Really good.

In Wyoming, it is a crime without the cleric's written permission.

unlike bars, which have to be licensed by the state to serve alcohol, I would think the Church would have the say on whether they permitted CCW or not

In Wyoming, it is a crime without written permission from the church PTB. I think the State should only be involved to enforce trespass law if the cleric chooses, but the default should be the Church's policy and State not care.

place of worship. One bans concealed-carry, one bans open-carry. The restaurant I am in now has them, another has neither sign, yet another is improperly posted.
Doesn't matter to me. Gvernment regulation in this instance is rather inconseqential. If I am not mistaken, all the school shootings in this country were committed in "gun-free" facilities. In fact, I oppose regulations which advertise that fact.

A meeting hall can allow or deny guns at the discretion of its members, owner, bylaws, whatever, but in Georgia, churches are Special Places Under God and are therefore not subject to the same rules as regular buildings.

I believe there is indeed a 1st Amendment issue when the state designates special religious rules for churches vs. other voluntary private assemblies, because such rules fail to treat them equally under the law.

Most states (including most blue states) allow church carry on the same basis as carry in any other private building, e.g. allowed if the building owner/organization allows it and prohibited if they do not allow it, and do not make "religious vs. secular" distinctions.

They should also allow liquor and strippers in churches, mosques, synagogues, Druid oak groves etc

#justsayin

if they allowed strippers. Then again, the mass pearl clutching would be fun to watch. Both are allowed by law, or at least the same rules apply to the local Lions Club or VFW. I'm not saying the cleric has to allow anything in his church, all I'm saying is that the government doesn't have any business telling him he can or can't.

Why shouldn't she be allowed to attend just like everyone else?

Your bigotry is showing...

members may bring wine or beer into *their* building for socials, and the state tells them they can't because $DEITY disapproves of alcohol, we have a First Amendment problem. If Moose Lodge or VFW members can decide to allow alcohol socials in *their* buildings, then so can Pastafarians, Lutherans, Jews, or Unitarians. Or atheists. The state has no business making a distinction, IMO. The same goes for your suggestion of mandatory dress codes; enforcing Baptist dress codes on pagans would be a 1stA violation. Baptists can set their rules, and Druids/Wiccans/Unitarians/whoever can set theirs.

That's not progressive.

That said, the few states I have lived in, none had such a ban.