Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumMississippi Sen. favors allowing armed security in churches
Source: Associated Press
MARCH 29, 2016 5:33 PM
Mississippi Sen. favors allowing armed security in churches
BY JEFF AMY
Associated Press
JACKSON, MISS. Asked to choose between a Christian spirit of peace and a "God-given right" of self-defense, Mississippi senators Tuesday overwhelmingly favored the latter.
The state Senate passed voted 36-14 in passing House Bill 786 (http://bit.ly/1ZIUFLb ), known as the Mississippi Church Protection Act. The senators sent it back to House counterparts for further work.
Under the bill, places of worship could designate members to undergo firearms training and carry guns to protect the congregation.
Notably, it also goes beyond church security and would allow people to carry guns in holsters without a state concealed weapons permit, a feature that drew opponents' criticism. That would expand on last year's state law allowing people to carry guns in purses or briefcases without a permit.
The measure also asserts that no state official can enforce any federal executive order or administrative rule that violates the constitutions of Mississippi or the nation, challenging the principle that federal law overrides state law.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Mississippi Sen. favors allowing armed security in churches
BY JEFF AMY
Associated Press
JACKSON, MISS. Asked to choose between a Christian spirit of peace and a "God-given right" of self-defense, Mississippi senators Tuesday overwhelmingly favored the latter.
The state Senate passed voted 36-14 in passing House Bill 786 (http://bit.ly/1ZIUFLb ), known as the Mississippi Church Protection Act. The senators sent it back to House counterparts for further work.
Under the bill, places of worship could designate members to undergo firearms training and carry guns to protect the congregation.
Notably, it also goes beyond church security and would allow people to carry guns in holsters without a state concealed weapons permit, a feature that drew opponents' criticism. That would expand on last year's state law allowing people to carry guns in purses or briefcases without a permit.
The measure also asserts that no state official can enforce any federal executive order or administrative rule that violates the constitutions of Mississippi or the nation, challenging the principle that federal law overrides state law.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.sunherald.com/news/state/mississippi/article68803307.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 2014 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mississippi Sen. favors allowing armed security in churches (Original Post)
Eugene
Mar 2016
OP
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)1. Matthew 26:52
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)2. Luke 22:36
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)3. Thank you
One of the main proofs that the original "Jesus" of the Jesus cult was actually two different people. When they wrote the scriptures post facto, they conflated the two.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)4. That name. You keep using that name.
I do not think it names who you think it names.
ileus
(15,396 posts)5. Ileus 1:1 No one cares for my life and family more than me.
It's my moral obligation to keep us safe.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)6. I BELIEVE IN ILEUS!! PRAISE ILEUS!!
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)7. Isn't this really a church/state separation issue?
the wall is meant to keep the State out of the Church as much as it is keeping the Church out of the State.
Where is the compelling State interest in telling a church, mosque, etc. what their security procedures can or can't be compared to, say, the local Lions Club?
AFAIC, the Christian spirit of peace vs the natural right of self defense are not mutually exclusive, unless you are a pacifist. Either way, that is for the Church to decide, not the State.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)8. Ah, AP. You can tell its professionalism widda 1st sentence.