What are you trying to say? CCW is bad or thieves are bad? Or are the police bad?

I can positively state Malls are bad!

On Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:49 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

Yes, and?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=181401

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

MIRT - This new member appears to be a DU member on time-out. This may violate the TOS. Please hide and send to MIRT.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:59 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I see no evidence supporting the alerter's accusation.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: On its face, the post is OTT
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Voting to hide, though seriously, alerter could have had a swifter response from MIRT if he or she contacted MIRT directly.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: i don't think the post itself should be hidden. It's sarcastic, but has a point in that the post to which it is in response is a story posted without comment. Maybe the poster is a DUer on time out, but if that's the reason for the alert, it seems a bit tattle-tale-ish.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: yep yep yep
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Appears to whom, and on what basis?


I think the answers to that question are pretty obvious.

but for some reason, I feel the alerter will never have the guts to answer them. Sad they can get away with baseless accusations then run away and hide.

Well...practice makes perfect...

the gun toters and being sued.