Her dildo should be concealed just like the weapons. Is she 21, had a background check, paid the fees and had the required training to carry that concealed dildo?

Please respect DU rules and copyrights, thank you. Have great day.

Please respect DU rules and copyrights. Thank you, have a great day.

Isn't the whole point of wearing the dildo to attract attention?

"Isn't the whole point of wearing the dildo to attract attention?"

"By "attention" you mean a threatening snuff film by some gunhumping MRA?"

Bikini clad women in the office/shop calanders fall into the same category. Work will not tolerate any form of sexual harassment.

He was a flaming asshole and disrespected women grossly. HR laid down the law and he flaunted it. Senior management tossed him. It was clearly a hostile environment and the owners took it seriously. I've worked for 40 years and seen all kinds of ugly situations, the rules are fair, firm and equal. Work space is productive without unnecessary stress.

I know you do not have me on ignore as you choose to respond D to some and post falsehoods.

Please respect copyrights per the DU rules and edit your OPs down to four paragraphs. Have a great day.

And it is nowhere close to victim blaming. As to my other posts, I have to keep asking it as you appear to be ignoring the DU rules on copyrights that I have posted excerpts of and links to. You have at least 4 OPs running that flagrantly violate the DU four paragraph rule. I have pointed it out graciously so you could edit your posts. You fail to take my advice or even respond. All I ask is you please follow the DU rules and not disrespect the administrators and owners. Like I said that could be seen as a TOS violation.

You know that I am unable to even reply, due to the fact that such discussions of forum moderation are in direct violation of DU's TOS.

I will just send a PM to the administrators and take it away from the open. They just should be informed. To bad a simple suggestion has to come to this. I have edited and deleted posts when someone has suggested I went too far. Have a great day.

FYI, I did use my option of alerting

Just because she has a Spanish surname does not necessarily mean she is Hispanic, Latina, or Chicana. She could be Anglo and adopted by or married to a Hispanic. My SIL's maiden name is German, but is married to a Floridian of Spanish decent.

Eom

It just allows the OP to try and divide people. I can't believe he is allowed to flagrantly violate the DU copyright policy either.

"But once I got past the shock and disgust of seeing "my" murder on YouTube and "my" eulogy on Facebook, I could see the video for what it was: useless. The producers shot themselves in the foot, I realized. They effectively exposed themselves as the bad guys with guns. These trigger-happy extremists who spend their free time depicting a 20-year-old Latina’s murder, and then denying it on national media"

Rules about copyrights? Please edit your two OPs. Have a great day.

They are pointing out that openly display of sexual items might be an issue. Of course I think she would win on 1st amendment grounds.

Please respect DU rules and copyrights. You seem to ignore that. Have a great day.

on campus carry. Nothing good about threatening death, or rape, or whatever just to silence opposition. Glad to see she's standing by her guns (or cocks in this case).

And other threats of violence are way over the top and should be dealt with according to law.


Speaking of law why are you not respecting the laws of copyright and intellectual property? As has been pointed out to you has simplified its rules to respect such rights and copyrights.

It is the only reason that I could think of.

And always hope the OP will follow the rules and TOS by following the 4 paragraph copyright rule.

For the OP's character, or lack thereof.

I do recall the OP threatening to have students arrested for not following his class rules. Yet he will not abide by DU written rules or the common decency to respect...

There is a word used to describe those who hold people to higher standards than they are willing to follow themselves.

Does it start with an "H"?

Would you like to spin or buy a vowel?

and blame a conservative if I can't?

Skipping out and not paying for the services rendered if he saw a holstered firearm.

Any death threats are way over the top.

Good question on why the OP feels he can so blatantly ignore the DU rules and fail to act in an ethical manor.

DU.
And DU is allowing this to happen. Therefore do these rules only govern those who obey them? And all others are allowed to run roughshod over them, with no word of reprimand from DU?

Did Brett Sanders make it? If so, he is less of a "gun guy" and more of a garden variety anarchist who prefers trolling to petrol bombs.
https://www.youtube.com/user/bmsanders/videos

If the maker is found out, they should be called out and disowned by both sides of the gun issue.
Oh, and Glock should sue for plagiarism.

Has nobody caught the irony in this video? You know, the part about her not being able to protect herself with a dildo? With the implication that if she had the very item she was protesting against, she might not be dead?

Granted, the video was in poor taste, and it was probably much too graphic for college campuses of today. BUT - violence against women is pretty common, and being able to carry a firearm, or at least have one on campus, will almost certainly help to reduce the number of offenses.

to the Glock commercial. The MDA commercial about the crazy ex-husband had the ladies on The View saying "that makes me want to go buy a gun".
I looked at the Brett Sanders you tube channel. He seems to be an all around anarchist and troll.
http://www.mystatesman.com/news/news/opinion/grisham-anti-gun-group-misleads-public-and-is-out-/nsbLD/

Missed the reference...like much else that happens around me any more...

People have serious issues. They go after this lady for protesting with sex toys, they threaten a firearms dealer with burning down his business for selling smart guns...a person displaying this type of mental instability and threatening behavior has no business owing a firearm.

Par for the course.

It's for open display of a sex toy which could trigger other people. Conceal carry means conceal. To protest, the sex toys should also be concealed.

I suppose, then, pro-gun control ads depicting violence are snuff films.

Apparently this ad threatens women with being murdered by a gun for failing to support an agenda that will allow them to be stabbed and strangled.

Surely you do not support such violence directed at women.

...those killed using anything but a gun must be less dead than those killed with a gun.

maliciously make gun control advocates appear unhinged and belligerent.

If I wanted to create a defaming caricature of an opponent I couldn't have created one more accommodating. It's like a self-animating strawman.

Anybody with even an ounce of awareness would realize that pro-gun control groups have created ads with depictions of violence. To claim the ad in controversy in the OP is a snuff film/call to violence is to open gun control advocates to the same criticism and that is would be seized upon. Yet, here we find ourselves mired in just such a predictable scenario.

Surely, nobody is this ideologically blinded that they couldn't foresee this turn of events.

Is it performance art? Someone trolling gun control advocates? This can't be serious.

They are just so blind in their hatred they fail to see it

...that all gun owners share responsibility for all deaths and injuries involving guns.
Are you as quick to call out their behavior as it is quite insulting?

I don't want to be dragged into your personal squabbles with others here.

Just leave me out of it.

Have a nice night.

Please notify law enforcement for investigation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snuff_film

is "a movie in a purported genre of movies in which an actor is actually murdered or commits suicide".

Were you ignorant of that definition or was your inaccurate use of the term intentional?

But it takes some spectacular mental contortions to avoid the obvious point, which is that a dildo won't protect one against an intruder.

nobody should feel ashamed/threatened to express their views. i do not own firearms to threaten others, i desire to protect myself and my loved ones. a firearm allows a small weak person to stand up to a person that is twice their size and stronger/faster than they are.

Simple concept, hard for some to grasp.