Times magazine, which caters to marijuana enthusiasts, and Westword, a Colorado alternative weekly newspaper, said in a suit filed this week in U.S. District Court in Denver that the rules were "unjustifiably burdensome" and violate free speech rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.
"Government restrictions on commercial speech that concerns lawful activity and is not misleading violate the First Amendment," the complaint said.
Under Colorado law, recreational marijuana shops cannot advertise on television and radio, over the Internet, or in print publications unless they can establish that no more than 30 percent of the targeted audience is under the age of 21.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/13/us-usa-colorado-marijuana-idUSBREA1C01E20140213
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1574 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Limits on marijuana advertising land Colorado in court (Original Post)
Eugene
Feb 2014
OP
Cigerette companies have not been allowed certain types of advertising for a while
Travis_0004
Feb 2014
#4
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)1. A few years ago
When I lived in Bakersfield Ca there were some pot commercials on TV. And we only have for medical reasons, not all the way legal yet.
Bennyboy
(10,440 posts)2. Lawsuits will be common place...
even though the CO law is well defined, there will be many many many lawsuits filed over all kinds of things such as this.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)3. those two would seem to fit the over 21 demographic
I wonder if they're just testing the law - I can't imagine anyone thinking an alt newspaper and High Times are geared toward teenagers.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)4. Cigerette companies have not been allowed certain types of advertising for a while
I assume they would have sued at one point (and can afford better lawyers), so I would find it tough to believe there is not at least some case law already on this subject.