What's with the right wing source?

Keep it away from her, the mere sight might make her melt, like a splash of water on the Wicked Witch of the West.

Next thing you know, they'll want to let that low down Bill of Rights in too.

"Lets talk about what I'm proposing..."

"Lets not talk about whether I'm actually authorized to do so, and lets definitely not talk about it if what I'm proposing is forbidden".

reported this as poorly as everyone else other than gun blogs. But then, it isn't like he is going to attract a higher quality of journalist than anyone else.
It doesn't expand anything, it simply copied and pasted current law since 1986. If you buy a gun and "flip it", you are in the business. that is what the law has said for nearly 30 years even though few people may have not been aware of it. Maybe that is the important part, it is a little known provision so perhaps that education is important. It reminds me of another little known law.
Every now and then, I hear old timers, really old timers, talk about the good old days when they could send handguns through USPS. Little did they seem to know that they were violating the little known Mailing of Firearms Act, aka the Miller Act, that was signed by Calvin Coolidge in 1927.

If the EAs are no big deal, why is the NRA and Republican politicians blowing them out of proportion you ask? To paraphrase a line from Spaceballs
Fund raising, Fund raising, Fund raising, Fund raising, Fund raising, Fund raising

....from the bottom of my heart, thank YOU for showing how the controllers hate the constitution and can't stand the fact that it is an obstacle to their stripping a civil right away.

Thanks!

“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article VI, clause 3

"The founders decided to require an oath for federal and state officials—absent a religious test—in the Constitution, but the specifics—such as the wording of the oath—were left to the First Congress (1789–1791). In its first act, Congress specified the wording: “I, A.B. do solemnly swear or affirm (as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.”


Seems constitutionality of any measure, well-reasoned or otherwise, should be argued.