Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumIf we have a "right" to have guns, then why do we have to BUY them?
Shouldn't we all have been issued at least one gun---free of charge---on our 18th birthday?
The NRA isn't a "rights" org, it's a business lobby: they should be called the Nutbar Revenue Association!
DetlefK
(16,450 posts)JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)Besides there's always beer.
freebrew
(1,917 posts)Besides, I thought 'happiness is a warm gun'?
JK.
GreydeeThos
(958 posts)In this group there is the free exchange of ideas about the Right to Keep and Bear Arms.
I don't know why I am not issued a military battle rifle with ammunition. It seems like a deficiency in the operation of our Government.
What is your solution to this problem?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)you have to buy your own religious texts and support your own house of worship.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Why is the word right bracketed by parentheses in your post?
jmg257
(11,996 posts)rights to arm.
But they knew that if the govt was responsible for arming the people, they could just as easily DISarm them (by NOT providing the guns).
They figured it was better, & even mandatory, for the people to provide their own arms (and accoutrements).
Which of course worked well with the Constitutional articulations which secured the right for the people to keep (& bear) them.
Constitutionally, the people should have no issues providing themselves with militia-capable arms (and accoutrements) at reasonable cost. Unfortunately that s not always the case these days.
packman
(16,296 posts)As I recall reading somewhere (too lazy to research this) that it was a law - a law - in our early history for each man to have a gun, certain amount of powder and balls (No, not that type). However, it was generally ignored and the law just passed into history.
davepc
(3,936 posts)An ACT more effectually to provide for the National Defence, by establishing an Uniform Militia throughout the United States.
I. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That each and every free able-bodied white male citizen of the respective States, resident therein, who is or shall be of age of eighteen years, and under the age of forty-five years (except as is herein after excepted) shall severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia, by the Captain or Commanding Officer of the company, within whose bounds such citizen shall reside, and that within twelve months after the passing of this Act. And it shall at all time hereafter be the duty of every such Captain or Commanding Officer of a company, to enroll every such citizen as aforesaid, and also those who shall, from time to time, arrive at the age of 18 years, or being at the age of 18 years, and under the age of 45 years (except as before excepted) shall come to reside within his bounds; and shall without delay notify such citizen of the said enrollment, by the proper non-commissioned Officer of the company, by whom such notice may be proved. That every citizen, so enrolled and notified, shall, within six months thereafter, provide himself with a good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a knapsack, a pouch, with a box therein, to contain not less than twenty four cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to contain a proper quantity of powder and ball; or with a good rifle, knapsack, shot-pouch, and powder-horn, twenty balls suited to the bore of his rifle, and a quarter of a pound of powder; and shall appear so armed, accoutred and provided, when called out to exercise or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only, he may appear without a knapsack. That the commissioned Officers shall severally be armed with a sword or hanger, and espontoon; and that from and after five years from the passing of this Act, all muskets from arming the militia as is herein required, shall be of bores sufficient for balls of the eighteenth part of a pound; and every citizen so enrolled, and providing himself with the arms, ammunition and accoutrements, required as aforesaid, shall hold the same exempted from all suits, distresses, executions or sales, for debt or for the payment of taxes.
packman
(16,296 posts)"every free able-bodied white male" and "severally and respectively be enrolled in the militia"- if this is the basis for the 2nd, it does seem to strongly suggest that "militia" meant something different than today's loose interpretation of the word. Would like to see some of our gun bearers today "when called out to exercise or into service, except, that when called out on company days to exercise only".
Also interesting that they would be exempted from suits, distresses, and even the payment of taxes.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,565 posts).-An Act To promote the efficiency of the militia, and for other purposes.
(January 21,1903.)
(public, No. 33.)
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the militia shall consist of every able-bodied male citizen of the respective States, Territories, and the District of Columbia, and every able-bodied male of foreign birth who has declared his intention to become a citizen, who is more than eighteen and less than forty-five years of age, and shall be divided into two classes-the organized militia, to be known as the National Guard of the State, Territory, or District of Columbia, or by such other designations as may be given them by the laws of the respective States or Territories, and the remainder to be known as the Reserve Militia.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Those State entities were well-understood, and pre-existed the Constitution for decades. They were required by the Articles of Confederation, and "inherited" into the new govt organization.
"; but every State shall always keep up a well-regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered,"
The militia were of the state (today there'd be 50), and they HAD TO BE maintained - well-armed and well trained (well-regulated militias were "necessary" . And rightly so - OUR freedoms as outlined in the new Constitution depended on them, made from the body of the people, the militia had very vital roles to fill when called into federal service.
"Congress shall have power...
...To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;"
...To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States"
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence."
These days just about all of us would be subject to 'exercise and service', not just select "gun bearers". "each and every free able-bodied white male citizen..." would of course be much expanded.
The arms we'd need to supply ourselves would be the very ones many want to ban (ARs and hi-cap mags, M-9 pistols etc).
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Not until LBJ, et al, was the Constitution de jure extended to all people. One of the better summations of both Ante Bellum and Jim Crow era laws which prohibited RKBA for blacks was the friend of the court brief in the Heller decision, submitted by Georgia Carry. It surveyed the many laws, state constitutional amendments, and ordinances designed to restrict blacks from owning guns. It seems white Southen state governments well remembered the slave revolts, esp. the Stono Rebellion (1739) when slaves escaped a South Carolina plantation. First stop: A general store for guns.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)With a citizen's militia, well armed and trained, for the purpose of national defense. It would be an opt out, not opt in arrangement. Of course, such a thing would entail disentangling from all our imperial adventures.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)I tend to think that is what the Founders intended.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Hence the creation of the National Guard, a federal entity more like the select militia envisioned by Hamilton, instead of the ones articulated by the early congress and militia acts.
davepc
(3,936 posts)The need for a large federal army with the ability to conduct a sustained invasion into hostile territory did a lot of the chipping away. By the early 20th century the modern national guard system we have today was put in place.
ileus
(15,396 posts)No thanks, I'll buy top quality personal safety devices.
Now on to the real question.....Why the 18th birthday?
stone space
(6,498 posts)And you can hear echoes of this argument whenever anybody proposes a tax on weapons from Trump folks who object to paying taxes, and who feel that having to pay taxes is a violation of their constitutional rights.
Straw Man
(6,760 posts)... shall we put you down as "in favor of poll taxes" then?
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Goofy, that is.
As for taxes, we already pay them on weapons and ammo etc., just like any most other goods. As long as they're not anything crazy like some suggest.
Not sure why trump folk feel guns should be exempt, as well as free...is it part of the whole "its my right" thing??
They want to be part of a traditional Organized Militia, they'd have a bit more of an argument...maybe.
Is it they don't want to pay ANY taxes?? Yet they want free stuff? Weird.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)which went to the general fund until 1937
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pittman%E2%80%93Robertson_Federal_Aid_in_Wildlife_Restoration_Act