Is not very strong, it's in the garage, and on camera. All no no's. Otherwise good vid.

... for an AWB and mag capacity limits.

AWB & mag limit laws not needed with universal background checks and record keeping.

banning the use of such registry for use to confiscate firearms from lawful owners.
I do fully support the UCB, enhanced penalties for straw purchase's and I wouldn't really have a problem with a mag limit much like CO, although I really don't see how that would decrease crime.

and 1 I thought of too, but then any clause could be overturned by the next bill, and then it is too late.

Who could the information be given to to keep it safe, but still usable, or how could it be secured so IF confiscation was to ever occur it would be useless?

Some new techonology out there somewhere... Maybe a data base delete button that kicks in the moment someone in legislation says "we need to ban..."

Hmmm...

to prevent a registry from being used as a confiscation tool.
Certainly not me, as my youngest daughter used to tell me, "Dad, you really are computer stupid!"

My son takes all the fun out of Halo...almost.

I can still do OK with my daughter though!

What's that?
I'm still playing the old Sega Gensis, that tells you how old I am.

Each drivers license should have an entry on it that shows if a person is qualified to buy a gun.

ID requirement for one Constitutional Right, ID requirement for all of them.

Come on, man! That's rightie conspiracy theory talk.

Those with assault weapons were required to register them and then the state decided to ban certain ones, guess what they used to determine who had what?
They were all sent letters by Bill Lockyear demanding that they either be turned in, rendered inoperable, or taken out of state.
So, no, it's not a rightie conspiracy, it's a real concern for gun owners.

I can't find the letter that was sent out to the owners of those rifles, it's been posted here before.
But the CA AG used the registry to find out who had those particular rifles and then sent those letters out.
So, yes, that's why there's deep mistrust of a national registry.

The SKS sporter rifle.

Who makes that?

I think you aren't sure of your "facts", eh?

But not confiscated?

When did this happen?

How about the Yugos with the grenade launchers? (Zastava)

All those that were registered in CA.

the ones with the fixed mags were still legal.

Thanks for posting it.

Thought so!

And confiscated?

Pretty obvious at this point.

Nothing but trolling.

I've seen the "scare talk"...... but it never happened!

... saying "Turn in this rifle or face criminal charges," what do you call that?

Thought not!

Are you denying its existence? Or just blowing smoke?

Are you telling me that nobody else did either?

It should be documented.... if it ever happened!

Then again, California walked away from the Second Amendment a long time ago. And they still have nasty problems with homicide and gang violence.

California's a lovely state, but I just want to tell its legislators...

They let NRA mouthpieces spread disinformation in their august pages? Oh no! Shock! Horror! Why -- they're as bad as Fox!

you could have just posted what you meant 15 posts ago. I believe (and it's only a belief) that your purpose here is simply to disrupt. There is something very familiar about your posting style. Do you have a brother or another relative that posts/posted here?

Just curious is all.

The new perpetually-coddled soccer Moms. Walk with pride, lads.

It is a good read. He uses a good bit of wit and humor and meets some interesting people in his travels. One of them is a black gun activist in Detroit who is trying to sell black people on the idea of owning guns and getting carry permits.

Me too! And record requirements........

You knew the answer but just kept asking . What were you trying to accomplish?

A better question would be...... What was the OP trying to accomplish?

Get my point?

I'll drown myself in beer.

Nimbus... what a way to go!

that his sole purpose for being here is to disrupt, nothing more.

I was just trying to see if Mr. Baum was against REASONABLE gun control.

Any harm in that?

at least get the line correct.

What AM I trying to accomplish??