Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,579 posts)
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 12:14 PM Oct 2016

Tell me again how violators of new laws will be prosecuted when...

...violators of existing laws are not. Why would that be a reasonable conclusion?

Arrests in Baltimore for illegal guns often lead to dropped charges or little jail time
As Baltimore police and prosecutors race to tamp down a sustained spike in violence, many of the charges against people caught with illegal guns aren't sticking, or defendants are only jailed for a fraction of their sentence.

About one-quarter of such gun cases are dropped before defendants go to trial, according to a Baltimore Sun analysis. Even when convicted of illegally possessing a firearm, prosecutors say defendants are sentenced, on average, to 16 months in jail with a substantial portion of their sentences suspended.

.....

In one case, a 23-year-old man was granted bail after his arrest in the city with a fully loaded revolver and is now accused of fatally stabbing a man in Baltimore County five days after his release. The arrestee had a felony record and faced a mandatory five years in prison on the gun charge.

"There's no certainty of a consequence," Police Commissioner Kevin Davis said of the Baltimore justice system, adding that he believes carrying an illegal gun should be viewed as a "pre-murder" crime.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/crime/bs-md-ci-gun-arrest-prosecutions-20161022-story.html
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tell me again how violators of new laws will be prosecuted when... (Original Post) discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 OP
it is more imperative to punish the moral bankruptcy of assault weapon owners. Marengo Oct 2016 #1
I wonder if the knife used had a... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #2
Sadly, your 'bad science/bad religion' explanation is right on the money. pablo_marmol Oct 2016 #3
"fully loaded revolver" .....LOL ileus Oct 2016 #4
Maybe they were armor piercing... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #5
Assault revolver Duckhunter935 Oct 2016 #6
Crickets from the control oriented crowd. Kang Colby Oct 2016 #8
Any minute there will blood in the streets of those states... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #10
Interesting isn't it Duckhunter935 Oct 2016 #13
I'm a little surprised DonP Oct 2016 #11
I infer there's a boycott... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #12
Perhaps they are suffering the consequences of clams casino. Eleanors38 Oct 2016 #15
Well, I've often thought things with them... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #16
Damn, You called that one. See a few posts down. :) n/t X_Digger Oct 2016 #20
They can't help themselves DonP Oct 2016 #22
Not all murderers are prosecuted, do you oppose laws against that? CreekDog Oct 2016 #17
answers for you discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #19
You answer with deceptive phrasing. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2016 #21
re: "What is the virtue of freeing the violent while disarming their victims?" discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #23
Perhaps, and I know this probably sounds crazy but Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2016 #28
Quite a logical suggestion discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #29
Is your purpose to function as political commissar? Marengo Oct 2016 #24
Ahem... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #25
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #

pablo_marmol

(2,375 posts)
3. Sadly, your 'bad science/bad religion' explanation is right on the money.
Sat Oct 22, 2016, 02:16 PM
Oct 2016

While claiming allegiance to a political party that holds the verdict of empirical evidence sacred, we go 'full hypocrisy' on the gun violence issue. This while insisting there there is little/no political fallout from our dishonesty, denying any dishonesty exists, or putting forth the "argument" that the fallout is worth the price given the "moral correctness" of the intellectually and morally bankrupt positions. Given that Mother Jones has published an article by an author who essentially says precisely what I've just said, and other left-leaning media sources like Salon and Vox have published articles questioning conventional "liberal wisdom" on gun control, it becomes quite dishonest to dismiss these points as right wing talking points.

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/dan-baum-gun-guys-interview

http://www.salon.com/2016/06/20/an_ar_15_ban_wont_stop_mass_shootings_thats_like_regulating_drunk_driving_by_banning_scotch/

http://www.vox.com/2016/6/20/11975850/ar-15-owner-orlando

 

Kang Colby

(1,941 posts)
8. Crickets from the control oriented crowd.
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 08:57 AM
Oct 2016

This story plays out in D.C., Chicago, and so many other places. In fact, prior gun offenses are strongly correlated with homicide suspects.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
11. I'm a little surprised
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 12:18 PM
Oct 2016

Normally by this time we'd have at least one of our control "fans" ranting about "Well, then why have any laws!" as their go to "rationale" for any and every new gun law, whether it is constitutional, actually works, or is ever enforced ... or not.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,579 posts)
12. I infer there's a boycott...
Sun Oct 23, 2016, 01:54 PM
Oct 2016

...due to recent absences and self-deleteds.
Revel in the peace; bask in the agreement.

 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
22. They can't help themselves
Tue Oct 25, 2016, 10:30 AM
Oct 2016

It reminds me of that scene in Roger Rabbit.

When they were trying to find where Roger was hiding and they used the "Shave and a haircut ..." knock to draw him out.

Like the Rabbit, who comes screaming out of the woodwork singing; "TWO BITS!", control fans can't resist deploying one of their shrinking set of pointless bumper sticker memes.

This meme is a close second to the "Fewer gun owners" commandment.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
17. Not all murderers are prosecuted, do you oppose laws against that?
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 03:44 PM
Oct 2016

do you oppose strengthening those laws?



not exactly sure what your purpose on Democratic Underground is, in fact, i never really have been sure, since arguing with you when you posted that government should stop recognizing all marriage right as it was about to be legalized for same sex couples nationwide.

what is it you do here?

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,579 posts)
19. answers for you
Mon Oct 24, 2016, 04:15 PM
Oct 2016
Not all murderers are prosecuted, do you oppose laws against that?
I am in favor of laws against murder. I'm also in favor of not letting violent folks have guns. I'm okay with UBCs. I think it's time to stop fighting the drug war.



what is it you do here?
correspond

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
21. You answer with deceptive phrasing.
Tue Oct 25, 2016, 07:41 AM
Oct 2016

"Not all murderers"

As if this is just a few isolated incidents, things so seldom as to be overall insignificant.

The article isn't about a few people being set free though they can be prosecuted for serious gun crimes, it's about the practice being so habitual as to be a de facto nullification of the law.

Yet, we're supposed to embrace laws that will make peaceable people into criminals or disarmed sheep as we watch violent criminals turned back out on to the streets.

The cynical side of me thinks the pro-Control advocates want violent criminals to be given free rein so they may exploit the ensuing mayhem to argue for gun control. Perhaps you could save me from this cynicism by answering for me:

What is the virtue of freeing the violent while disarming their victims?

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,579 posts)
23. re: "What is the virtue of freeing the violent while disarming their victims?"
Tue Oct 25, 2016, 10:41 AM
Oct 2016

Makes for easy low risk police work, huh?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
28. Perhaps, and I know this probably sounds crazy but
Wed Oct 26, 2016, 05:28 PM
Oct 2016

maybe if violent, armed criminals weren't being turned loose the people wouldn't feel the need to arm themselves.

Then the gun control advocates would see their goal of reduced civilian ownership and they wouldn't even have to pass a law to realize it.

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,579 posts)
29. Quite a logical suggestion
Wed Oct 26, 2016, 06:00 PM
Oct 2016

Violent criminals seem to have no problem arming themselves and not much of a problem being released and even being allowed to buy arms at retail while passing the often touted background check.

It seems to me that if a year or two is reasonable for theft of $1000 to $2000 dollars, 5 to 10 times that ought to be appropriate for violent offenses.

The BGC system seems broken which probably bears some investment. The drug war is giant waste. So much money and effort could do some good.

 

Marengo

(3,477 posts)
24. Is your purpose to function as political commissar?
Tue Oct 25, 2016, 11:15 AM
Oct 2016

Let me guess, no true Democrat disagrees with you on any issue, in any way.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Tell me again how violato...