Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumNRA Proposes Exclusive New Gun Control Law
Last edited Mon Nov 23, 2015, 11:42 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.newsyoushouldntbelieve.comNRA Proposed Firearms Law Would Restrict Ownership
by Noe Schuting
In a closed news conference, Wayne LaPierre, of the National Rifle Association, today proposed a radical and exclusive firearms control law. After careful screening and passing through a metal detector and frisking, a select group of media reporters was admitted to the secure briefing room. LaPierre immediately launched into his remarks.
"The American People are shocked and dismayed at the recent violence in Paris and dangerous incidents within the United States. Firearms in the wrong hands are creating a dangerous world, and we are now proposing a federal law that would restrict firearms ownership to only those who deserve to own them. This law would impose strict limitations on who could own firearms by requiring NRA membership before a permit to own a firearm could be issued."
He continued:
"The NRA will conduct thorough screening of all membership applications and will deny membership to the following groups. Without NRA Membership they people not be able to own firearms in any form, and any currently owned will be confiscated by heavily-armed local law enforcement SWAT units:"
Followers of the Islamic Religion - The reasons are quite obvious.
People with Weird or Foreign Sounding Names - Why take chances?
Certain Ethnic Minorities - These will be determined based on arrest statistics.
Card-Carrying Democratic Party Members - Such people are anti-American.
Anyone We Don't Like - Any suspicious characters will be denied a membership.
When asked if these new rules would unfairly restrict people's rights under the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, LaPierre's reply was brief and to the point:
"We will determine what people deserve those rights."
It remains to be seen whether such an exclusive law will be enacted by Congress, of course, but LaPierre indicated that they had enough supporters lined up in the House of Representatives to pass it quickly.
by Noe Schuting
In a closed news conference, Wayne LaPierre, of the National Rifle Association, today proposed a radical and exclusive firearms control law. After careful screening and passing through a metal detector and frisking, a select group of media reporters was admitted to the secure briefing room. LaPierre immediately launched into his remarks.
"The American People are shocked and dismayed at the recent violence in Paris and dangerous incidents within the United States. Firearms in the wrong hands are creating a dangerous world, and we are now proposing a federal law that would restrict firearms ownership to only those who deserve to own them. This law would impose strict limitations on who could own firearms by requiring NRA membership before a permit to own a firearm could be issued."
He continued:
"The NRA will conduct thorough screening of all membership applications and will deny membership to the following groups. Without NRA Membership they people not be able to own firearms in any form, and any currently owned will be confiscated by heavily-armed local law enforcement SWAT units:"
Followers of the Islamic Religion - The reasons are quite obvious.
People with Weird or Foreign Sounding Names - Why take chances?
Certain Ethnic Minorities - These will be determined based on arrest statistics.
Card-Carrying Democratic Party Members - Such people are anti-American.
Anyone We Don't Like - Any suspicious characters will be denied a membership.
When asked if these new rules would unfairly restrict people's rights under the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, LaPierre's reply was brief and to the point:
"We will determine what people deserve those rights."
It remains to be seen whether such an exclusive law will be enacted by Congress, of course, but LaPierre indicated that they had enough supporters lined up in the House of Representatives to pass it quickly.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 2074 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NRA Proposes Exclusive New Gun Control Law (Original Post)
MineralMan
Nov 2015
OP
Unfortunately, selective support for civil rights is not confined to the right wing
friendly_iconoclast
Nov 2015
#8
Jarqui
(10,490 posts)1. From "news you shouldn't believe" site?
ileus
(15,396 posts)2. "We will determine what people deserve those rights."
Who does that sound like...
MineralMan
(147,593 posts)3. Sounds like right-wingers in general to me.
They're for freedoms, but only for themselves and others who think as they do.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)6. Actually, Mineral, sounds like Jim (large raucous black bird) laws...
Those actually existed, and were not part of some Onionesque hat & cane humor.
doc03
(36,711 posts)4. That is what the NRA would like for sure. You have to take
a NRA shooting course to get a CCW now. Then along with that they try to get you signed up for the NRA or force you to join in order to shoot at a NRA range to qualify for a CCW.
MineralMan
(147,593 posts)5. It is, isn't it.
They want guns for them, but not for others. And they decide who the "others" are. Very selective in their support for Constitutional freedoms, they are.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)7. Some controller here are floating a Terrorist Watch List Ban....
Another reality.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)8. Unfortunately, selective support for civil rights is not confined to the right wing
Certain 'progressives' don't mind cafeteria Constitutionalism as long as it impacts
only "those people"...