Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
154 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
$100 gun tax proposed... (Original Post) virginia mountainman Nov 2015 OP
Dumb idea Warpy Nov 2015 #1
And the tax is regressive to boot, natch! nt kelly1mm Nov 2015 #2
excellent idea just like cigarettes and sports people who want them will pay anything for it saturnsring Nov 2015 #3
Smoking sure has decreased since they made the taxes VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #4
well the bullet ought to be out right banned there's nothing protecting them saturnsring Nov 2015 #5
Please do! virginia mountainman Nov 2015 #6
That would become illegal becuse they are bootleg VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #9
"Let me tell the story, let me tell it all. About the mountain boy who ran illegal alcohol..." Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #142
Your beloved cigarette revenuers murdered Eric Garner. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2015 #153
Ummm, GGJohn Nov 2015 #7
Illegal....it bypasses the tqx...bootlegging VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #10
Whaaaaa? GGJohn Nov 2015 #12
It will be when the heavy taxes I want happens VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #15
Sorry, but your fantasy is just that, GGJohn Nov 2015 #18
Its coming snd you all know it.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #20
Uh huh. GGJohn Nov 2015 #23
Uh huh...you know how I know? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #112
Uh huh. GGJohn Nov 2015 #116
Yes...whatever I say... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #118
Uh huh. GGJohn Nov 2015 #121
You damn skippy.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #122
Uh huh. GGJohn Nov 2015 #123
still nothing.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #125
Uh huh. GGJohn Nov 2015 #126
How?? virginia mountainman Nov 2015 #38
Don't bother DonP Nov 2015 #129
How are they going to find me? Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #29
Punitive taxes on bullets for purposes of reducing firearm ownership branford Nov 2015 #75
to that I say... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #141
Read the articles you cite... branford Nov 2015 #152
What you want is irrelevant. Straw Man Nov 2015 #79
I would be for the 100 dollar a drink tax Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #83
Hope that Ammo Tax fantasy keeps you warm and happy this winter DonP Nov 2015 #16
Nothing is illegal about making your own wine or bear. Spirits though are still illegal and there Waldorf Nov 2015 #134
They are very much protected Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #28
It's is protected in the 2nd. It's part of the "Arms". Waldorf Nov 2015 #130
Of course there is. Lizzie Poppet Nov 2015 #154
You may wish to read sarisataka Nov 2015 #8
I don't recall printers ink killing 10's of thousand of VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #11
Bullets and ink sarisataka Nov 2015 #13
One kills 10s of thousands a year.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #17
If you truly believe sarisataka Nov 2015 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #21
I didnt say ban did I? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #22
Which, as you well know and want, would be a defacto ban GGJohn Nov 2015 #24
Aww thats too bad... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #25
The only sad will be yours when your pipe dream fails to materialize. eom. GGJohn Nov 2015 #27
Yeah we are just going to let VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #30
Uh huh. GGJohn Nov 2015 #35
Meanwhile children are dying daily to protect VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #82
The appeal to emotion? GGJohn Nov 2015 #91
are they dying or not? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #92
Not by my firearms. GGJohn Nov 2015 #93
do we control vehicles? YES! VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #94
Do we control firearms? GGJohn Nov 2015 #97
Not nearly enough...tens of thousands die needlessly every year... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #98
Register bullets? GGJohn Nov 2015 #101
why not....I want you to have few of them! VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #102
This is getting funnier and funnier, GGJohn Nov 2015 #105
It beats the shit out of ANY ideas you all have come up with to address the problem which is VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #106
Well, you're right about one thing. GGJohn Nov 2015 #109
I am right about one thing.....YOU got nothing! VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #110
LOL. GGJohn Nov 2015 #115
You don't have time....America always evolves... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #117
they are dying everyday BY GUNS! VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #111
And many more die by other means every day, GGJohn Nov 2015 #119
Yes we should do something about those two VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #120
It's Late Night Comedy in the morning! Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #143
Overheated attempts at moral panic-mongering are always good for lulz friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #150
Exactly as in sarisataka Nov 2015 #26
Its a matter of public safety.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #31
Still pushing that debunked tired old meme? GGJohn Nov 2015 #36
Which as pointed out to you multiple times TeddyR Nov 2015 #87
Well, GWB's ink pen did a pretty good job of killing millions of Iraqi's and thousands GGJohn Nov 2015 #14
Beat me to it beardown Nov 2015 #132
You are deflecting the argument Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #32
And comparing ink to bullets isnt a deflection? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #33
i dont even care any more Travis_0004 Nov 2015 #34
Good give up... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #39
When (not if, *when*) this bill fails to go anywhere in the Republican-held House... friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #45
When indeed VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #47
The use of ink has caused untold millions of deaths, GGJohn Nov 2015 #37
Not without the bullets.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #40
GW's war, including bullets, wouldn't have happened if not for the pen GGJohn Nov 2015 #43
Not without the bullets VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #46
Do you honestly believe that the government will go without bullets? friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #49
Again, without the ink, the bullets wouldn't have been used, GGJohn Nov 2015 #50
Notwithouthebullets VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #54
Lather, Rinse, Repeat. GGJohn Nov 2015 #56
Notwithoutthesoap VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #59
What sort of press do you post with? There was no Internet when the 1st A. was written friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #52
If it gets you away from the fantasy that this has a hope in hell in the GOP-controlled House... friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #42
Old ass GOP are dying off...it will happen VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #44
Not anytime soon, and not with this bill friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #48
Soon enogh... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #53
You mean like vehicles? GGJohn Nov 2015 #58
We do tax cigarettes whiskey...gasoline VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #60
Heroin has been illegal for a century. How hard is it to get where you live? friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #62
Doesnt kill as many as guns... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #65
My god, GGJohn Nov 2015 #66
The 'dream team' of gun control advocates left the building long ago friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #69
actually, it does gejohnston Nov 2015 #68
Who is removing suicide? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #81
Drug overdoses melm00se Nov 2015 #90
But not prohibitively, like you and your ilk want. GGJohn Nov 2015 #63
Yes prohibitively... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #70
Maybe you missed the part where I said those aren't protected rights, GGJohn Nov 2015 #71
Firearms yes...bullets no... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #72
Again, GGJohn Nov 2015 #74
This bill has as little chance of becoming law TeddyR Nov 2015 #88
No...you can hve all the guns you want VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #89
I don't yet have all the firearms I want, but I'm working on it, GGJohn Nov 2015 #95
Yes but I want to prevent you from using them! VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #96
LOL. GGJohn Nov 2015 #99
REGULATE until those needless deaths decrease.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #100
We've suggested many reg. that would help reduce the deaths, GGJohn Nov 2015 #103
fewer bullets would.... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #104
LOL. GGJohn Nov 2015 #107
So what is YOUR solution to those kids dying from their "responsible gun owning" parents guns? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #108
Open carry should be banned except for when hiking in the wildnerness, or hunting. GGJohn Nov 2015 #113
So should they be charged with manslaughter? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #114
If it warrants it, GGJohn Nov 2015 #124
Negligent homicide would be more appropriate. eom. GGJohn Nov 2015 #127
You think the progressive 2Aers have no solutions you should see the banners ideas. ileus Nov 2015 #133
Great new approach. beardown Nov 2015 #135
why stop there....why not a Nuke? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #138
How would you use a nuke to protect your wife coming out of Texas? ileus Nov 2015 #144
By Nuking Oklahoma of course VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #145
We used to only have spoons. ileus Nov 2015 #146
And if spoons were Weapons of Mass Destruction VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #147
and bullets today for that matter Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #84
Doesn't matter sarisataka Nov 2015 #51
Extinct? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #55
Climate change will take a while sarisataka Nov 2015 #57
"Check!"? No, cheap appeal to emotion- your schtick has been seen here many times before friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #61
Yeah nobody cares about children getting gunned down VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #64
Your approach long ago earned a name: Lovejoying friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #67
Doesn't mske me less right... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #73
It doesn't make you right, it makes you a demagogue friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #78
Children are dying.. VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #80
It's not as easy to gin up a moral panic as you seem to believe friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #148
Fewer every year. Face it, your desired moral panic won't happen anytime soon friendly_iconoclast Nov 2015 #149
The problem with that line of reasoning is that support for gun control has been going down kelly1mm Nov 2015 #137
No, it's not. Waldorf Nov 2015 #136
Planted articles and 'writers' led to Iraqmire beardown Nov 2015 #131
If you want to do this, please wait until we make some huge gains in the Democratic Party yeoman6987 Nov 2015 #41
Our loss VanillaRhapsody Nov 2015 #76
re: "...since they made the taxes high..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2015 #128
Kind of like the way that... discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2015 #139
This thread should be pinned. beevul Nov 2015 #77
if you pin all of the threads with as much fail Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #85
Maybe we could nominate a handful and vote to pick a winner once a month. discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2015 #140
How PROGRESSIVE can one get...LOL ileus Nov 2015 #86
It’s a good bill…I support it. Kang Colby Nov 2015 #151

Warpy

(113,130 posts)
1. Dumb idea
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 07:08 PM
Nov 2015

and won't discourage well heeled suburban paranoiacs or people buying hot guns on the black market.

Liability insurance is another matter. Buying a black market gun will get you out of it. Being caught with an uninsured gun will carry penalties.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
4. Smoking sure has decreased since they made the taxes
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 07:13 PM
Nov 2015

high on them.....but I would rather we put a high tax rate on bullets ...no pesky 2nd amendment protecting your rights to bullets to get in the way .

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
6. Please do!
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 07:35 PM
Nov 2015

I can make them by the thousands here at home, and make all kinds of money selling them!! want me to teach you how to so you can profit as well?

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
142. "Let me tell the story, let me tell it all. About the mountain boy who ran illegal alcohol..."
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:04 PM
Nov 2015

-- Robert Mitchum, Thunder Road.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
7. Ummm,
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 08:27 PM
Nov 2015

SCOTUS has already ruled that ammo is part and parcel of the 2A.
Besides, it's pretty easy to reload your own ammo if you have the equipment.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
15. It will be when the heavy taxes I want happens
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 09:49 PM
Nov 2015

It will be how we recover damages for all the death and destruction wrought by a "hobby" .....its for public safety. The cigarette industry had to pony some up.....gungeoneers would just have to suck it up too...pay a penalty in higher taxes on bullets...to the common good...its only fair to the rest of us.

Tens of thousands a year....

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
18. Sorry, but your fantasy is just that,
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 09:51 PM
Nov 2015

a fantasy, meanwhile, I'll continue to reload and shoot my own ammo as I exercise my 2A right.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
112. Uh huh...you know how I know?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:31 AM
Nov 2015

by how hard you defend your precious! You all are scared Shitless over the upcoming new regulations that WILL happen sooner or later. Its just a matter of time.....America always evolves.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
118. Yes...whatever I say...
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:37 AM
Nov 2015

I see you have a GAY rights flag in your sig...

Has America evolved on THAT issue or not? America always evolves....the rest of the world do not have these problems....America always evolves.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
38. How??
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:28 PM
Nov 2015

Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 governors, 69 House seats, 13 Senate seats, in the past 7 years...

Who is going to pass it?

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
129. Don't bother
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 10:16 AM
Nov 2015

When people are caught up in a religious fervor like that they don't listen to reason or logic.

Their only answer will be; "something magically happens" or "just one more SCOTUS judge". They actually still believe that everyone thinks exactly the way they do.

We've been hearing this same old, sad song for decades now and the result is always the same.

The gun control side sits on the couch waiting for someone to do the heavy lifting and pay the bills for them and the only thing that happens is they rush to their keyboard every time some back bencher proposes a new control bill followed by a request for donations, which they ignore.

Then another state loosens its gun laws, violent crime continues to fall, they rush to the keyboards again to bemoan the primitives that allowed this.

That's pretty much the extent of their "activism"

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
29. How are they going to find me?
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:13 PM
Nov 2015

I reload ammo using lead weights from a few car dealerships. Is the IRS going to ask the dealerahip who they give their scrap wheel weights too then track me down?

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
75. Punitive taxes on bullets for purposes of reducing firearm ownership
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:04 AM
Nov 2015

is unconstitutional. You also fail to understand the difference between the enumerated individual right to keep and bear arms and smoking, which has no inherent legal protections.

http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/460/575.html

http://volokh.com/2010/11/04/d-c-s-highest-court-holds-ammunition-ban-violates-second-amendment/

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html

Regardless of the constitutional impediments, such a tax has absolutely no chance of passing either house of Congress. Heck, they cannot even pass a universal background check bill despite purported claims of over 90% support.

Interestingly, it's anticipated that a very small "violence tax" instituted in Seattle, similar in nature but far less onerous than an actual bullet tax, will likely soon fall due to constitutional and state preemption concerns. Prepare for even more pro-gun right legal precedent in the near future.

http://www.examiner.com/article/summary-judgment-hearing-on-seattle-gun-tax-lawsuit-dec-18

 

branford

(4,462 posts)
152. Read the articles you cite...
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:22 PM
Nov 2015

The attempted backdoor ban on the 5.56 "green tip" ammo, just one type of one popular cartridge size, spectacularly failed due to a huge public outcry and legal concerns, and arguably resulted in the resignation of the ATF chief. That's the exact opposite of "it's coming..."

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2015/0321/Gun-control-advocates-lose-another-round-with-departure-of-ATF-chief-video

Similarly, an editorial lamenting the failure of gun control and desiring a greater focus on bullets offers absolutely nothing about the constitutional or electoral problems with such proposals other than insight into the fevered imaginations of firearm prohibitionists.

However, feel free to keep you head in the sand about punitive gun and related tax proposals. Just because you want something or believe it justified, does not make it constitutional or politically palatable to the vast majority of citizens.

While you're anxiously wait for these magic laws and your mythical gun control utopia, the rest of us will continue to watch gun rights expand throughout most of the country both legislatively and through the courts.

Straw Man

(6,760 posts)
79. What you want is irrelevant.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:37 AM
Nov 2015
It will be when the heavy taxes I want happens

It will be how we recover damages for all the death and destruction wrought by a "hobby" .....its for public safety.

The death and destruction is not wrought by the hobbyists, of whom there are millions in this country. It is wrought by criminals. Please explain why the hobbyists should pay for the damage caused by criminals.

How would you feel about slapping a $10 per drink tax on alcohol to pay for the damage that it inflicts on this society daily?
 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
83. I would be for the 100 dollar a drink tax
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 06:37 AM
Nov 2015

I do not drink but the roads are dangerous with those that do and they should pay for the death and damage the alcohol does.

Of course we all know the person that drinks is not responsible for their actions, it is the inanimate object, in this case alcohol.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
16. Hope that Ammo Tax fantasy keeps you warm and happy this winter
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 09:50 PM
Nov 2015

We all noticed you overlooked that part about SCOTUS already determining that ammunition is also covered by the 2nd Amendment.

In fact several appellate courts have also struck down high taxes on guns and ammunition as unconstitutional.

But feel free to get out your checkbook and get a case going with a top rate legal team. Figure about $500 an hour for court time.

Oh, if you lose you will also be contributing in 7 figures to the NRA's legal fees, just like Chicago, San Francisco, DC and a lot of others that thought they were clever too.

Waldorf

(654 posts)
134. Nothing is illegal about making your own wine or bear. Spirits though are still illegal and there
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:06 AM
Nov 2015

is a big push to get that section of the Federal law changed.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
28. They are very much protected
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:11 PM
Nov 2015

If you banned bullets, the courts would throw that out practucally overnight, and some city would be writing another check for the NRAs legal defense.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
154. Of course there is.
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 04:35 PM
Nov 2015

Ammunition is a (consumable) component of a firearm. Already protected under the Second Amendment...

sarisataka

(20,863 posts)
8. You may wish to read
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 09:32 PM
Nov 2015

Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner, 460 U.S. 575 (1983)

To summarize, a tax on printer's ink was an unconstitutional limit on the First Amendment. I believe you can see the parallel with bullets and the Second.

sarisataka

(20,863 posts)
13. Bullets and ink
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 09:44 PM
Nov 2015

Are inert until fired from a gin or used to Write an article persuading the US population that war with Iraq is necessary.

sarisataka

(20,863 posts)
19. If you truly believe
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 09:57 PM
Nov 2015

A bullet ban would be successful, and are not just being obtuse, go right ahead.

I'll stick with practical solutions that won't be overturned in less than a tenth the time it took to pass the law.

Response to sarisataka (Reply #19)

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
24. Which, as you well know and want, would be a defacto ban
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:03 PM
Nov 2015

for those that couldn't afford it, besides, that's already been addressed by the SCOTUS, ammo is part and parcel of the 2A.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
25. Aww thats too bad...
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:06 PM
Nov 2015

How sad.....



Its coming. Or you all better cone up with something....the rest of us thst dont live in fear....dont are tired of watching innocents get gunned down by a "well regulated militia"

Hmmm that regulated worfld....couldn't taxation be a gorm of regulation?

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
30. Yeah we are just going to let
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:13 PM
Nov 2015

Thousands upon thousands be killed often before our very eyes because cameras are everywhere now....and not do anything about it????

Its called evolving

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
35. Uh huh.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:24 PM
Nov 2015


If your pipe dream keeps you warm at night, good for you, meanwhile, I'll continue to exercise my 2A right, comfortable in the absolute knowledge that you and your cohorts don't have a snowball's chance in hell of becoming law.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
93. Not by my firearms.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:06 AM
Nov 2015

Let me ask you this,
Are kids dying by vehicle accidents?
Are kids dying by poisoning?
Are kids dying by drowning?
Are kids dying by abuse?
Are kids dying by disease?

Seems the only kids that are dying that you care about are those the die by firearms.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
94. do we control vehicles? YES!
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:08 AM
Nov 2015

do we control chemicals that cause poisoning YES!
Do we hire Life Guards to prevent drownings YES!
Do we arrest those that commit abuse...YES!
Do we do the best we can to control Disease...YES!

Time to control bullets that are killing children EVERY single day!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
97. Do we control firearms?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:12 AM
Nov 2015

YES!

When was the last time you had to have a background check to buy a vehicle?
When was the last time you had to have a background check to swim in a pool?

We arrest those that use firearms in a criminal manner

That bullet control thing you dream about?
Ain't gonna happen, SCOTUS has already spoken to that.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
98. Not nearly enough...tens of thousands die needlessly every year...
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:13 AM
Nov 2015

time to strengthen those regulations!

Regulate BULLETS!!!

Lets make it so we can use biometrics to fire a weapon...and lets make sure all the bullets are registered!

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
102. why not....I want you to have few of them!
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:20 AM
Nov 2015

Lets register them.....technology is the answer!

If you buy bullets...you buy them with their own serial number. Then whatever happens to those bullets YOU are responsible for. And since that takes time....you will just have to wait...a cooling off period...until your registered bullets arrive.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
105. This is getting funnier and funnier,
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:25 AM
Nov 2015

my wife is literally LHAO at your posts here, hell, even our cows are rolling their eyes at you.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
106. It beats the shit out of ANY ideas you all have come up with to address the problem which is
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:26 AM
Nov 2015

NOTHING! NADA! ZIP! Bupkis!

You are still in denial that there IS a problem. Meanwhile children are dying everyday!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
109. Well, you're right about one thing.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:29 AM
Nov 2015

Children are dying every day, most by something other than firearms, yet you focus on one method and one method only.

Now our chickens and hogs are laughing.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
120. Yes we should do something about those two
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:39 AM
Nov 2015

one doesn't negate the other....we CAN walk and chew gum at the same time!

Yes who IS in denial

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
31. Its a matter of public safety....
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:14 PM
Nov 2015

And it does say..."well regulated militia"....so we regulate the bulletts

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
87. Which as pointed out to you multiple times
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:21 AM
Nov 2015

Would be unconstitutional. And you really ought to read up on the Second Amendment and the meaning of "well regulated." It means in good working condition or well trained as it relates to the "militia," not "subject to extensive regulation" like you think. In fact, your definition doesn't even make sense in the context of the amendment as a whole - "An extensively regulated/controlled militia, being necessary to the security of a free state" is nonsensical, whereas "A well trained and operating militia being necessary to the security of a free state" actually makes sense.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
14. Well, GWB's ink pen did a pretty good job of killing millions of Iraqi's and thousands
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 09:45 PM
Nov 2015

of American military personnel.

beardown

(363 posts)
132. Beat me to it
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:01 AM
Nov 2015

I already did my post before I read yours so I'm keeping mine too.

Glad you noted the Iraqis. I've found with another rabid anti-gunner that he gives Hillery a pass on supporting the Iraq invasion because it had economic benefit. Grossly simplifying the actual thread flow, but that's the gist of it. Very repub view that only America lives matter.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
32. You are deflecting the argument
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:18 PM
Nov 2015

People have a constitutional right to free press, and that means you can not put a special tax on ink to put them out of business.


People have a right to bear arms, and you can not tax bullets out of existence.

if you dislike the second amendment, why dont you work on repealing it?

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
34. i dont even care any more
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:23 PM
Nov 2015

The law wont pass, so Im done with this thread.

Perhaps a 1st year law student can help you understand it.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
39. Good give up...
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:28 PM
Nov 2015

Its about damn time..the rest of us have to live in this world. If moving smokers outdoors because forcing thier smoke into my breathing space is against my rights. AyAt some point the,rights to live of the majority non-gungeoneers trumps your rights to mass bullets

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
45. When (not if, *when*) this bill fails to go anywhere in the Republican-held House...
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:33 PM
Nov 2015

...I suspect you will studiously 'forget' that you ever posted in this thread.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
40. Not without the bullets....
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:29 PM
Nov 2015

We need common sense bullet control

After all when the 2nd A was written....muskets only shot one at a time before reloading....that was bullet control.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
43. GW's war, including bullets, wouldn't have happened if not for the pen
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:32 PM
Nov 2015

that signed the IWR, ergo, the ink is directly responsible for those Iraqi and American deaths.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
50. Again, without the ink, the bullets wouldn't have been used,
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:36 PM
Nov 2015

ergo, ink was the direct result of those Iraqi and American lives.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
52. What sort of press do you post with? There was no Internet when the 1st A. was written
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:39 PM
Nov 2015

Using your logic, the Feds could shut down DU

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
42. If it gets you away from the fantasy that this has a hope in hell in the GOP-controlled House...
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:30 PM
Nov 2015

...it was worth it.

It appears you know little about Constitutional law, and even less about practical politics

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
53. Soon enogh...
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:40 PM
Nov 2015

But not for the tens of thousands including way too many children n your towns and home continue to die needlessly every year intil the vast majority are ginally fed up at babies dying for a minorities "hobby"

If golf caused tens of thousands of deaths your damn skippy we would make golf balls outrageously expensive...

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
65. Doesnt kill as many as guns...
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:50 PM
Nov 2015

And how do heroin addicts benefit your cause.....they have a disease.......are you calling gun ownership a sickness?

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
69. The 'dream team' of gun control advocates left the building long ago
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:56 PM
Nov 2015

As is evinced in this thread, the Washington Generals remain...

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
68. actually, it does
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:55 PM
Nov 2015

after you remove suicides and self defense. Heroin deaths doubled the past couple decades, passing firearms murders.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
81. Who is removing suicide?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 06:04 AM
Nov 2015

And self defense? Hahahaha....there are SOOOOO many of those right? You thiught I would miss that.huh? What a pathetic joke....

Children are dying and you make pathetic jokes...

melm00se

(5,045 posts)
90. Drug overdoses
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:15 AM
Nov 2015

Kill more than all firearms deaths:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/dea-drug-overdoses-kill-more-americans-car-crashes-or-firearms

In 2013, the most recent year for which data is available, 46,471 people in the United States died from drug overdoses, and more than half of those deaths were caused by prescription painkillers and heroin.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
63. But not prohibitively, like you and your ilk want.
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:47 PM
Nov 2015

BTW, those aren't protected rights, like firearm ownership, including ammo, is.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
70. Yes prohibitively...
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:02 PM
Nov 2015

Have you noticed how high the pricecof them have increased in major cities? You think thats not intentional? Not to mention how low teenagw smoking has fallen recently. Dont tell me it wasnt intentionally prohibitive

You know what tells me its a damn good idea? How much of a clamor it caused among you few,guys defending them!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
71. Maybe you missed the part where I said those aren't protected rights,
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:05 PM
Nov 2015

whereas firearm ownership, including ammunition, is.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
72. Firearms yes...bullets no...
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:40 PM
Nov 2015

"A well regulated militia"

You all get to be like Barney Fife with one bullet in your shirt pocket.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
74. Again,
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:03 AM
Nov 2015

maybe you missed the part where I said the SCOTUS has ruled that ammo is part and parcel of the 2A?

"A well regulated militia"


This tired old meme has been thoroughly debunked time and time again, but if it makes you feel better, keep repeating that nonsense.
 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
88. This bill has as little chance of becoming law
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:23 AM
Nov 2015

As a total ban on firearms, which seems to be your ultimate goal. In any event, you may have noticed that firearm laws are becoming LESS restrictive in almost every state in the country, but feel free to keep peddling your losing propositions.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
89. No...you can hve all the guns you want
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:37 AM
Nov 2015

Last edited Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:19 AM - Edit history (1)

Just a limited number of bullets....just like back when your precious 2A was wrtten....keep that musket ball in your pocket Barney Fife!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
95. I don't yet have all the firearms I want, but I'm working on it,
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:09 AM
Nov 2015

as for ammo, I have all I want and need for the moment, and when I run low, I'll either reload my own, or drive into Flagstaff and buy more.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
96. Yes but I want to prevent you from using them!
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:10 AM
Nov 2015

one thing to own them...like having a car in the garage. But as soon as you hit OUR roads.....regulations!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
99. LOL.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:16 AM
Nov 2015

This is pure comedy gold.
OUR roads include me, and I do follow all the regulations of AZ.

Good luck on trying to prevent me from exercising my 2A, or anyone else's 2A right for that matter, I suspect, in the end, you'll be pissed off because the American people aren't on your side.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
100. REGULATE until those needless deaths decrease....
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:17 AM
Nov 2015

Obviously we are not regulating them enough......Left on your own you gungeoneers have not come up with a single solution to reduce these needless deaths...except MORE guns....so looks like the adults are going to have to step in to fix things as usual.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
103. We've suggested many reg. that would help reduce the deaths,
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:23 AM
Nov 2015

only to have them labeled as "NRA talking points".
Adults? That's fucking rich, firearm owners on this board constantly belittled by the "adults".

Nope, you can dream all you want, meanwhile, I live in the real world where I'm free to exercise my 2A right comfortable in the knowledge that my right isn't going away by the likes of you and your ilk.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
104. fewer bullets would....
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:24 AM
Nov 2015

bullets registered to your name....making you responsible for their storage....if something happens to them...its on you. Better lock those precious bullets up.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
108. So what is YOUR solution to those kids dying from their "responsible gun owning" parents guns?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:28 AM
Nov 2015

MORE guns!

Why lets just let all kindergartners Open Carry!

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
113. Open carry should be banned except for when hiking in the wildnerness, or hunting.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 09:34 AM
Nov 2015

Prosecute more vigorously those parents that leave firearms around where children can access them.
Mandatory firearm safety lessons for children, in the form of Eddie Eagle safety course.
Safe storage laws would help reduce negligent firearm deaths and injuries of children.
Mandatory safe storage course for first time firearm owners.

beardown

(363 posts)
135. Great new approach.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:07 AM
Nov 2015

Interesting. Keep them at home okay. Time to order up that 120mm anti-tank gun I've had my eyes on for awhile now. Under the new 'keep them at home okay' rule, I'm good. Too hard to tow the damn thing to the shooting range anyway.

ileus

(15,396 posts)
144. How would you use a nuke to protect your wife coming out of Texas?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:13 PM
Nov 2015

It would be tough, a M&P Shield would fit the bill though. Personal safety devices should never be denied....right to life should always guarantee individual ownership of small arms like pistols and rifles.

sarisataka

(20,863 posts)
51. Doesn't matter
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:39 PM
Nov 2015

until we can get Democrats out and voting. We will all be extinct if we wait for Republicans to die of old age before reversing our losing streak.

sarisataka

(20,863 posts)
57. Climate change will take a while
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:43 PM
Nov 2015

but if we keep on as is, we are on the same path as the dinosaurs. The difference is we could do something about our fate.

*And don't put bullshit words in my mouth*

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
64. Yeah nobody cares about children getting gunned down
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:47 PM
Nov 2015

Last edited Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:52 PM - Edit history (1)

No one will ever finally get tired of that....

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
73. Doesn't mske me less right...
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:54 PM
Nov 2015

Its getting pretty damn old....

If you are not going to be part of he solution....then you must b be part of the problem...

kelly1mm

(5,098 posts)
137. The problem with that line of reasoning is that support for gun control has been going down
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:25 AM
Nov 2015

over the last 25 years and gun laws (especially in regards to concealed carry/open carry) have gotten remarkably more liberal over that same period . If support as concentrated in older voters one would expect to see the opposite.

Waldorf

(654 posts)
136. No, it's not.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:23 AM
Nov 2015

Stopping the ink to the ink presses was stopping people from exercising their 1st Amendment right.

Stopping the sale of bullets will stop people from exercising their 2nd Amendment right.

Your only real option is somehow getting enough voters and politicians to start the process to amend the 2nd Amendment, which in todays age will not happen. Maybe 50 yrs. in the future, maybe 100, maybe never.

beardown

(363 posts)
131. Planted articles and 'writers' led to Iraqmire
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 10:53 AM
Nov 2015

which has led to thousands of US deaths, many occurring years after the fact due to the stress endured by troops there, and tens of thousands of permanent body and mind injuries. It's also led to hundreds of thousands of deaths in the nations we invaded and millions of refugees, but your concern explicitly stated Americans so we won't count those types.

Other articles and media have led to Rush Limburger and a roaring hate festering environment that has led to cutbacks in social and economic support networks which have caused tens of thousands of deaths due to poor medical access and tens of thousands of more deaths in middle class men in their late 40-50's per recent articles stating the US is alone in developed nations where death rates are increasing for that demographic.

Unconstitutional confiscatory tax on bullets. No harm from articles. Arguing from ignorance should be done at republican underground and not here.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
41. If you want to do this, please wait until we make some huge gains in the Democratic Party
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 10:29 PM
Nov 2015

That way when it's brought up our loss' won't be so bad. We have 18 governorships left. I'd like to keep them. We have 12 state houses left. I'd like to keep them. All I ask is you wait until we gain some seats.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,565 posts)
128. re: "...since they made the taxes high..."
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 10:15 AM
Nov 2015

Last edited Fri Nov 6, 2015, 04:31 PM - Edit history (1)

Please check your dictionary/thesaurus.
The terms "since" and "because" are not synonymous.

 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
151. It’s a good bill…I support it.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:15 PM
Nov 2015

I actually have mixed emotions about this proposal. Allow me to explain what I mean.

This is nothing more than a gun control publicity stunt, meant solely to establish gun control bona fides for its sponsor. That’s it. This bill, like all other gun control bills will never see a committee vote. It will never leave committee and will rest peacefully in a desk drawer somewhere on the Hill. No one will formally discuss or debate the merits of this proposal in any congressional committee. That’s the reality of it. I realize this fact; most of you folks understand how this works.

But a lot of folks don’t realize this. The GOA & NRA will trumpet bills like this using social media and direct mailers. State based 2A organizations well talk about the bills during their chapter meetings. Money will flow into the NRA/Pro-2A coffers. When nothing materializes the national 2A orgs will celebrate this as another victory…all thanks to the support of ordinary folks like you. With each of these bills, we are able to bring in more and more money. With more money we can get more done; while making it all the more likely we will be able to defeat any potential legitimate gun control proposal in the future. Today’s “$100 gun tax” bill is funding for tomorrow’s constitutional carry state. It provides resources for more sophisticated marketing efforts that allow us to grow the base. We’ve been able to do a lot over the last few years and have made significant progress in expanding our reach thanks to monetary inflows. Bills like this indirectly provide funding for groups like SAF to file and support lawsuits against gun control. We were able to get suppressors in Minnesota, spent shell casing laws repealed in Maryland, constitutional carry in Maine and Kansas, some campus carry in Texas, simplified permitting in Michigan, reduced permit costs in Mississippi, repeal of the 48 hour waiting period in Wisconsin, and expansion of carry rights in states across the country. For that, I have to thank the gun controllers because without their absolutism, a lot of what we do just would not be possible due to lack of funding.

Any gun control proposal, regardless of its merits is a good thing for national 2A. So, in that regard I love bills like this. They amount to a huge fundraising effort for 2A. What’s not to love? Well, there is a major downside…

The message that many folks around the country hear when bills like this are proposed, is “the only thing standing between you and a $100 firearms tax is the Republican Party.” They remember that and they will be at the polls 100% of the time. As a lifelong Democrat, I think its seriously time we push gun control support as far away from the party as possible.

KC

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»$100 gun tax proposed...