Nowhere in the article does it actually explain, how "How The NRA Is Making Bank Off Of Urban Gun Violence".

Thanks for the confirmation.

Movies are always true.

Aren't they?

like books do.

Step 1: Trumpet the right the bear arms.

Step 3: Profit.

What part is unclear?

That the NRA is profiting from urban gun violence. Is the NRA selling guns?

Isn't the NRA a non-profit?

This past weekend, Mother's Day weekend, we had 50 shootings and of them, 9 fatal. On track for the highest rate in 20 years.

5 neighborhoods make up 90%+ of those shootings. For details and regular updates; http://heyjackass.com/

So it must be a big jump in membership and maybe a bunch of gang-bangers signing up for Range Safety Officer courses?

But it is "possible" that the drug gangs are sending big contributions to the NRA-ILA lobbying organization.

that called Maajid Nawaz a "porch monkey"? Or was it one of his employees?
https://www.quora.com/What-is-regressive-left-and-who-are-its-examples
My bad, it was one of his employees. Did Greenwald fire the racist fuck?
http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/45048_Writer_for_the_Intercept_Calls_Daily_Beast_Columnist_a_Porch_Monkey

See, I can do the genetic fallacy too. Now that I vented, let's look at some of the substance behind this appeal to emotion and race baiting bullshit based on speculation nothing from someone who knows what they are talking about.

Either way, the trailer is full of shit. The money comes from millions of grassroots members.

as an excuse to go after the peaceable, noncriminal, and nonviolent, and to take from them the kinds of guns that are least involved in the violence.

Your top priorities are to outlaw rifle handgrips and magazines that stick out, and restrict where people with CCW licenses can carry. Why? Other than having completely lost sight of what you are supposed to be fighting for?

Do you yourself support, or oppose, bans on "assault weapons" and over-10-round magazines?

minded and foolish. THEY'RE COMING TO TAKE OUR GINS AWAY!!!1!1!4!

Off my Bombay!

Do you oppose banning "assault weapons" (aka "OUR GINS" in your phraseology) or do you support banning them (e.g. "coming to take them away" a la Australia)?

Seeking to outlaw rifle handgrips/magazines that stick out, when all rifles put together kill fewer people than bicycles annually, shows that the priority is not, in fact, reducing violence. It is reducing gun ownership, completely disconnected from all questions of violence and the reduction thereof.

The "closed minded and foolish" position in this debate is, IMO, ignoring the actual facts of gun use and misuse in this country, and eschewing all pragmatism and common ground in favor of Holy War.

They sure don't seem to now.

this is a white thug

Willing to sell narcotics and kill over business matters, but for some reason gangsters would be willing to follow and abide by firearms regulations? Please. It's almost as ridiculous a notion as the controller beloved "gun free zone".

I could only dream that companies would sale guns at cost.

...........who refuse to accept what indisputable law enforcement stats reveal -- which is that it's the fucking drug trade that's responsible for most of the gun deaths in this country. (edited to add: and suicide -- which they quietly blend with total gun homicide)

They keep trying to convince the public that concealed carry/open carry, "assault weapons", "gun show loopholes" etc. are to blame.

And the "bank" I'm referring to are the thousands of gullible/subservient minds that they're able to add to their 'collection'. The only problem is, it's getting harder and harder to control the narrative given the availability of facts on the net, and the fact that every day honest citizens watch Controllers get their asses handed to them by pro-rights citizens who are able to back up their assertions with links to FBI data. (for example)

The first six years of Obama's presidency saw record annual gun sales.

Part of your problem is that you and the members of your movement see ANY gun control law as "common sense", and thus see any opposition to your ideas as "profits over people".