Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumWhat Will It Take to End the Ban on Gun Violence Research?
Named after former Rep. Jay Dickey, the ban prohibits government spending on gun control advocacy. Though it doesnt explicitly ban research on gun violence, this clause and its attendant risk to funding has caused government researches to avoid the topic for many years.
Even former Rep. Dickey, who wrote the original research-blocking legislation, is no longer happy about it.
Research could have been continued on gun violence without infringing on the rights of gun owners, in the same fashion that the highway industry continued its research without eliminating the automobile it is my position that somehow or someway we should slowly but methodically fund such research until a solution is reached. Doing nothing is no longer an acceptable solution.
https://sojo.net/articles/what-will-it-take-end-ban-gun-violence-research
daleanime
(17,796 posts)because then just a few more of us wouldn't be able to hide from the truth.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)When a "ban prohibits government spending on gun control advocacy" that is NOT a "ban on funding gun research".
Those two issues are NOT the same.
They are DIFFERENT.
For example, advocacy: 'public support for or recommendation of a particular cause or policy';
however, research: 'the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions'; these terms have completely non-similar definitions. They are distinctly unalike, contrastive, divergent and even disparate.
Now about this source to which you've linked, apparently there are some other interesting articles:
> That Time C.S. Lewis Predicted the Future
> How Sci-Fi and Fantasy Help Us Understand the Divine
> Nine Ways Jesus Is Like the Doctor
> Maybe Theres Hope: Looking for God in 'The X-Files' Reboot
Kang Colby
(1,941 posts)not banned. In fact, CDC completed such research in 2013. What is rightfully banned is CDC's ability to advocate for gun control.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)DonP
(6,185 posts)The imaginary ban on research is a big one.
The "Magic Bullet Button" that makes any AR full auto.
With record high background checks month after month, "There are no new gun owners", (Illinois and Mass with millions of new FOID cards are just anomalies).
I bet we could get a seriously long thread going, just based on imaginary things the gun controllers take as an "Act of Faith" that just aren't so.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)DonP
(6,185 posts)Or the generic "The Urban Myths of Gun Control"
Kind of like our Favorite Gun Control phrases thread; e.g. "Awash in Guns", "No gun laws", "Easier to buy a gun than a book" et. al.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)There's no end to the lies, lies by omission, misused terminology, manufactured terms designed to be confusing and misleading statistics. It could reach epic proportions.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)krispos42
(49,445 posts)...could cough of some private funds to do the research, right?
Jeez, from the way you guys freak out about this you'd think there wasn't a single private non-profit group able to research this stuff.
friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)Of course, only a churl would even suggest that he's just playing at being a gun control
advocate in order to stick a spoke in the wheels of the Democratic Party...
Oneka
(653 posts)Nuff said!
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)despite being corrected several times?