"...dressed in a cap-sleeve dress by Rubin Singer."

Actor or not she gets an opinion like anyone else

... is worth no more than anyone else's. It's not newsworthy, but since she's a celebrity, her opinion will get promulgated by the media. IMO, that's bullshit. I'm not in favor of non-political public figures using the limelight to push their beliefs.

But thanks for trying to put words into my mouth. Have you got a reply to anything I actually said, or are you going to just stick with responding to things I didn't say?

When you or anyone else here accepts the myriad of studies that show more guns means more violence I'll give your studies blaming movies and video games the consideration they deserve.

ignored and made light of? It's a waste of my time and yours. Facts never seem to get in the way of man-gun love.

See post 23 for evidence.

... an argumentum ad hominem, or just a gratuitous insult?

Whatever it is, it isn't a substantive response.

welcome to ignore.

They proudly increase their ignore list every few days to avoid embarrassing questions and facts, they have made a habit of ignoring any and all requests for any facts to back up their random assertions, claiming, "I already showed it" and ... their most recent posts have been reduced to the absurd and trite;

"If only (fill in the blank) had their own gun" (Which only gun grabbers seem to embrace)

And the equally stupid ... "What could possibly go wrong" every time a more liberal gun law (constitutional carry, carry in churches, campus carry, et. al.) is passed.

Then, when nothing happens, they skulk back to Bansalot for a while to be applauded by both regular posters and come back with the same ole tripe. Always winding up with the assertion that we're all wrong and they are morally, ethically and intellectually superior.

That's how these intellectual giants manage to ignore the results of the 2013 CDC study the President ordered but still claim the CDC can't do any gun related research because of the all powerful NRA.

Hell even Bansalot's latest version of a host has disappeared again. You know, the same one that our host finally banned for being a jerk and after he begged Skinner for his own group then posted gun cartoons?

Still waiting for that Georgia body count from the "Guns Everywhere" law they told us would leave blood in the streets .... again.

Up here, he could at least lie to his hearts content about guns and gun owners and at least got some feedback (even though it infuriated him that he couldn't shame anyone).

Back in his safe space, they go for days and even a week at a time and nobody shows up.

But one of their little lost lambs has returned, after being shamed out for a while, so maybe it will get weird and funny again.

But probably they'll just get angry. They really just look forward to banning anyone that shows up, even people with a curious neutral stance.

In the pre tantrum days the Lost Bubba was responsible for a third of the posts in the group. Now that he has removed his self-imposed ban he should easily be able to account for 50 to 75% of the posts.

It will also help since the missing host has endorsed meta posting whining about Skinner, they have a whole new category to discuss.

Apparently alerted on an emoji that a jury allowed to stand. (I agree it is in poor taste) He then went to ATA to complain but Skinner simply referred to the jury. Rather than leaving it at that he ran home to whine about it to his fellows.
A long-lost host came back to endorse the Meta whining and give the stamp of approval to it. http://www.democraticunderground.com/126210569

Apparently the host was alerted because somebody made an sop alert I suppose wondering if whining is considered advancing gun control. It seems to me anyone who would be labeled " One of our resident gun humping assholes " would already be aware whining is an integral part of gun control.

That poster doesn't have an ox to gore. No sir.

(Too bad I can t put a thingie in a title.)

No matter who hosts, they're still cheap, lazy hypocrites.

And why won't you answer this question?

... but they ask about the health system.

If there's anything that makes us look uncivilized, anything that "makes us scared", it's the medical treatment of people.

I have to answer a series of questions to buy a gun. That's nothing compared to the questions I have to answer to get a cut stitched.

I wonder why her beliefs didn't stop her from taking the part, using guns on camera, or cashing her check from the producers?

That would have been a perfect place to make a principled stand.

Just seems odd that none of the many Hollywood gun control supporters ever get around to turning down a part with gun violence as part of the plot line?

I guess we all have to wait for the press release on; "Jenna Fischer (or any other actor) turns down their 15th part in a row to stand against gun violence".

"antigun, except for the ones *they* or their bodyguards own"

Nothing new under the sun...

That they do not hold those principles very high.

... like a high paying part in the next blockbuster violent movie or inhibit their paid, gun toting security.

Whaaat?

"My peers are the moms in the pickup lines at my son’s school, and I make sure to say things like, before I drop my son off on a playdate, I say, "Do you have a gun in your house? And how do you keep it stored?" It's the same thing if I drop my son off on a playdate and I see a swimming pool, I’ll say, "Do you have a gate for that?" I feel like asking those questions is OK. We need to erase this stigma of asking questions to protect our children."

While the plural of anecdote is not data, I've never heard of anyone being reluctant to ask about guns when their kids go to new houses -- or they don't worry about it.

so its smart of her to ask about those gates.

and who can do it best???

Right.


The brady bunch and the rest are about as "moderate" as the WBC.

Seems like s nice person.

...Doesn't he have one of those peculiarly rare licenses in Cali?

Because coincidentally, nobody but rich and famous people ever seem to feel "threatened" you know, by an abusive ex, or a neighborhood gang.

And amazingly, none of these threatened people ever bother to show actual threats, beyond a few anonymous Facebook posts that they might have created themselves.

Funny how nobody ever investigates or prosecutes the threatening people or groups as long as they get their permits to carry?

You'd almost think they were full of crap?

I wonder if the Grabbers think he needs a collection for self defense...or if they just look the other way because "the rich will always be able to become armed and protected one way or another".

For having a lazy script writer.

He didn't even try to change the script. All of the buzz words are there in order even, epidemic of violence, internet gun sales, common sense, bad-apple gun dealers... The only thing he did to freshen it up was to add that line about being a moderate organization. Credit where due, that was funny.

Otherwise, you would have taken my suggestion to call out Kamala Harris for the felony-shitty job she's done in California.

http://213ajq29v6vk19b76q3534cx.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Special-Feature-K-Harris.pdf

Ready for you to employ the genetic fallacy once again to dismiss this meticulously cited article, since you can't deal with the truthful content.