Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumPro-gun group sues Katie Couric for defamation in Under the Gun film
Source: The Guardian
Virginia Citizens Defense League is suing the former
TV news anchor, TV network Epix and director Stephanie
Soechtig over misleading editing
Sam Thielman in New York
Tuesday 13 September 2016 22.53 BST
Pro-gun group the Virginia Citizens Defense League is suing former TV news anchor Katie Couric, television network Epix and director Stephanie Soechtig for defamation over their documentary Under the Gun.
The suit demands $12m in damages following a fruitless round of accusations and half-apologies over the films editing.
In Under the Gun, Couric asks several members of the Virginia-based gun lobby: If there are no background checks, for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun? Nine seconds of silence follow as the interviewees, all of whom are named as plaintiffs, appear to be at a loss for an answer.
But by the VCDLs accounting, and by the film-makers admission, the gun ownership advocates were not in fact silent but answered the question. The VCDL produced an audio recording of the interview published the Washington Free Beacon that does not track with the footage in the movie.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/13/katie-couric-defamation-under-the-gun-documentary
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)That was typical journalistic malpractice.
jonno99
(2,620 posts)virginia mountainman
(5,046 posts)They should pay up dearly for the hack job they "attempted" to pull off.
Bet it still burns them up that some "gun nutz" ended up pwning the heck out of some savvy media elites.
It is an open and shut case, I just wonder what their defence will be? This is the typical end result of believing your own propaganda, especially when Bloomberg's propaganda is involved.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Would not be surprised if they ended up settling
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)this production is rather typical. It goes in the same category of describing someone's "assault rifle," "assault-style rifle," "assault weapon," "military-style assault weapon," etc., while showing a clip of someone shooting a full-auto rifle. Damn, that one still surfaces on crime shows.