Gun Control & RKBA

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts) Mon Apr 11, 2016, 11:48 PM Apr 2016

RIP 2016 Maryland Gun Control Bills....

Maryland's state legislature loaded up the legislative bong with all kinds of off the wall gun control proposals this legislative session.

The state Bloomberg backed controllers pushed the following "sensible, common sense" legislation:

1) Toy gun ban
2) Universal background checks for rifles/shotguns (handguns already require background checks)
3) Terror watch list bill
4) Ban on campus carry (CCWs were NOT excluded from this proposed law)
5) A bill that would treat antiques as modern firearms for regulatory purposes

...And several other pieces of crap, like a domestic violence bill that didn't make sense as it was actually weaker than existing federal law...the sad thing is that the antis couldn't be bothered to take an inventory of existing laws.

And guess what? They all failed as of an hour ago under Democratic super majorities in the state house and senate. Is this the tipping point?

I'll update this post as the news outlets and antis hear the "bad news." Day in and day out, pro-rights individuals made calls, testified on bills, wrote letters, met with legislators, protested, made more calls, sent donations, etc. The controllers showed up one day on a Bloomberg charter bus, only to be heard from periodically via Facebook.

P.S. in the coming days I will spotlight these big wins in Oregon, Virginia, Maryland, and several other states that accomplished big things this legislative season.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

RIP 2016 Maryland Gun Control Bills.... (Original Post) Kang Colby Apr 2016 OP

man o man... virginia mountainman Apr 2016 #1

Under federal law aren't background checks required JonathanRackham Apr 2016 #2

Not necessarily Lurks Often Apr 2016 #4

There is no CCW in Maryland Lurks Often Apr 2016 #3

Or unless you are a criminal TeddyR Apr 2016 #5

"5) A bill that would treat antiques as modern firearms for regulatory purposes" beevul Apr 2016 #6

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)

1. man o man...

Reply to Kang Colby (Original post)

Tue Apr 12, 2016, 12:15 AM

Apr 2016

I bet some of our local gun control advocates regret saying "tipping point"...

But yea, as you have alluded too, lots of good news in the states..

JonathanRackham

(1,604 posts)

2. Under federal law aren't background checks required

Reply to Kang Colby (Original post)

Tue Apr 12, 2016, 05:36 AM

Apr 2016

for long guns and shotguns?

Why the redundancy redundancy?

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)

4. Not necessarily

Reply to JonathanRackham (Reply #2)

Tue Apr 12, 2016, 07:15 AM

Apr 2016

Background checks are required for any gun sold by a FFL or that crosses state lines. In state sales between private citizens that reside in the state are governed by state law which varies from state to state. I am inferring from the OP that in MD private sales of handguns require a background check, but private sales of rifles and shotguns do not require a background check.

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)

3. There is no CCW in Maryland

Reply to Kang Colby (Original post)

Tue Apr 12, 2016, 07:11 AM

Apr 2016

unless you are well connected. While the law may in theory allow for CCW, in reality permits are almost never issued. NJ, NYC, parts of MA and CA are the same way.

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)

5. Or unless you are a criminal

Reply to Lurks Often (Reply #3)

Tue Apr 12, 2016, 10:18 AM

Apr 2016

Who ignores any type of gun control law. So law-abiding citizens in Maryland are unarmed and unable to protect themselves.

beevul

(12,194 posts)

6. "5) A bill that would treat antiques as modern firearms for regulatory purposes"

Reply to Kang Colby (Original post)

Tue Apr 12, 2016, 10:36 AM

Apr 2016

"5) A bill that would treat antiques as modern firearms for regulatory purposes"

With all the black powder crime out there, who can blame them?

In all seriousness, I would not be the least bit surprised to see this sort of thing pushed harder for in the future.

Controllers gotta control.

Reply to this discussion