Gun Control & RKBA

Eugene

(62,648 posts) Wed Oct 28, 2015, 09:27 AM Oct 2015

San Francisco to vote on requiring CCTV for gun sales

Source: BBC

San Francisco to vote on requiring CCTV for gun sales

27 October 2015 US & Canada

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors is set to vote on an ordinance requiring CCTV recording for all gun and ammunition sales.

City leaders hope the footage would aid criminal investigations.

The city's only gun shop has threatened to close rather than subject their customers to surveillance.

"I won't put my customers through that. It's an invasion of their privacy," Steven Alcairo, manager of the High Bridge Arms store, told The Guardian.

The ordinance would require shops to submit a weekly report to police detailing ammunition sales, type and quantity of ammunition purchased, and identification of the buyer.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

San Francisco to vote on requiring CCTV for gun sales (Original Post) Eugene Oct 2015 OP

Old news, the gun store has already closed it's doors Lurks Often Oct 2015 #1

Customers will now simply buy guns and ammo in next-door San Mateo County,... friendly_iconoclast Oct 2015 #2

Fee-fees trump other considerations. Lizzie Poppet Oct 2015 #3

I don't disagree, but we both know that this security theater will be claimed as a victory... friendly_iconoclast Oct 2015 #4

I don't think it was intended to be security theater. beevul Oct 2015 #5

Whatever the motivation, the results certainly will be friendly_iconoclast Oct 2015 #6

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)

1. Old news, the gun store has already closed it's doors

Reply to Eugene (Original post)

Wed Oct 28, 2015, 09:40 AM

Oct 2015

It happened a week or two ago IIRC. Must be a slow day at the BBC

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)

2. Customers will now simply buy guns and ammo in next-door San Mateo County,...

Reply to Lurks Often (Reply #1)

Wed Oct 28, 2015, 07:12 PM

Oct 2015

...the SFPD will not get any video footage of those transactions, and the city/county
of San Francisco will not derive any sales tax revenue.

On the other hand, the SF Supes 'took a stand', so there's that...

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)

3. Fee-fees trump other considerations.

Reply to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #2)

Wed Oct 28, 2015, 07:26 PM

Oct 2015

And I'm only partly being snarky. Voters' emotional reactions to the issues of the day are critical considerations to any savvy politician.

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)

4. I don't disagree, but we both know that this security theater will be claimed as a victory...

Reply to Lizzie Poppet (Reply #3)

Wed Oct 28, 2015, 07:31 PM

Oct 2015

...even as it does bupkis in the real world

beevul

(12,194 posts)

5. I don't think it was intended to be security theater.

Reply to friendly_iconoclast (Reply #4)

Thu Oct 29, 2015, 01:59 AM

Oct 2015

I think it was only explained as if it were intended to be.

I doubt very much that the people coming up with this shit were unaware of the potential effects that they'd otherwise characterize as 'unintentional'.

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)

6. Whatever the motivation, the results certainly will be

Reply to beevul (Reply #5)

Thu Oct 29, 2015, 03:10 PM

Oct 2015

Reply to this discussion