Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumGun Control and White Terror
On Tuesday, in an emotionally charged speech, President Obama announced a series of relatively modest executive orders to aid in preventing guns from getting into the wrong hands.
The proposal would expand background checks through a clarification of existing regulations, increase funding for mental health care, and promote the development of smart guns.
The speech itself accomplished more than the executive actions are likely to accomplish. Viewed in political terms, the president injected this issue more firmly into the national debate as only a president can. Because a sitting president, even an exiting one, is always in the next presidential race: Other candidates are either running, at least in part, against his legacy or to extend it.
But there is one point that I was aching to hear articulated that wasnt covered in the presidents speech, and is rarely mentioned in discussions about gun regulations: How our response to gun regulations is not now, nor has ever been, wholly ideological but is also ethnocentric and class-based.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/07/opinion/gun-control-and-white-terror.html
The proposal would expand background checks through a clarification of existing regulations, increase funding for mental health care, and promote the development of smart guns.
The speech itself accomplished more than the executive actions are likely to accomplish. Viewed in political terms, the president injected this issue more firmly into the national debate as only a president can. Because a sitting president, even an exiting one, is always in the next presidential race: Other candidates are either running, at least in part, against his legacy or to extend it.
But there is one point that I was aching to hear articulated that wasnt covered in the presidents speech, and is rarely mentioned in discussions about gun regulations: How our response to gun regulations is not now, nor has ever been, wholly ideological but is also ethnocentric and class-based.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/07/opinion/gun-control-and-white-terror.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1965 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun Control and White Terror (Original Post)
SecularMotion
Jan 2016
OP
ileus
(15,396 posts)1. The 2A is for all races....all of us should be progressive 2A supporters.
hack89
(39,179 posts)2. Protecting POC's 2A rights should be a Democratic Party issue. The RW certainly won't do it. Nt
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)3. Where do you think US gun control originated?
Clue: it's last name is "Crow." Couldn't have "uppity negroes" arming themselves...
sarisataka
(20,877 posts)4. So to sum up the article:
Historically gun control has been used by racists to keep guns out of the hands of black people. But it is racist if we do not enact gun control now to get guns out of the hands of black people.