Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

CompanyFirstSergeant

(1,558 posts)
Wed May 11, 2016, 06:04 PM May 2016

Civil trial over Colorado theater shooting security begins

Nine months after the Colorado theater shooter was sentenced to life in prison, some victims are returning to the same courtroom in hopes of holding the company that owns the suburban Denver movie theater accountable for not doing more to prevent his bloody rampage.

In a civil trial starting Monday in state court, 28 victims' families say Century Theaters should have had armed guards at the packed opening of the Batman film "The Dark Knight Rises" and alarms that would have sounded when James Holmes slipped into the darkened auditorium through an emergency exit and opened fire, killing 12. Jurors will be asked determine if, in an age of mass shootings, the theater should have foreseen the possibility of an attack.

The families will argue Cinemark knew the midnight blockbuster would attract at least 1,000 people and should have had guards patrolling the parking lot, where they might have seen Holmes suiting up in head-to-toe body armor in his car. The lawsuit says theater employees failed to check doors, lacked closed-circuit television cameras that would have allowed them to spot trouble and did not intervene as victims lay wounded and dying in the aisles.

Theaters across the country had extra security for the July 20, 2012, premiere, and the Century 16 theater in Aurora typically had guards Friday, Saturday and Sunday nights, said New York attorney Marc Bern, who is representing 27 of the families. The premiere fell on a Thursday.

"We believe if these precautions had been in place, the shooting would have been deterred and prevented," he said.



Will we see the proliferation of armed security in businesses across the nation if the theater is held liable?

Would unarmed security have been effective, or would guards have been at too much risk by being unarmed?

Could armed security have prevented this tragedy?

Any other comments?


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-colorado-theater-shooting-civil-suit-20160509-story.html



1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Civil trial over Colorado theater shooting security begins (Original Post) CompanyFirstSergeant May 2016 OP
If I remember correctly (not a safe bet), ManiacJoe May 2016 #1

ManiacJoe

(10,136 posts)
1. If I remember correctly (not a safe bet),
Wed May 11, 2016, 09:14 PM
May 2016

things would have been much better if the staff had been checking the emergency exits to make sure they could not be opened from the outside.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Civil trial over Colorado...