Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumIngenious New Non-Lethal Bullet Burns Propellant Inside the Round
The Pogojet whose official name is the Caseless Telescoping Less-lethal Systemis unique in that the propellant burns inside the round, pushing on a piston that propels it forward. The action resembles a pogo stick, hence the name. Once the piston reaches its full extent, the exhaust gases can be vented sideways, so the round continues forward at the same speed, or directed through holes in the base of the round like rocket exhaust to give as much extra kick as required. This is the 'jet' aspect of the Pogojet, which Widder compares to the old 1960s Gyrojet rocket pistol.
It's a clever design meant to get around a pesky problem. Conventional wisdom says that the non-lethal rounds used to stun suspects need to be big, soft, and slow. Think of the bean bag rounds fired from police shotguns, the 40mm sponge grenades used by the military, and traditional "rubber bullets." Their low velocity gives them a shorter range than a thrown rocka serious disadvantage when facing rioters.
The other challenge with less-lethal impact weapons is balancing effectiveness with safety. A round that travels slowly enough to be safe at point-blank range is ineffective at long range. Increase the muzzle velocity to knock down a target further away and the weapon becomes potentially deadly when used up close.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a18812/pogojet-non-lethal-gun/
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)nt
jonno99
(2,620 posts)branford
(4,462 posts)requiring less-than-lethal options such as crowd control. The article states being hit be the round is similar to a bee sting. It's designed to dissuade, not stop an individual, similar to bean bag rounds. Lastly, the gun has not yet even entered serious testing, and might ultimately prove to far more dangerous or ineffective than anticipated..
In light of the above, the Pogojet appears to offer very little in the current individual gun rights / self-defense / Second Amendment political debate.
DonP
(6,185 posts)Great idea in theory and IIRC it made its way into one James Bond movie as a prop, but the only problem was they couldn't hit anything with it.
benEzra
(12,148 posts)that can still kill if fired at the head instead of the torso (did you read the article?)
It's a longer-range alternative to beanbag rounds, which are also lethal if misused. Used very carefully, they can distract someone and cause a lot of pain without causing lethal injury, but it's not something that would be used in lieu of a firearm, or a taser for that matter.