Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumFacebook struggles to stop network use for illicit weapons sales, kidnapping and extortion
America is a leading exporter of not only weapons but also social media services and at least one major provider is finding itself caught in the crosshairs, so to speak. Menlo Park, CA-based Facebook Inc. (NASDAQ:FB) has been singled out in the past for its role in serving as a platform where individuals can conduct illicit sales of firearms. In February of 2014, Facebook was handling calls from gun control advocacy groups who wanted further crackdowns on gun sales on Facebook. Facebook responded that March by unveiling a public service campaign encouraging private gun sellers to perform background checks and inform them of pertinent local and state laws.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and the rest of the company have tried to stay out in front of the issue that its social media platform could be used as a place for terrorists and non-state armed militias to conduct illicit trade. In January 2016, the company announced that private gun sales would be banned on both the flagship social network as well as Instagram, although the ban did not apply to licensed gun dealers conducting sales off of Facebook.
It doesnt appear that those private gun sale bans have had much in the way of any actual effect, unfortunately. In March 2016, Forbes reported that it had been tracking gun sales on private Facebook sites for weeks in some pretty blatant violations of Facebooks supposed ban on private sales. A recent article in The New York Times reports on a study performed by arms and munitions research firm Armament Research Services shows 97 attempts at unregulated weapons transfers have been attempted by Libyan-based Facebook groups since September 2014. Facebook responded by shutting down six of seven identified groups exhibiting suspicious behaviors related to weapons trafficking; the seventh group reportedly forbade sales of weapons although it allowed discussions of them.
Militia groups are able to leverage Facebooks social media platform for weapons sales by creating closed or secret groups, some of which had nearly 14,000 members. Sales are reportedly carried out through telephones or private messages and most sellers are in their 20s or 30s. As the Forbes article cited above notes, even on American soil its pretty clear that private gun sales are happening through private messages, like Facebooks own Messenger service, provided that group administrators give lip service to the terms of Facebooks gun sale ban by prohibiting public advertisements.
http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/05/07/facebook-used-for-illicit-weapons-sales-intimidation-in-central-america-north-africa-and-middle-east/id=68939/
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and the rest of the company have tried to stay out in front of the issue that its social media platform could be used as a place for terrorists and non-state armed militias to conduct illicit trade. In January 2016, the company announced that private gun sales would be banned on both the flagship social network as well as Instagram, although the ban did not apply to licensed gun dealers conducting sales off of Facebook.
It doesnt appear that those private gun sale bans have had much in the way of any actual effect, unfortunately. In March 2016, Forbes reported that it had been tracking gun sales on private Facebook sites for weeks in some pretty blatant violations of Facebooks supposed ban on private sales. A recent article in The New York Times reports on a study performed by arms and munitions research firm Armament Research Services shows 97 attempts at unregulated weapons transfers have been attempted by Libyan-based Facebook groups since September 2014. Facebook responded by shutting down six of seven identified groups exhibiting suspicious behaviors related to weapons trafficking; the seventh group reportedly forbade sales of weapons although it allowed discussions of them.
Militia groups are able to leverage Facebooks social media platform for weapons sales by creating closed or secret groups, some of which had nearly 14,000 members. Sales are reportedly carried out through telephones or private messages and most sellers are in their 20s or 30s. As the Forbes article cited above notes, even on American soil its pretty clear that private gun sales are happening through private messages, like Facebooks own Messenger service, provided that group administrators give lip service to the terms of Facebooks gun sale ban by prohibiting public advertisements.
http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/05/07/facebook-used-for-illicit-weapons-sales-intimidation-in-central-america-north-africa-and-middle-east/id=68939/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1466 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Facebook struggles to stop network use for illicit weapons sales, kidnapping and extortion (Original Post)
SecularMotion
May 2016
OP
Straw Man
(6,771 posts)1. Libyan arms dealers?
How are they relevant to RKBA in the USA? And why does the headline prioritize weapons sales over kidnapping and extortion?
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,577 posts)2. Another one rides the...
...
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)3. This appears to be a foreign policy post. Why is it here?
DonP
(6,185 posts)4. OP Google Fu needs fine tuning?