Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumI'm thinking of starting my own petition, RE: Colleges and gun law
Any college faculty that promotes policies that deny students their civil rights should forfeit all public funding.
This includes the right to keep and bear arms provided the student is legally eligible according to the laws of their resident state up to and including the right to carry on campus, concealed or otherwise, in accordance with state law.
The courts have already affirmed the RKBA. The case law is there declaring the RKBA an individual right. This is not only established US constitutional law but also recognized rights within the constitutions of 44 states.
For a faculty member to demand a student forego exercising their legal rights is no different than faculty making disparaging remarks about race, religion, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation. It would create an environment hostile to law-abiding students.
Therefore, faculty who imagine themselves above the law and who would disrupt the learning environment should be put on notice that their departments will forego all public funding and they will denied the use of publically supported facilities and resources. If they feel entitled to thumb their noses at society then they can set aside their reliance on society's money.
I'm willing to bet my petition will gain more popular support than "Cocks before Glocks."
stone space
(6,498 posts)Copied and pasted here to guard against deletion:
I'm thinking of starting my own petition, RE: Colleges and gun law
Any college faculty that promotes policies that deny students their civil rights should forfeit all public funding.
This includes the right to keep and bear arms provided the student is legally eligible according to the laws of their resident state up to and including the right to carry on campus, concealed or otherwise, in accordance with state law.
The courts have already affirmed the RKBA. The case law is there declaring the RKBA an individual right. This is not only established US constitutional law but also recognized rights within the constitutions of 44 states.
For a faculty member to demand a student forego exercising their legal rights is no different than faculty making disparaging remarks about race, religion, ethnicity, gender or sexual orientation. It would create an environment hostile to law-abiding students.
Therefore, faculty who imagine themselves above the law and who would disrupt the learning environment should be put on notice that their departments will forego all public funding and they will denied the use of publically supported facilities and resources. If they feel entitled to thumb their noses at society then they can set aside their reliance on society's money.
I'm willing to bet my petition will gain more popular support than "Cocks before Glocks."
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Fine by me.
stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I agree with the OP.
stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)You said NRA groupies
stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)then they will face sanctions, and rightly so.
And just how would it destroy education?
The other college's that allow CC are doing just fine with their education programs, what makes this college different?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)They can quit on principle. Bet they will not. They just want the paycheck more.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)who were destroying marriage and violating "God's word".
Oh, there is a difference between education and indoctrination.
Hangingon
(3,075 posts)This is preaching to the choir. If they are serious let them go about 5 blocks Southand protest the legislature.p
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)who fired back from his office with (presumabl) a deer rifle. Students retrieved their rifles from residences. In 1970, UT police told me to keep my shotgun in my dorm room until I had reason to use it. He seemed amused that I would inquire about gun policy. I ended up in off-campus housing.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Legal carry for students over 21 that are licensed and trained. Last the firearms are concealed and the calculus teacher or other professor would never know the weapon is present.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)discipline their faculty. I feel the same way if they were complicit in allowing an Islamophobic professor disparage Muslim students in class.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)No defunding then.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)Now I've heard everything.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)he suspected one of his students was concealed carrying. He would refuse to enter class and demand the student be evicted from class by the police.
That strikes me as fairly disruptive of the learning environment.
stone space
(6,498 posts)That strikes me as fairly disruptive of the learning environment.
And you think that the entire Department of Mathematics here should be totally defunded simply because of that?
Seriously?
Guns are disruptive of the learning environment.
Response to stone space (Reply #16)
Post removed
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)alert on it.
stone space
(6,498 posts)alert on it.
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your alert
Mail Message
On Mon Oct 12, 2015, 09:51 AM you sent an alert on the following post:
So you admit you would call for guns to be used against law-abiding students.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=177790
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS
"So you admit you would call for guns to be used against law-abiding students."
Poster said nothing even remotely resembling that.
This vile accusation should be hidden.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Mon Oct 12, 2015, 10:27 AM, and voted 4-3 to HIDE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree with alerter.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: As much as laws should be changed regarding weapons, on this post I do not find hide worthy.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Will people on this site ever develop thicker skin? My goodness people are soft.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Gun love is a sickness.
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)could not even bother to make a comment, lol. That is except the one that said "gun love is a sickness", funny that is not even what was at issue with the alerted post. Typical that the controller side does not even have the basic civil attitude to actually rule on the content of the post. That however does not surprise me and juror #6 really should be alerted on for abusing the jury system
ileus
(15,396 posts)So anyone who approves of the RKBA needs a hide.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)That is why my jury blacklist is full, wish it could be just a bit bigger, you can generally tell who will not truthfully perform jury duty and use it as a weapon.
ileus
(15,396 posts)I had a hide last week making fun of a post above mine, by wording it differently and someone whined about it. I got dinged again....LOL people sure are touchy.
My question is if you do one of those silly alerts is that one canned complaint "rude, over the top ect..." the only selection???
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Saw that somewhere but truthfully, I do not think it would help. They still do not believe in alert stalking. I know it is true a had a round a dozen of my posts alerted on over a couple of days. Survived most but I was put on vacation after my apology was hidden, lol
I get a kick out of some of jury comments, I vote to hide because I hate the gunz, lol. What a croc
stone space
(6,498 posts)Why would you expect such a blatant lie not to be hidden?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)The difference is, I confront those lies with the facts and you have to run and alert. I try not to alert myself. It was barely hidden, I love this comment
Explanation: Gun love is a sickness.
What has that got to do with the post in question? Nothing at all and it is just another hateful comment and another abuse of the jury system.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)hidden a few months ago, didn't you?
You really should be careful with your comments about lying.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)A student who lawfully carries is law abiding.
You said you will call the cops -- people with guns -- to deal with law abiding students. If your words embarrass you that is your problem, not mine.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)If the cops with guns show up and decide no laws are broken and the student is allowed to stay.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Are requested to be unarmed by you. Otherwise you are calling on armed individuals to harass a law abiding student. And that sir, is just sickening.
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)I'm not going to allow myself and my students to become targets just so satisfy some gun nuts on the internet.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)you won't have much choice but to allow firearms in the university's classrooms.
One other question, how would you know if a student was armed?
After all, it would be concealed.
stone space
(6,498 posts)...the police will be notified.
I live in the real world, not in one of your fantasy worlds.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)how would you know if a student is concealed carrying?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)And he knows it. He has been asked several times and he is afraid to actually answer that simple question. Actually quite telling.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)Just doubling down on a disgusting lie.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)the student you would have arrested is targeting you and your students, i.e. a mass-murderer, and then having them arrested as such.
stone space
(6,498 posts)...dismiss class immediately, and call the police.
It really is that simple.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)the question you have been asked many times and seem to be scared to actually answer?
If the 21 or older student has been trained and licensed and is legally carrying CONCEALED, how do you know?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)You "think" might be carrying be guilty of to call for armed police?
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)Would you make sure the police you call are unarmed when they show up to your classroom? Guns being disruptive and all that.
Of course, from seeing your (non)answers to others questions leads me to believe you'll not answer.
That tells me you WOULD allow armed police in your classroom which means you aren't anti-gun at all. You simply want them consolidated in the hands of the "authorities", i.e. LEO and military and not in the hands of citizens.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Police do with weapons, much worse than CCW carriers
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)are carried out CCW holders?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)He knows the truth and will be showing how ignorant and stupid his argument is.
Jurors, since I expect to be alerted on, note I did not call the person ignorant or stupid.
Straw Man
(6,771 posts)I'm not going to allow myself and my students to become targets just so satisfy some gun nuts on the internet.
Do you think that a school shooter will be deterred from coming on campus because of a law banning weapons? That someone bent on a murder/suicide will turn around and go home when confronted with a "Gun Free Zone" sign?
That's a joke.
ileus
(15,396 posts)be visible.
Firearms should always be in a holster in public except to save lives.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Concealed firearm? Are you a mind reader?
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)ileus
(15,396 posts)Problem is the "guns kill people" and "gunshow loophole" true believers would drown out your message.
The first step in higher education is being...
stone space
(6,498 posts)The GOP and the NRA would no doubt both love your proposal.
It is anti-intellectual knownothingism at its finest.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Seems like you are just not telling the truth. Words do matter and you really should apologize for not telling the truth.
stone space
(6,498 posts)He wants to defund the entire Department of Mathematics here just because of me, for example.
That single action would destroy my university.
The RKBA Agenda for Higher Education in this country is becoming quite clear.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)law abiding students who would be following state law. You would not be following state law and should accept sanctions for breaking state law.
Therefore, faculty who imagine themselves above the law and who would disrupt the learning environment should be put on notice that their departments will forego all public funding and they will denied the use of publically supported facilities and resources. If they feel entitled to thumb their noses at society then they can set aside their reliance on society's money.
go find other funding if you want to limit students rights and not follow state law.
So in other words, you are not telling the truth and should apologize.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Do you understand what a State University is?
We're totally funded with public money. Taxpayers pay my salary. Taxpayers pay for the entire operation of the Department of Mathematics.
We can't afford to have the Department of Mathematics shut down here.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I am sure there are other calculus teachers out there that would like that public money. Sounds like you REALLY like that public money. Just follow the law and you and your department would be funded with OUR money.
stone space
(6,498 posts)I am sure there are other calculus teachers out there that would like that public money. Sounds like you REALLY like that public money. Just follow the law and you and your department would be funded with OUR money.
This reads like some libertarian screed against taxes for education.
Are you sure you are posting at the right website?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)You should just be fired when you refuse to follow the law and call the armed police on a student that is following the law. Of course that is fine in your world. Nothing like calling armed officials on a student that was doing nothing illegal. And since the law says all firearms will be concealed, I am curious on who you would call the police on, would you profile? would it be by race or ethnicity? Style of dress? Of course if they do not fire you and you do not take the road of resignation for failing to follow state law and infringing on the the students legal rights, sanctions against the department should be called for. Just not this first step.
stone space
(6,498 posts)You are just making up lies in order to justify having me fired over nothing.
All I said was that if I believe that there is a gun in my classroom, I will cancel class immediately and call the police.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)If the firearm is concealed and nothing is going on would you call the armed police on students peacefully trying to get an education.
I am not lying, you really should stop digging.
And if you refuse to do the job you are being paid via public funding and calling the armed police on students that are doing nothing illegal, yes you should be fired! You sure like that public money, do your job or lose it.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Why do you want to see me fired from my job?
Sometimes RKBAers can be so mean to those of us in the 99% who work for a living.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)So if you refuse to obey the law, you should most certainly be fired.
It is a very, very simple concept, no matter your personal feelings you ARE NOT above the law.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Made up shit doesn't count.
It seems like a simple case of blind hatred on your part.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)since the topic is legalizing concealed carry under state law
...dismiss class immediately, and call the police.
It really is that simple.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=177831
Calling for armed police on your students doing nothing illegal and you refusing to do your job that the public pays for, yes you should be fired.
So how do you know if a student is carrying a legally concealed firearm? Profile?
stone space
(6,498 posts)You must live in a fantasy world if you think it is.
50. If I believe there to be a gun in my classroom, I will...
...dismiss class immediately, and call the police.
It really is that simple.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)like you did with some of my posts a few months ago.
Please, just stop.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)My post was very, very clear: "If you refuse to obey the law, then you should most certainly be fired. It is a very, very simple concept, no matter what your personal feelings, you ARE NOT above the law"
That means that if you were a professor at University of Texas-Austin or any other state funded university or college in Texas and you refused to teach because there was a gun in the classroom, then you are in violation of state law and can be fired accordingly. Additionally, as a professor at a Texas state university, if you repeatedly called the police every time a student with a legal CCW was present in your classroom (not that you would know), then the police could charge YOU with a crime.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)and we are mean for wanting him fired for calling armed police on his students for doing nothing illegal. Talk about a police state.
Best part is if the police showed up and allowed the students to stay as they are doing nothing wrong under state law.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)35+ years and probably in a lot less cushy places as you. No, I do not want to see you fired, so please do not post outright lies like that.
The context is If you called the armed police on a student that is fully law abiding for doing nothing wrong, you should be fired. I see you still ill not answer how you "think" there might be a firearm in your classroom if was legal withing the state. Since it must be concealed I assume you would have to do some kind of profiling, do you use race or ethnicity, style of dress for that?
Bottom line again do you job and there would be no cause for you to be terminated, fail to follow the law and call for armed police on law abiding students, YES you deserve to be FIRED!
stone space
(6,498 posts)In the REAL world, if I believe there is a gun in my classroom, I will cancel class immediately and call the police.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)within your state for that student to carry concealed, you should be fired. Not nice to call armed law enforcement for a student doing a legal activity.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)"Offending stone space's sensibilities" is not a crime.
stone space
(6,498 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)GGJohn
(9,951 posts)filing a false police report, etc.
stone space
(6,498 posts)You are just trying to bully faculty members into endangering the lives of their students and themselves when you make such threats.
Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)If your state changes it's laws to allow CCW on university campuses, you have NO legal authority to prevent a student, who has a CCW, from carrying a gun in your classroom.
Any attempt to use the police to prevent that can open you up to both criminal and civil penalties. If you don;t believe us, you should go ask one of the professors that teach law at your university.
Your chronic and gross misunderstanding of the law being discussed is why no one takes your answers seriously.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I'm stating a fact.
You really are that dense aren't you.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)And that student is following the law and is licensed and carrying concealed. I hope you are penalized if not fired for violating that students rights by calling armed police on them in the real world.
Unfortunately in the real world, you are not above the law!
stone space
(6,498 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)What you stated you would do. I hope it would not be in my dreams as in the real world even calculus teachers are not above the law.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Calculus
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)...however much it offends you.
If a student actually brandishes a firearm, or threatens someone with it, you would
be justified in doing so. I'd even encourage you to do so in such a case
Unless and until these things happen, you do *not* have the right to harass
those you belive are armed, however strongly you feel about the issue
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)That think the same
stone space
(6,498 posts)...I will cancel class immediately and call the police.
That's not making a false report.
That is the instructor of a class acting responsibly for the safety of my students and myself.
All of these threats flying around about having me fired are misplaced, and really quite mean.
It's just a form of bullying.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)If the student is following the law and you refuse to and violate their rights by calling armed law enforcement on them. To bad you are not above the law and if you violate the law and fail to do your job we pay you to do, you are not the victim and suffer the consequences of your actions.
stone space
(6,498 posts)You must live in a FANTASY world.
I live in the REAL world.
If I believe that there is a gun in my classroom, then I will cancel class immediately and call the police.
It really is as simple as that.
What part of "NO" don't you understand?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Is if you are in a state that it is legal. Read the OP. And read my posts.
This includes the right to keep and bear arms provided the student is legally eligible according to the laws of their resident state up to and including the right to carry on campus, concealed or otherwise, in accordance with state law.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)but in the future, if your state legislatures did make it legal, then you would be violating the law if you cancelled class and called the police on a student legally CC'ing and you could be charged.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Doing a lawful activity at the least wasted the law enforcement officers time and could be seen as a false report of a crime.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Doing a lawful activity at the least wasted the law enforcement officers time and could be seen as a false report of a crime.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I just do not know how you can keep saying you would call armed police on your students doing a lawful activity with a straight face.
stone space
(6,498 posts)This is ignorance of the highest order.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)If it is legal in your state.
stone space
(6,498 posts)...I live in the real world, not some NRA fantasy world.
If I believe there is a gun in my classroom, I will immediately cancel class, and call the police.
No amount of RKBA bullying is going to change that.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)on this thread which is about state laws and lawful carry on campus?
This includes the right to keep and bear arms provided the student is legally eligible according to the laws of their resident state up to and including the right to carry on campus, concealed or otherwise, in accordance with state law.
Therefore, faculty who imagine themselves above the law and who would disrupt the learning environment should be put on notice that their departments will forego all public funding and they will denied the use of publically supported facilities and resources. If they feel entitled to thumb their noses at society then they can set aside their reliance on society's money.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172177759
Nobody is bullying you, please quit trying to be the victim. The victim is the student doing a lawful activity that you call the armed police on, not to mention all of the other students that you screwed as you failed to do the job you are being paid to perform. If you decide to break the law, you will have to face the consequences, I hope being terminated for calling the armed police on a student doing a legal thing as long as state law allows it.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)then that would be filing a false police report and abuse of the 911 system.
Are you really that dense?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)...Mr Space has such control and is all-being master of time, space and dimension of his college.
Ya' think?
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)He thinks the University revolves around him and that the institution would collapse without him around.
Talk about an ego.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)...I consider Mr Space the epitome of couth and modesty.
beevul
(12,194 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Geez, get over yourself...
stone space
(6,498 posts)We're a State University.
ALL of our funding us public.
I really get the feeling that some of the gunners in this forum just don't understand how Higher Education works.
I can't imagine how else they could come up with such stupid ideas when it comes to education.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)How do you differ from Kim Davis, aside from the subject of your special pleading?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)And don't call armed police on a student doing a lawful act. Nothing would be refunded. Don't follow the law and you need to be fired
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Big_Mike
(509 posts)Frankly, you should get one free pass for being wrong regarding public law. Polite ridicule would be warranted.
After a second offense, I would expect you to be counseled in writing regarding unwarranted cancellation of classes, wasting student's time as well as police resources.
Following a third iteration, I would expect you to be suspended without pay for a period of time.
If a forth iteration occurred, I would expect your termination from employment with a negative recommendation posted publicly stating your inability to perform your duties in accordance with school policies and procedures.
As an example, say that you stood up in class and demanded that Blacks, Latinos and anyone other than whites move to the rear of the class, and if the students failed to do so, you would call the police to eject them from the classroom. Besides the rightful outroar of the students, I do not imagine the college would be near as tolerant as what I proposed above.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)He will call you a bully and may even alert.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Frankly, you should get one free pass for being wrong regarding public law. Polite ridicule would be warranted.
I'm not wrong about the law.
The cancelation is most certainly warranted if I believe there to be a gun present.
Following a third iteration, I would expect you to be suspended without pay for a period of time.
For what? Doing my job and refusing to expose my students and myself to danger?
Again, for what? Doing my job?
To compare Blacks and Latinos to Deadly Weapons is racism, plain and simple.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)And while you're here, I'll ask (again) another question:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1172177709#post45
Since you're so *very* sure that this practice poses a deadly threat to college instructors,
would you be so kind as to post those instances where a CCW holder shot a teacher
in a college in those states?
You have been given real-world examples of places where students with permits may legally carry firearms in classrooms.
If you can give real-world examples of where this has been problematic, please do so.
Big_Mike
(509 posts)Thank you for your kind responses.
You state that you are not wrong about the law. I would say rather that you disagree strongly with the law, and perhaps see your actions as some type of protest. You do have the right to protest that to which you do not agree, and to do so as often as you see fit. However, I would presume that your act of calling the police would use the 911 system, stating that you see a gun. This type action would be abuse of the 911 system, which is for emergencies.
Have you never had off-duty police personnel in any of your classes? They are trained and licensed in the use of firearms, and many are even required by their local governments to carry off-duty. I would hazard a guess, based upon my exposure to police personnel getting degrees or post-grad degrees trying to improve themselves, that you have had at least a couple over the years. And BTW, CCW holders are also trained and licensed to carry firearms. Also, in general, they are much better trained in firing their weapons, as many fire weekly or monthly to maintain very frangible skills.
As far as exposing yourself and your students to danger, the students are at a minimum 21 years of age or older. As a group they are very law obiding, as they have gone through multiple requirements to be licensed for CCW.
As far as the Black/Latino issue, I was comparing the acts regarding Federal and State Constitutional protections against persecution due to race, religion, sex, etc., many of which have been confirmed by US Supreme Court as well State judicial rulings, to the ability to keep and bear arms in public, also protected by US Supreme Court and State judicial rulings.
Duckhunter, thank you as well for warning. I have been alerted upon before; however, I don't think I have been hidden to date. I could be wrong, as I sometimes am away from the board for a week or so at a time.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)thanks
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)Ummm, no it wouldn't.
LOL, this is pure comedy gold.
mike_c
(36,332 posts)...like court houses, state capitals, state and federal office buildings, airports, etc. How is that different from banning weapons on state university grounds? Would you contend that states (and the feds) are already violating civil rights by disallowing guns in airports, court houses, and so on?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Court houses, most state capitals, most state and federal office buildings and airports all have a hardened outer perimeter with metal detectors and armed personnel to man the metal detectors, prevent people from bypassing the perimeter and ensure the safety of the people inside of the building.
Doing the same for a university campus would at a minimum be prohibitively expensive, if not impossible.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)institutions are covered under that states law, I think it is that 10th amendment thing.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Lurks Often
(5,455 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 13, 2015, 06:52 AM - Edit history (1)
and we take you no more seriously now then we did the first time you said it.
I'm hoping your state changes the laws and allows CCW at state universities. It's probably just a matter of time.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)...nudge the needle on that poor fellow.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Whack!!!!
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)do you do house flies?
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)But those buggers are fast. Calculus teachers are much slower.