Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 12:53 PM Jun 2016

Another instance of a firearm protecting someone, this time from a stalker ex-boyfriend

On three instances, the woman said she came home to find signs of a forced entry. Twice, she had her locks changed. Meanwhile, Gunter [the ex] accrued three outstanding warrants for violating the order of protection.

Despite the new locks, the woman still did not feel safe. She called ADT Security to install a home security system. As the technician finished up the installation of the system on Tuesday, around 3 p.m., the woman went into her bedroom to grab her cellphone.

But the phone had vanished from where she’d left it. If there was a mystery to where it had gone, the reason was immediately — and alarmingly — apparent. A pair of feet poked out from underneath her bed. They were Gunter’s. That was when the woman thought she might die: It was his life or hers, as she would later tell WKRN News reporter Jessica Jaglois.

The woman drew a gun, shot Gunter in his left foot and told the ADT installer to dial the police. WZTV reported that she demanded the now-wounded Gunter give her back her phone, which he tossed to the woman from beneath the bed. She kept him there, weapon trained, until the authorities arrived. Police say he admitted to breaking into the house and stole the phone to prevent her from calling for help.


Link - https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/06/24/fearing-ex-boyfriend-woman-installs-security-system-only-to-find-him-under-her-bed/?hpid=hp_rhp-moretopstories2_no-name%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another instance of a firearm protecting someone, this time from a stalker ex-boyfriend (Original Post) TeddyR Jun 2016 OP
And while she was waiting Uponthegears Jun 2016 #1
Certainly not this woman TeddyR Jun 2016 #2
When faced with the possibility of a real threat of being victimized, she chose correctly. jmg257 Jun 2016 #3
You'd be surprised how many violent felons are repeat offenders. JonathanRackham Jun 2016 #4
While you were sleeping ... Straw Man Jun 2016 #5
I am talking basic,market principles Uponthegears Jun 2016 #10
Makes you wonder why violent crime has dropped so precipitously ... DonP Jun 2016 #11
Thank you. Straw Man Jun 2016 #13
Not imposing restrictions Uponthegears Jun 2016 #14
Weighing. Straw Man Jun 2016 #18
I probably own Uponthegears Jun 2016 #20
So ... Straw Man Jun 2016 #21
Well Uponthegears Jun 2016 #22
The thing is ... Straw Man Jun 2016 #23
So as a gun owner sarisataka Jun 2016 #25
I would prefer Uponthegears Jun 2016 #26
I bet somehow at that time she didn't mind having the ability to save her life. ileus Jun 2016 #6
Why don't you E-mail her and give her an ass chewing for being so selfish... beevul Jun 2016 #12
Typical emotional response Uponthegears Jun 2016 #15
I took it from the anti-gun playbook... beevul Jun 2016 #16
Lol on caption Uponthegears Jun 2016 #17
"Cornucopia of Death Tools." Another punk rock band title! Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #24
How's your foot? (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #27
Guns are designed to save/protect life...it's up to each owner to use it properly. ileus Jun 2016 #7
She had a gun but did not need to shoot sanatanadharma Jun 2016 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2016 #9
And you know she didn't need to shoot HOW? tortoise1956 Jun 2016 #19
Good for her bluestateguy Jun 2016 #28
Just curious here discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #29
 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
1. And while she was waiting
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:05 PM
Jun 2016

for the cops to arrive, how many people died as a result of gun violence, accident, and suicide in a country where the purchase of firearms by people who face little real threat of becoming the victim of violent crime has turned America's streets and living rooms into a cornucopia of death tools.

 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
2. Certainly not this woman
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:26 PM
Jun 2016

Would you prefer she had been unable to protect herself from an abusive ex who threatened to kill her?

And on edit, are you proposing that we limit firearms purchases to those at risk of violent crime? How do you determine who is or is not at risk?

jmg257

(11,996 posts)
3. When faced with the possibility of a real threat of being victimized, she chose correctly.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:31 PM
Jun 2016

Guess she didn't want to take the chance of having to wait for the cops to come, IF she could have called them.

JonathanRackham

(1,604 posts)
4. You'd be surprised how many violent felons are repeat offenders.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jun 2016

Not locked up. The justice system is inefficient and broken.

Suicide is a mental health issue and not a violent crime. That part of our system is also broken.

Some violent felons have their situation compounded with mental health issues (my youngest sisters area of practice); a double whammy for those individuals.

Some mental health issues (along with the crime) are created by individuals who self medicate.

Straw Man

(6,771 posts)
5. While you were sleeping ...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:39 PM
Jun 2016
And while she was waiting

for the cops to arrive, how many people died as a result of gun violence, accident, and suicide in a country where the purchase of firearms by people who face little real threat of becoming the victim of violent crime has turned America's streets and living rooms into a cornucopia of death tools.

Gun violence? Lots and lots, mostly at the hands of career criminals. Accident? Relatively few: they number in the hundreds per year in a nation of 320,000,000 with almost as many guns as people. Suicide? Overall US suicide rates are lower than those in the gun-free paradise of Japan, so arguably there are other factors involved than the availability of firearms.

The "purchase of firearms by people who face little threat"? I assume you're talking about people who purchase firearms for self-defense. These are overwhelming not the people who are perpetrating the violence.

"Death tools"? Really? You need some new clichés.
 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
10. I am talking basic,market principles
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 05:01 PM
Jun 2016

When you increase the number of any item in the stream of commerce, you increase its availability to law abiding citizen and criminal alike. When paranoid suburbanites buy weapons willy nilly because they buy the "bad guy in the bushes" lie, they make it easier for real bad guys to find weapons.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
11. Makes you wonder why violent crime has dropped so precipitously ...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 05:49 PM
Jun 2016

... in spite of record high gun sales for the last few years. The whole more guns more crime thing just hasn't worked out the way some keep claiming.

Maybe your "Bad Guys" are just having trouble finding the right houses?

Straw Man

(6,771 posts)
13. Thank you.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 06:37 PM
Jun 2016
When you increase the number of any item in the stream of commerce, you increase its availability to law abiding citizen and criminal alike. When paranoid suburbanites buy weapons willy nilly because they buy the "bad guy in the bushes" lie, they make it easier for real bad guys to find weapons.

That's as succinct an explanation as I've ever heard of why the activities of all citizens should be restricted because of the behavior of thieves: in other words, absolute nonsense.

Straw Man

(6,771 posts)
18. Weighing.
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 12:54 AM
Jun 2016
Not imposing restrictions

Just asking for prospective gun purchasers to weigh costs vs benefits.

The benefits are actual and immediate, and accrue to the individual. The costs are hypothetical and distant, and accrue (possibly) to the society at large.

But I'm glad to know that you're not here to advocate for gun control.
 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
20. I probably own
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 06:51 AM
Jun 2016

More firearms than 99% of the posters on this site and am probably the only one with a 420 yard (topo, range finder said 390) elk. I have also had to take other people's lives. I know the balance.

My issue is only tangentially with guns, although the connection is admittedly undeniable. My issue is with this myth that the benefits of gun ownership are real. The people who are scarfing up guns like they are baseball cards while they sit out in their suburban enclaves are in virtually no danger. The only benefit they get is "freedom" from imaginary criminals who self-defense advocates have convinced them are right outside the door by telling colorful one in a million stories. That changes the balance substantially.

Straw Man

(6,771 posts)
21. So ...
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 11:01 AM
Jun 2016
I probably own

More firearms than 99% of the posters on this site and am probably the only one with a 420 yard (topo, range finder said 390) elk. I have also had to take other people's lives.

... do you consider yourself part of the problem?

The people who are scarfing up guns like they are baseball cards while they sit out in their suburban enclaves are in virtually no danger. The only benefit they get is "freedom" from imaginary criminals who self-defense advocates have convinced them are right outside the door by telling colorful one in a million stories.

Yet the criminal who steals a gun from them will do the same damage with it as he would with one he stole from you, and neither he nor the society he harms will care what the motivation behind buying it was or what the owner did with it before it was stolen.

People buy guns for a lot of reasons: hunting, collecting, target shooting, plinking/fun, and yes, self-defense. I'm not even sure self-defense is the top reason, but ultimately that's irrelevant.

What I'm hearing from you is that you think your gun ownership is justified while other people's is not.
 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
22. Well
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 12:30 PM
Jun 2016

To be honest, that's pretty accurate. I, like hunters, sport shooters, etc,
have something on our side of the balance. The person who has bought the lie that "those people" are out to get them, have nothing.

Straw Man

(6,771 posts)
23. The thing is ...
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 12:38 PM
Jun 2016
To be honest, that's pretty accurate. I, like hunters, sport shooters, etc, have something on our side of the balance. The person who has bought the lie that "those people" are out to get them, have nothing.

If they have some peace of mind, that's something. And if they go to the range, they have the satisfaction of acquiring a skill, whether they're going to need it or not. Surely you can acknowledge that.

The fact is that "those people" -- thieves, ISIS, et al -- really are out to get them, although the statistical probability of "getting got" is pretty low.

sarisataka

(21,000 posts)
25. So as a gun owner
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 02:02 PM
Jun 2016

Do you feel the Hawaii's action, entering all gun owners into an FBI criminal database http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141500502
should be the national norm?

ileus

(15,396 posts)
6. I bet somehow at that time she didn't mind having the ability to save her life.
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 01:41 PM
Jun 2016

Kind of like I don't mind having the ability to save my life, and my wife doesn't mind having the ability to protect her life. Hell for that matter my kids don't mind having the ability either.

Safety first, dying because you thinks it's the progressive way....never.


 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
12. Why don't you E-mail her and give her an ass chewing for being so selfish...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 06:33 PM
Jun 2016

Why don't you E-mail her and give her an ass chewing for being so selfish, accuse her of having a small penis, and lay those who "died as a result of gun violence, accident, and suicide" at her feet, and let us all know how it turns out.

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
15. Typical emotional response
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 07:35 PM
Jun 2016

These little antectdotes mean nothing when it comes to policy.

Let's assume her life was saved by shooting this scumbag. That is a plus for gun ownership. That plus, however, has to be weighed against the negatives of accidental death etc. The simple fact is that the incidents of defensive gun use in situations where there is an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death is a small fraction of unnecessary gun deaths.

 

beevul

(12,194 posts)
16. I took it from the anti-gun playbook...
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 08:38 PM
Jun 2016

I took it from the anti-gun playbook, fair play and all:

#1: ALWAYS FOCUS ON EMOTIONAL AND VALUE-DRIVEN
ARGUMENTS ABOUT GUN VIOLENCE, NOT THE POLITICAL
FOOD FIGHT IN WASHINGTON OR WONKY STATISTICS.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023396665

(I figured an emotional response was a good reply to an emotional statement, particularly satisfying, since I used your words, to have you accuse me of being emotional. That's just awesome.)

The simple fact is that the incidents of defensive gun use in situations where there is an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death is a small fraction of unnecessary gun deaths.


Another simple fact, is that 2/3 of unnecessary gun deaths are suicides and wont be prevented by gun control.

sanatanadharma

(4,074 posts)
8. She had a gun but did not need to shoot
Fri Jun 24, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jun 2016

I accept that the woman (and many people in our world) was a victim of the evil of our machismo-boy-man dominated culture.
I am glad this story resolved as it did and that it exists to allow gun-lovers an occasional anecdotal story to counter the avalanche of anecdotal stories about our societal-sickness of gun violence, and the insanity of gun-love.
DISARM HATE

Other men were at her home.
She saw the perp's feet sticking out from the bed.
She had the advantage and was not in immediate danger of harm.
She shoots the foot.

She had the gun.
She could have backed away, held the gun on the perp, called out to the workers.
She did not have to shoot, but she did.
Seems to happen too often when people have guns; the NEED to shoot!

This gun-shoot-love disease is a public health problem in America.
Why does any one civilian need 6.5 TONS of ammunition?

Gun-shoot-love creates mental illness.
Or, perhaps mental illness makes people like guns.

Until our nation's leaders can figure out what is happening in our country with gun-lovers, perhaps we need to profile and quarantine them.

Owning a gun is OK. Loving guns is sick. Guns are not fetuses to be honored at all costs.

In future NRAterrorist controlled America perhaps everyone will be expected to be packing, paranoid and have fear of the other and reason to shoot fast and shoot often.
Right now it is only a minority of freaked out people who have chosen to live gun-love lifestyles.

Response to sanatanadharma (Reply #8)

tortoise1956

(671 posts)
19. And you know she didn't need to shoot HOW?
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 01:23 AM
Jun 2016

You were there to see him abjectly surrender before she committed murder upon his poor defenseless foot?

Give me a break. This is a man who had violated orders of protection 3 times, and had 3 outstanding warrants - so, he was a wanted criminal. He was under her bed in the daytime, waiting for her. And you question her shooting him in the foot? What in the name of Murphy makes you think that he would have passively stayed on the floor if she hadn't shot him? Hell, in many states just the act of breaking in, especially with the history of violating protective orders, would be justification for killing him on the spot. The requirement is that you be in fear for your life, and this definitely meets that standard.

I'd be willing to bet that, in Nevada at least, the odds of the case even going to trial would be slim to none. No DA would want to be branded as the idiot who tried to convict a woman for killing a criminal stalker in her own bedroom...

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
28. Good for her
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 05:33 PM
Jun 2016

but it wasn't an AR-15 or a machine gun-lite, was it?

As long as she is law-abiding, she has every right to have that gun and protect herself, so good for her.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Another instance of a fir...