Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 05:40 AM Nov 2015

Houston Zoo reinstalls signs prohibiting guns

HOUSTON -- The Houston Zoo has reinstalled signs that prohibit carrying firearms into the zoo, three months after they were removed due to threat of legal action.

The Houston Chronicle reports Attorney Edwin Walker with Texas Law Shield sent a demand letter to the Houston Zoo, its corporate entity and the city's parks and recreation department on Sept. 3 asking they take down all guns-prohibited signs at the zoo.

Once the signs were removed, zoo staff said they would consult with lawyers about what their next step should be.

Houston Zoo spokeswoman Jackie Wallace said the signs were put back because the zoo is an educational institution that exempts if from being forced to allow firearms within its gates. Wallace said the zoo has an Education Department that employs 17 professional educators.

http://abc13.com/news/houston-zoo-reinstalls-signs-prohibiting-guns/1100428/
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Houston Zoo reinstalls signs prohibiting guns (Original Post) SecularMotion Nov 2015 OP
Who the FUCK would sue a zoo to... TreasonousBastard Nov 2015 #1
The answer is, "assholes." Hoppy Nov 2015 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author trusty elf Nov 2015 #3
3 months with no signs Duckhunter935 Nov 2015 #4
Do they search a Kangaroo's pouch? Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #5
That's their right. I honor such signs, despite there being no legal obligation to do so. Lizzie Poppet Nov 2015 #6
That certainly works for private property but the zoo is public property. Hangingon Nov 2015 #7

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
1. Who the FUCK would sue a zoo to...
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 06:19 AM
Nov 2015

let them carry their guns in there?

There are times when it's not a gun, but a horsewhip that tempts me...

Response to SecularMotion (Original post)

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
6. That's their right. I honor such signs, despite there being no legal obligation to do so.
Fri Nov 27, 2015, 12:17 PM
Nov 2015

With certain exceptions (usually part of federal law or explicitly stated in Oregon law), "no guns" signs carry no force of law here. All they can do, if the believe you to be armed, is ask you to leave (and that does have force of law behind it: if you refuse, you're guilty of trespass).

But I respect the right of the person in charge of the property to make that request, and I honor it. I (very) rarely make an exception if I happen to be out on a multi-stop errand running trip and unexpectedly encounter such a sign at one of my stops. I won't stash my weapon in the car (even if it's out of sight, that's just not proper weapon security), and if I'm clear across town and the errand at the "no guns" business is urgent, I occasionally just go with "what they don't know won't hurt them."

Not often at all, though. I really do consider this to be the right of the business owner/manager.

Hangingon

(3,075 posts)
7. That certainly works for private property but the zoo is public property.
Sat Nov 28, 2015, 12:34 PM
Nov 2015

I would like to see the suit test this. It might be possible for the educational areas - classrooms and school demo areas - to be gun free while permitting carry in the rest of the zoo.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Houston Zoo reinstalls si...