Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another case where the Second Amendment abolitionist were incorrect. (Original Post) JonathanRackham Jun 2016 OP
I don't see what difference it makes to his victim My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #1
...... JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #2
"...and so far, no one has any ideas of how we can prevent these occurrences in the future." pablo_marmol Jun 2016 #3
I can't help but think if it was a group associated with you, you would suddenly care. Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #4
Anyone can snap My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #7
And what -- without infringing rights -- would you like to see? Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #10
If you are the knowegable gun enthusiast My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #17
Just off the top of my head -- Nuclear Unicorn Jun 2016 #22
"...ideas of how we can prevent..." are based on truths and good info... Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #5
The two are not mutually exclusive right wing positions etherealtruth Jun 2016 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #8
What it boils down to My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #9
I'm interested in what you think we should do TeddyR Jun 2016 #11
If you're the gun enthusiast My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #15
If by "gun enthusiast" TeddyR Jun 2016 #21
Take a look at the list of people banned on the 2 opposing groups. JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #24
Thats bullshit, and you knew it was when you wrote it. beevul Jun 2016 #12
Tell us which campaign you would like us to support My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #13
Fucking DUH. beevul Jun 2016 #14
So nothing specifically gun-related then My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #16
Weren't you just crowing about what happens if you don't "use the magic words"? beevul Jun 2016 #18
I SAID My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #19
Thats nice. beevul Jun 2016 #20
I thought UBCs, combined with registration could help, especially with straw purchases jmg257 Jun 2016 #23
NY Safe Act JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #25

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
1. I don't see what difference it makes to his victim
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 06:49 AM
Jun 2016

whether you call him a men's rights activist, an open carry activist, a boy scout or a red-assed baboon.
An unstable, violent dumpster fire of a human being was able to get and use a weapon for a bloody, deadly crime, and so far, no one has any ideas of how we can prevent these occurrences in the future.

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
3. "...and so far, no one has any ideas of how we can prevent these occurrences in the future."
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 10:53 AM
Jun 2016

Alright -- but perhaps a really good first thought would not to do the wrong things. And to STOP LYING. Because doing the wrong things (and lying) only alienates the very people you'll need to assist in the cause of further reducing gun violence.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
7. Anyone can snap
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:06 PM
Jun 2016
http://wonkette.com/592820/open-carry-dude-assaults-wife-kills-two-sons-keeps-second-amendment-safe
Sometimes it's open carry advocates, sometimes it's not. Doesn't matter. No one has lifted a finger to stop these crimes because we have to stop talking about it and get our "terms" right before gun advocates will even deign to start a conversation. And according to gun advocates, the rest of us will never understand, hence we never have to talk about it.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
17. If you are the knowegable gun enthusiast
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:58 PM
Jun 2016

then you should take the lead. What campaigns or legislation should people who don't particularly care about guns,and really are sick of hearing about people getting shot, support?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
22. Just off the top of my head --
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:18 PM
Jun 2016

Reform/abolish the war on drugs

Suicide intervention programs

Better mental healthcare

Focusing on the fact that most killers -- regardless of weapon employed -- have prior criminal histories

Open NICS to private transactions at no cost to seller or buyer

Federal reciprocity

Enhanced funding/enforcement of disqualified purchases

Start treating sellers and owners as allies in interdiction instead of enemies

Low-cost/free safety courses even in schools


At the expense of sounding presumptuous, I'll be bold enough to suggest that most if not all of my proposals would meet with approval or, at worst, minimal opposition from my fellow RKBA advocates.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
5. "...ideas of how we can prevent..." are based on truths and good info...
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 01:20 PM
Jun 2016

When pure culture war is allowed to steer the mentality of some people they will concoct, create, and make up b.s. for the purpose of attack. Do you want people like that in your midst? I don't. But some on DU behave like that daily; in fact, they relish that type of behavior to such an extent I wonder whose side they are really working for. So, b.s., untruths and crap WILL be called out. There is no excuse for it.

etherealtruth

(22,165 posts)
6. The two are not mutually exclusive right wing positions
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 01:32 PM
Jun 2016

It seems the media has identified this sick "eff" as both a "men's rights" and "open carry" nutjob


http://www.rawstory.com/2015/06/iowa-open-carry-nut-gunned-down-mall-worker-who-filed-sexual-harassment-complaints-against-him/

Iowa open-carry nut gunned down mall worker who filed sexual harassment complaints against him



http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/6/14/1393260/-Open-Carry-advocate-guns-down-woman-who-complained-of-sexual-harassment

An Iowa mall cop — with a Facebook account loaded with open-carry and right-wing memes and photos of multiple weapons — is under arrest for shooting and killing a fellow mall worker because she filed sexual harassment complaints against him.


http://www.salon.com/2015/06/15/iowa_gun_nut_shoots_woman_to_death_after_she_files_sexual_harassment_complaint/

Iowa gun nut shoots woman to death after she files sexual harassment complaint

Shooter Alex Kozak's Facebook identified him as "a born free, gun toting, Constitution loving American"

Response to etherealtruth (Reply #6)

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
9. What it boils down to
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:17 PM
Jun 2016

is that people who are interested in guns can't be prevailed upon to care about gun crime or reasonable legislation to stem the tide of stupid, needless slaughter because people who aren't interested in guns never seem to use the magic words.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
11. I'm interested in what you think we should do
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jun 2016

To stem gun crimes. What do you think is reasonable legislation that would make a difference? I'm fine with universal background checks, for example, although I think they'll have a negligible impact.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
15. If you're the gun enthusiast
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jun 2016

and you are in favor of universal background checks, then I'll take your word for it. I'll write in support of that. I think the first step would be to not only lift the ban on gun violence research but to fully fund it without reservations or weird restrictions. I'm fully in favor of establishing good science and taking the recommendations of the best researchers in the field.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
21. If by "gun enthusiast"
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:08 PM
Jun 2016

You mean someone who thinks that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, then yes I am a gun enthusiast.

With respect to the ban on gun violence research, my understanding is that there is no such ban, though I admit that isn't an issue I've focused on. I did a quick bit of Googling and this article from last year seems to indicate that to the extent there ever was a ban (and it doesn't appear there was a ban but only the CDC's interpretation) it is no longer in place - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/storyline/wp/2015/01/14/why-the-cdc-still-isnt-researching-gun-violence-despite-the-ban-being-lifted-two-years-ago/. Here's an excerpt:

The CDC had not touched firearm research since 1996 — when the NRA accused the agency of promoting gun control and Congress threatened to strip the agency’s funding. The CDC’s self-imposed ban dried up a powerful funding source and had a chilling effect felt far beyond the agency: Almost no one wanted to pay for gun violence studies, researchers say. Young academics were warned that joining the field was a good way to kill their careers. And the odd gun study that got published went through linguistic gymnastics to hide any connection to firearms.

The long stalemate continued until shortly after the December 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn., when Obama announced several gun-control proposals, including reversing the CDC research ban. His higher-profile proposals – tightening firearm background checks, reinstating the assault weapons ban – were viewed as impossible to pass into law. Congress wouldn’t bite. But ending the CDC research ban? Done by executive order, it appeared to have the best shot, along with broad support from a scientific community upset that gun violence as a public health problem was being ignored.

“A lot of people thought it would make a big difference,” recalled Jeffrey Swanson, a Duke University psychiatry professor who studies gun violence and mental health.

But today the CDC still avoids gun-violence research, demonstrating what many see as the depth of its fear about returning to one of the country’s most divisive debates. The agency recently was asked by The Washington Post why it was still sitting on the sidelines of firearms studies. It declined to make an official available for an interview but responded with a statement noting it had commissioned an agenda of possible research goals but still lacked the dedicated funding to pursue it.

“It is possible for us to conduct firearm-related research within the context of our efforts to address youth violence, domestic violence, sexual violence, and suicide,” CDC spokeswoman Courtney Lenard wrote, “but our resources are very limited.”


But look, I'm not opposed to studying the root causes of gun violence. I think it would be helpful to better understand the issue so we can better craft meaningful policies.

JonathanRackham

(1,604 posts)
24. Take a look at the list of people banned on the 2 opposing groups.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jun 2016

RKBA vs Activism. One group is open to free speech and discussion of ideas..........

It speaks loads about absolute power, diversity and tolerance.

"Gun Enthusiasts "; some people won't even recognize it as a civil right.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
12. Thats bullshit, and you knew it was when you wrote it.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:43 PM
Jun 2016
What it boils down to is that people who are interested in guns can't be prevailed upon to care about gun crime or reasonable legislation to stem the tide of stupid, needless slaughter because people who aren't interested in guns never seem to use the magic words.


Extrapolating that we "can't be bothered to care" is a huge jump from "we aren't fond of trying to debate with people who can't be bothered to be knowledgeable about the subject matter and seem only to have the worst of intentions where 'we the people who don't commit gun violence and are therefore not part of the problem' are concerned.

I personally will be glad when anti-gun folks decide to try thinking outside the box, and actually accomplish something other than harassing the people that aren't the problem to begin with.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
13. Tell us which campaign you would like us to support
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:47 PM
Jun 2016

I have not seen any gun enthusiasts ever solicit allies in passing any sort of resolutions or legislation to curb gun crimes. So point to one. I'll donate to the cause or write my legislator, or whatever.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
14. Fucking DUH.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 02:50 PM
Jun 2016
I have not seen any gun enthusiasts ever solicit allies in passing any sort of resolutions or legislation to curb gun crimes. So point to one. I'll donate to the cause or write my legislator, or whatever.


Every time one of us supports a Democrat, we are working to solve the root causes of many many gun crimes, and it has nothing to do with gun control.

Reducing poverty, increasing equality, increasing opportunity, fixing the economy.

All those things attack and positively effect that which gun control can not.



 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
18. Weren't you just crowing about what happens if you don't "use the magic words"?
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:01 PM
Jun 2016

And now you're expecting 'magic words' from others whom people like you have done everything to antagonize, alienate, and attack?

Hypocrite much?

So nothing specifically gun-related then


Why does it need to be gun related for you, huh?

just a rude, toilet-mouthed response. kthxbai.



"Fucking DUH" is hardly what I'd call toilet mouthed in this day and age, but whatever helps you ignore the bulk of what I actually wrote, I guess...


 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
20. Thats nice.
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:07 PM
Jun 2016

I said:

Every time one of us supports a Democrat, we are working to solve the root causes of many many gun crimes, and it has nothing to do with gun control.

Reducing poverty, increasing equality, increasing opportunity, fixing the economy.

All those things attack and positively effect that which gun control can not.

You responded by copping out and complaining that there was nothing anti-gun in the above.

You said:

I have not seen any gun enthusiasts ever solicit allies in passing any sort of resolutions or legislation to curb gun crimes.


And now you have, but you're ignoring it because it isn't 'gun control' enough for you.

I SAID KTHXBAI


In case you didn't know it, you're wearing no clothes, Emperor.




jmg257

(11,996 posts)
23. I thought UBCs, combined with registration could help, especially with straw purchases
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:29 PM
Jun 2016

being so prevalent, & to help get rid of illegal guns through attrition.

But then NY passed the safe act to register assault weapons and only like 5% complied.

350+million guns, 90 Million owners. And registration is extremely unpopular, so why pass unpopular laws that will be ignored by vast amounts of otherwise lawful people?


Especially when in places like Chicago, they WHO is responsible for 75-80% of gun crimes.

"In a city of 2.7 million people, about 1,400 are responsible for much of the violence"
Mr. Johnson said, and all of them are on what the department calls its Strategic Subject List.
So far this year, more than 70 percent of the people who have been shot in Chicago were on the list, according to the police, as were more than 80 percent of those arrested in connection with shootings.

“We are targeting the correct individuals,” Mr. Johnson said. “We just need our judicial partners and our state legislators to hold these people accountable.”

JonathanRackham

(1,604 posts)
25. NY Safe Act
Tue Jun 7, 2016, 03:45 PM
Jun 2016

I have a ton of family in NY. They pointed out that two of three of the chief architects of that law have been "convicted " of corruption since that law was passed. The law was also passed without being allowed out for public comment.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Another case where the Se...