Can his position on the issues be molded like soft clay to get the votes of the audience he is currently addressing?

It also means that now ALL Democrats are united against the PCLAA and that the only ones arguing for special corporate legal giveaways to the gun industry are those in the Clown Car.

DEMOCRATS UNITED!

FINALLY!

Doubtful. And zero chance a repeal happens in any event.

It's the folks in the Clown Car who support special corporate legal giveaways for the gun industry.

All Democrats? No, not all. And as I mentioned, zero chance this bills is repealed. What "Clown Car" would that be? That almost sounds offensive. Are you a driver of the Clown Car? If not, who drives the Clown Car? Who is a passenger?

Who you are talking about and trying not to get your 5th hide for insults.

Kind of like the insinuation I am a racist in this thread.

Questions are hard, especially when they require you to support your position. So, any interest in answering the question, or do you just want to make vague references to "clown cars"?

Given time he will run away or beg to be left alone, but he will not answer a direct question.

Could at least support their position with some thought. Might be too much to ask in certain instances though.

"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

Repeal will change nothing except plug the federal court system with elite idealists frivolous law suits...congrats for support of 1%ers using our system as their personal whipping post...

it is because he has heard the prayers of his people like a good deity.

...you might not be in this situation if would better convey what you really intend.

I never ever miss a chance to add the thingie since so many folks have either lost the manuals for their sarcasm meters or might have allowed the batteries to run low.

So did you mean to say "under the bus with Bernie" or was that sarcasm?

...a corporate legal giveaway to the gun industry and the rest of his message that he's been pushing out here no longer exists.

The conflict between...

...a corporate legal giveaway to the gun industry and the rest of his message that he's been pushing out here never existed.

...for evidence of the firearms industry claiming "Guns don't kill people."

Please note the absence of a sarcasm tag, winking smilie or other indication that my exact words should be taken as implying anything other than their exact denotative meaning.

With a link

...I'm Zimmerman.

The rest of us understand the utility and logic of the bill...

Oh, and just because he has succumbed to the cries of the incredibly stupid with his reluctant "support" for repeal doesn't mean it will ever.. in any of our lifetimes....be repealed....it won't because it was the right thing to do for both our court system and for justice...

Of course he did get a couple of hides for them being insulting and over the top. Maybe he does not want number five and another vacation. Has not stopped him several times before, though.

we all realize "simplicity" for some is rocket science for some less intellectually fortunate. ...

It does have six exceptions so a person would need two hands to count that high.

...from time to time. But for the life of me I cannot recall you ever posting anything other than "gun humpers are ammosexual Zimmerite poopy heads" posts. No content whatsoever...

Happen, I have also read he has amendments to the proposed bill

eom

Permitting nuisance lawsuits against any legal manufacturer is egregious, anti-democratic bullshit.

I am glad it will not be changed

You'll get your chance to make your arguments to him when he comes to your state.

We've made ours.

And it's having an impact.

We have politicians actually listening to us.

...by supporting a (stupid) piece of legislation that is doomed to fail. I dislike that kind of cynical "pro politician" stuff from a candidate I actually respect...but I suppose it's necessary.

But don't be fooled: this issue is going away after the primaries, regardless of which candidate wins.

Hell, we don't want our loved ones shot at all.

But being sued into bankruptcy as punishment for having a loved one murdered strikes most rational voters as unnecessarily cruel and sadistic.

Iowa voters know about it.

If you don't, try google.

Or remain in the dark about what Iowa voters know but you don't.

Our caucus is but days away...would you pass the popcorn, please?

I know this is not about the Colorado couple that the Brady bunch filed suit for them. Not to mention they were employed at one time by them. They continued the lawsuit even when advised they would lose due to Colorado state law.

Once again you make a baseless accusation and when called on it just runs away and insults. How nice you are. Glad I am not a student of yours.

...in having a degree in calcululz

...my shop has me up for a spot working in Ceder Rapids.

I'm hoping the opening in Maryland comes through first but who knows, soon I might be closer to you.

They sued the online store that (in full accordance with all applicable federal and state statutes in Tennessee and Colorado) sold ammunition to James Holmes.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lonnie-and-sandy-phillips/lucky-gunner-lawsuit_b_8197804.html

The parents, both associated with the Brady Campaign, sued and after the case was dismissed under Colorado HB 000-208 to pay the legal costs for the dealer, Lucky Gunner for over $200,000 and the parents are now claiming they are bankrupt.

I had no interest in doing research for him so I asked him to do it. He didn't feel like it and was evidently more interested in finding new ways to insult people.

As far as the details of the Phillips' case are concerned, it looks to me like they should file suit against the attorney who advised them to go ahead with the suit.

for the Brady bunch

...they should pick this guy:



...he wins a lot.

A firearms manufacturer sued a murder victims family, just one. You can't as it is a lie.

Note to jurors for when he alerts, I did not say he, I said the story is not true and if I am wrong he will post a link and I will apologize.

After all, he's also just listening to the people.


And invading Iran?


Here's an idea you might ponder: the masses get it wrong a lot.

That's why Iowa Democrats oppose him and it is also why Iowa Republicans support him.

BTW, Trump has been invited to this nations oldest Mosque, the Mother Mosque of America in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027529248

Think he'll have the courage to show up and explain himself to Iowa's Muslim community?

But the abuse of ethnic cleansing by you makes me sick.

In this country and they are not being put into camps or murdered. Ethnic cleansing is want was done during the Holocaust, Bosnia, Crimea, Africa and the middle eats where millions were murdered. You are against the deportation of people that had their day in court with appeals and lost. The court ordered them to leave and they refused. They were apprehended and deported. Every country to be a country has to have immigration rules and laws. You want none and I guess would allow anyone to come here and Stat as long as they want.

And his enforcement of his deportations of people that had their day in court plus appeals and were ordered to leave and did not. Your response to my poll on this was to insult and post many stories from 10-11 years ago from the Bush regime. Disingenuous at best, or trying to be deceptive at worst as you failed to note how they were 10 plus years old.

Including children born right here in Iowa.

A small Iowa community loses half it's population in a single year, and you call our concerns disingenuous.

That's disgusting.

President Obama? The adults knew the risks coming here illegally. Would you rather just the children stay here? The adults had their day in court with appeals and were denied and ordered to leave. I see once again you are trying to confuse people.

They all had their day in court. I guess president Obama hates Iowa too. Are you saying he does?

Do you have a link

President Obama's immigration program and the deportations going on now. You are the one that only posts anything that was 10 years ago under President Bush. You fail to answer any of my questions if this is happening now under President Obama. You are the one trying to confuse people. I just post I agree with President Obama and I dislike your stretching of ethnic cleansing past the braking point.

Ethnic cleansing that you apparently support, along with Trump.

Under President Obama. Keep up the name calling and insults a you want. Are you saying president Obama is doing ethnic cleansing and is just like Trump? WOW!

Why would I blame him.

It appears from your own posts you say he is like Trump and is engaging in ethnic cleansing.

Note to jurors since I expect to be alerted on. Context is the poster I responded to has posted ethnic cleansing is happening in Iowa under President Obama and says those are the same views Trump has.

Wow, that is very intellectual. So just what I have said is not true?

I did not blame anyone. I agree with his deportations of people that had their day in court plus all appeals and were ordered to leave.

So I will ask you for like the sixth time, did the raid you are talking about happen under President Obama?

My guess is no, as everything you posted the other day was in 2007-2008 under bush.

When Bush was president and I never said I supported Bush's raids did i? So just who is not being truthful?

On Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:12 PM an alert was sent on the following post:

They were railroaded. Why are you supporting this? Do you hate Iowa? (nt)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=185164

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

stone space is trolling this thread, he's insulted other DU'ers, he's lied about what others have said, he's twisted words around to distort what was actually said.
stone space has a clear history of this behavior and needs a lesson in civility by having this post hidden, maybe then he'll alter his behavior.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sun Jan 17, 2016, 05:19 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Voting to hide based on the totality of posts in thread.

Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Talk about trolling, the alerter should understand the nature of what was triggered by their own repeated posting, baiting. And, by the way, there's nothing over the top in responding whether you hate one of the states that has reacted to immigration this way.

Leave it alone and move on.

Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I do not know if any of that is true. However, this post is within DUs Community Standards and not hideable. There are several insulting posts in this thread, perhaps Duckhunter should tone it down or simply not respond.

Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't even understand what the complaint is about here. I reviewed the thread and didn't see anything suggesting troll-like activity.

Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: Agree that this poster is trolling with "Do you hate Iowa."

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

...the alert was due to you talking to yourself, as you're doing now.

I've seen folks reply to their own OPs with updates.
I've seen folks kick their OPs.
I consider replying your own reply as 'talking to yourself'.

YMMV

...click on the link from the jury results, and hit reply on the post.

The procedure is the same no matter who authored the post.

The only exception is if the post in question is hidden, in which case I tend to look for a close by post by the same author.

If I can't find one, I'll hit reply to any nearby post.

Not sure what your procedure is.

But that's mine in a nutshell.

...I usually don't post jury results.

Including me...

I did not alert, lol

That has happened to me by a host. Of course Skinner says this does not happen.

I very rarely alert as I know that people will not agree and I am insulted by people almost daily. You should know. Someone insinuated I was a racist, that I lie and I am an ASS. Not to mention ammosexual, gun humper and have pictures of gun lockers directed at me. You see I have fairly thick skin.