Care to share your opinion?

the little children who will shoot themselves and other with guns they find.

...children finding more unsecured guns. Is that right?

in the heat of the moment because a gun was handy and all the other stuff that a wild west system enables. Guns are for hunting and target shooting, not companions to one's cell phone, keys and pocket comb.

...next door in Vermont where they've had the same law?
Is NH that different from VT?

in the head with guns they happened upon to prove your point, be my guest. I'd rather no three year-olds got shot in the head because they happened upon a loaded weapon. If there were no loaded handguns in homes that would be the case in both states. Maybe spouses would be beaten or stabbed to death rather than shot and bar fights with beer bottles or pool cues would replace shootings in exactly equal numbers. I doubt it.

When I went on Obamacare I saved enough money to buy a new handgun every month. In the process, I made my home a happier, healthier and safer place.

But now that I am a highly paid protestor, I make too much money to qualify for Obamacare. But at least I can enjoy picking out new teak planking for the boathouse on my private island.

Last edited Mon Feb 13, 2017, 12:26 AM - Edit history (1)

On the one hand, I believe that demonstration of some baseline skill level should be required for the protection of citizens in the event of a defensive gun use. On the other hand, the added expense of such training could be a de-facto ban for the poor who need protection most........as they live in dangerous, drug-infested areas. Cost of gun + safe + training could be a deal-breaker for some. I voted no permit -- which is consistent with my belief that society has an obligation to protect the vulnerable. This would include women, gays, the elderly and handicapped.

Was this the tipping point? LOL


You shouldn't need a permit to excercise a constitutionally protected right.