Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumThe gun-free zone
https://www.policeone.com/active-shooter/articles/295035006-5-things-to-know-about-gun-free-zones/
2. Mass casualty incidents have resulted in pushback against gun-free zones. A common argument against these laws is that they work opposite to how they were intended; instead of keeping the public safer, they prevent law-abiding citizens from carrying but do nothing to stop criminals who intend to do harm.
...
3. Some argue that most mass shootings occur in gun-free zones, and that these sites attract active shooters. Another common argument in this debate is that the majority of mass shootings occur in gun-free zones and that active shooters specifically seek out these sites to carry out their attacks.
...
4. But are these claims true? Heres where things get muddy. In a 2013 report, Mother Jones found no evidence that any of 62 mass shootings that occurred between 1982-2012 were at sites targeted specifically because of a gun ban. Many of the attackers had a personal connection to the site of their rampage, such as their place of work.
...
A big reason its hard to verify whether these claims are factual is because of the various definitions of what constitutes a mass shooting, a gun-free zone, and the differences in gun prohibition from state to state.
2. Mass casualty incidents have resulted in pushback against gun-free zones. A common argument against these laws is that they work opposite to how they were intended; instead of keeping the public safer, they prevent law-abiding citizens from carrying but do nothing to stop criminals who intend to do harm.
...
3. Some argue that most mass shootings occur in gun-free zones, and that these sites attract active shooters. Another common argument in this debate is that the majority of mass shootings occur in gun-free zones and that active shooters specifically seek out these sites to carry out their attacks.
...
4. But are these claims true? Heres where things get muddy. In a 2013 report, Mother Jones found no evidence that any of 62 mass shootings that occurred between 1982-2012 were at sites targeted specifically because of a gun ban. Many of the attackers had a personal connection to the site of their rampage, such as their place of work.
...
A big reason its hard to verify whether these claims are factual is because of the various definitions of what constitutes a mass shooting, a gun-free zone, and the differences in gun prohibition from state to state.
IMO, most mass shooters do not generally choose from a list of gun-free zones as sites for their mayhem. I am fairly sure it crosses the minds of a few of them, after deciding coincidentally on a gun-free venue, that they will face little initial resistance.
>>> I believe that venue owners and operators should have the final decision on whether their property is gun-free.
>>> I believe that venue owners and operators should provide some form of enhanced security if they designate the property gun and/or weapon free.
>>> I believe that counties should share the cost of providing dedicated law enforcement staff with venues over 200,000 square feet. This is in addition to private security.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 2148 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The gun-free zone (Original Post)
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Mar 2017
OP
yagotme
(3,819 posts)1. Did MJ count the 2012 Aurora shooting?
Don't believe it was directly stated, but the perp drove past at least 2 other theaters that were closer to his home, but they weren't gun free zones.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,579 posts)2. I don't know
I wouldn't get my news on gun issues from MotherJones.
yagotme
(3,819 posts)3. Was asking, rhetorically, because of par #4 in your OP,
referencing a MJ "study". I don't get gun news from them, either.