Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(16,245 posts)
Mon May 20, 2024, 04:55 AM May 2024

US judge blocks Biden-backed rule expanding gun background checks

Last edited Mon May 20, 2024, 09:00 AM - Edit history (1)

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-blocks-biden-backed-rule-expanding-gun-background-checks-2024-05-20/

US judge blocks Biden-backed rule expanding gun background checks

By Nate Raymond
May 20, 2024 4:49 AM EDT Updated an hour ago

May 19 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Sunday blocked the Biden administration from fully implementing a new rule that would require gun dealers to obtain licenses and conduct background checks when selling firearms at gun shows and online.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo temporarily restrained [PDF], opens new tab the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives' rule from being enforced in Republican-led Texas or against members of several gun rights groups.

"I am relieved that we were able to secure a restraining order that will prevent this illegal rule from taking effect,” Texas Attorney General Paxton, a Republican, said in a statement.

The U.S. Department of Justice, which is defending the rule in court, did not respond to a request for comment.

[...]



Link to order (PDF) :
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/gkvllmzgrvb/05192024atf.pdf

STATE OF TEXAS et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v. 2:24-CV-89-Z
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO,
FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES et al.,
Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

[...]
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US judge blocks Biden-backed rule expanding gun background checks (Original Post) sl8 May 2024 OP
American judges have blood on their hands. Irish_Dem May 2024 #1
These are NOT "military grade weapons". yagotme May 2024 #4
Anyone who lives in the United States understands completely what I am talking about. Irish_Dem May 2024 #5
You used the word. I know what it means. yagotme May 2024 #7
Kacsmaryk, yet again. Paladin May 2024 #2
HIM AGAIN!! 2naSalit May 2024 #3
This is the ruling that changes the way ATF defines who needs a FFL. yagotme May 2024 #6
The new law melm00se May 2024 #8

Irish_Dem

(57,309 posts)
1. American judges have blood on their hands.
Mon May 20, 2024, 05:44 AM
May 2024

They allow and even encourage the ongoing slaughter of Americans who are murdered with military grade weapons.

Even though they damn well know our founding fathers did not intend for the good citizens of the US
to be mowed down with impunity as they went about their daily business.

Shame shame shame on American judges.

yagotme

(3,816 posts)
4. These are NOT "military grade weapons".
Mon May 20, 2024, 11:15 AM
May 2024

The military uses full auto. Civilian rifles do not. Full auto weapons MAY be purchased legally by civilians, but an extensive background check is done, taxes, high cost of weapon, etc.

They allow and even encourage the ongoing slaughter of Americans who are murdered with military grade weapons.

Cite, please? Where has a judge "encouraged" someone to go out and shoot someone? I'll wait here while you provide links. Thanks.

Irish_Dem

(57,309 posts)
5. Anyone who lives in the United States understands completely what I am talking about.
Mon May 20, 2024, 11:18 AM
May 2024

American judges have blood on their hands.
They should hang their heads in shame every day.

Snark will not change my mind.
It is the sign of a weak argument.

yagotme

(3,816 posts)
6. This is the ruling that changes the way ATF defines who needs a FFL.
Mon May 20, 2024, 11:26 AM
May 2024

From 1st page of order:

“Definition of ‘Engaged in the Business’ as a Dealer in Firearms”

This rule gives the ATF an arbitrary means to prosecute someone for buying/selling personal firearms. If "too many" are sold during an unspecified time (and TF doesn't say how many are "too many&quot one needs a dealer license. Now, ATF has certain rules and regulations regarding issuing of licenses, so not just anyone can get one. One must have a business area in your home, if you are using your home for the address for your license. Separate access to the outside. Zoned for business. ATF inspects your house prior to issuing license. If any fault is found, no license. So, now, the ATF is telling you, you have to have a license if you buy/sell a "secret" number of guns, in an undisclosed time period, but they may not issue you a license, well, because. Then what? Realistically?

melm00se

(5,053 posts)
8. The new law
Tue May 21, 2024, 06:03 PM
May 2024

would've created an issue with a relative of mine.

Her spouse passed away and she liquidated 10 or 11 firearms and that could have triggered the requirement for her to have an FFL for a mix of 22's and shotguns.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»US judge blocks Biden-bac...