Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Dial H For Hero

(2,971 posts)
Thu Jun 10, 2021, 08:26 AM Jun 2021

Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/09/senate-gun-control-deal-492696

The Senate's latest bipartisan attempt to shape a gun control bill came to an end Wednesday as the Democrat and Republican leading the push for a compromise abandoned their effort.

Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who had spearheaded Democrats’ efforts to find a path forward for gun control, said Wednesday in a statement his discussions with Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) had run their course.

“We haven't been able to get to a bill that would meaningfully increase the number of gun sales that require background checks,” Murphy said in a statement.

But the Connecticut Democrat was hopeful for future compromise.
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate's latest attempt at a gun control deal falls apart (Original Post) Dial H For Hero Jun 2021 OP
Anyone shocked? gab13by13 Jun 2021 #1
""We haven't been able to get to a bill that would meaningfully increase the number of gun sales..." SYFROYH Jun 2021 #2
"... that require background checks." Straw Man Jun 2021 #3
It's still ambiguous. Gun stores want to increase gun sales with checks too. SYFROYH Jun 2021 #4
The only ambiguity is in the word "number." Straw Man Jun 2021 #5

SYFROYH

(34,204 posts)
2. ""We haven't been able to get to a bill that would meaningfully increase the number of gun sales..."
Thu Jun 10, 2021, 01:28 PM
Jun 2021

I had to double-check to make sure this wasn't The Onion.

Straw Man

(6,778 posts)
3. "... that require background checks."
Sat Jun 12, 2021, 02:20 AM
Jun 2021

It's called a restrictive clause. It functions adjectivally to limit the scope of the noun or noun phrase -- in this case, "gun sales."

Straw Man

(6,778 posts)
5. The only ambiguity is in the word "number."
Mon Jun 14, 2021, 03:11 AM
Jun 2021

They want to see an increase in the background-checked subset of all gun sales. The word "number" suggests raw numbers, but it could also refer to types of sales: sales by a dealer, sales between friends, intrastate private sales by non-dealers, etc.

Perhaps the writer should have used "percentage" or "ratio." That would make it clearer.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Senate's latest attempt a...