Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 07:41 AM Dec 2015

What Will It Take to End the Ban on Gun Violence Research?

On Dec. 18, the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives passed the $1.1 trillion omnibus spending bill to fund the government through next year. The bill included a Republican rider to continue a 17-year-old ban on funding gun research — the Dickey amendment.

Named after former Rep. Jay Dickey, the ban prohibits government spending on gun control advocacy. Though it doesn’t explicitly ban research on gun violence, this clause and its attendant risk to funding has caused government researches to avoid the topic for many years.

Even former Rep. Dickey, who wrote the original research-blocking legislation, is no longer happy about it.

“Research could have been continued on gun violence without infringing on the rights of gun owners, in the same fashion that the highway industry continued its research without eliminating the automobile… it is my position that somehow or someway we should slowly but methodically fund such research until a solution is reached. Doing nothing is no longer an acceptable solution.”


https://sojo.net/articles/what-will-it-take-end-ban-gun-violence-research
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Will It Take to End the Ban on Gun Violence Research? (Original Post) SecularMotion Dec 2015 OP
Won't happen.... daleanime Dec 2015 #1
English buddy, read the English discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 #2
This is an outright lie. Gun related research is Kang Colby Dec 2015 #3
say the outright lie enough times Duckhunter935 Dec 2015 #4
We need to compile a list of "Gun Control Urban Legends" DonP Dec 2015 #5
Any ideas for title? discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 #6
"Stuff they just make up"? DonP Dec 2015 #7
I say go for it discntnt_irny_srcsm Dec 2015 #8
Uh, stop the "advocacy" for gun control? Seems reasonable, how 'bout you? Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #9
Surely all the millions of people that are on your side... krispos42 Dec 2015 #10
Maybe the well-known gun control advocate that's worth several billion dollars could pitch in? friendly_iconoclast Dec 2015 #12
"Though it doesn’t explicitly ban research on gun violence" Oneka Dec 2015 #11
Still posting this lie GGJohn Dec 2015 #13

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,577 posts)
2. English buddy, read the English
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 08:25 AM
Dec 2015

When a "ban prohibits government spending on gun control advocacy" that is NOT a "ban on funding gun research".
Those two issues are NOT the same.
They are DIFFERENT.

For example, advocacy: 'public support for or recommendation of a particular cause or policy';
however, research: 'the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions'; these terms have completely non-similar definitions. They are distinctly unalike, contrastive, divergent and even disparate.



Now about this source to which you've linked, apparently there are some other interesting articles:

> That Time C.S. Lewis Predicted the Future

> How Sci-Fi and Fantasy Help Us Understand the Divine

> Nine Ways Jesus Is Like the Doctor

> ‘Maybe There’s Hope:’ Looking for God in 'The X-Files' Reboot

 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
3. This is an outright lie. Gun related research is
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 08:33 AM
Dec 2015

not banned. In fact, CDC completed such research in 2013. What is rightfully banned is CDC's ability to advocate for gun control.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
5. We need to compile a list of "Gun Control Urban Legends"
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 10:06 AM
Dec 2015

The imaginary ban on research is a big one.

The "Magic Bullet Button" that makes any AR full auto.

With record high background checks month after month, "There are no new gun owners", (Illinois and Mass with millions of new FOID cards are just anomalies).

I bet we could get a seriously long thread going, just based on imaginary things the gun controllers take as an "Act of Faith" that just aren't so.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
7. "Stuff they just make up"?
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 01:26 PM
Dec 2015

Or the generic "The Urban Myths of Gun Control"

Kind of like our Favorite Gun Control phrases thread; e.g. "Awash in Guns", "No gun laws", "Easier to buy a gun than a book" et. al.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,577 posts)
8. I say go for it
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 01:50 PM
Dec 2015

There's no end to the lies, lies by omission, misused terminology, manufactured terms designed to be confusing and misleading statistics. It could reach epic proportions.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
10. Surely all the millions of people that are on your side...
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 02:54 PM
Dec 2015

...could cough of some private funds to do the research, right?

Jeez, from the way you guys freak out about this you'd think there wasn't a single private non-profit group able to research this stuff.

 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
12. Maybe the well-known gun control advocate that's worth several billion dollars could pitch in?
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 08:36 PM
Dec 2015

Of course, only a churl would even suggest that he's just playing at being a gun control
advocate in order to stick a spoke in the wheels of the Democratic Party...

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»What Will It Take to End ...