Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rocktivity

(44,885 posts)
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:27 PM Apr 2014

Uproar over Beyonce's Time magazine cover: 'Why is she in her underwear?'

Last edited Wed Nov 29, 2023, 09:09 PM - Edit history (16)

Costume declared inappropriate for one of 'World's 100 most influential people'

...(W)hen Time's 100 Most Influential issue hit newsstands...Queen Bey on the cover, it started an online storm. Twitter was buzzing with angry comments. "Couldn't Beyoncé have worn clothes for her cover?" says one..."I absolutely LOVE Beyonce but that outfit is SO Miley Cyrus," is one fan's response...

"Thigh-high boots, corsets, the teeniest of short shorts may be Beyoncé's look du jour, but do they really have a place on Time magazine's cover?" wrote blogger Brogan Driscoll on the Huffington Post. "Bey says Time magazine's recognition is important 'because it's not about fashion or beauty or music; it's about the influence I've had on culture.' So why does she have to come half-dressed?"

[center][/center]

The other cover stars are Robert Redford, the NBA's first openly gay athlete Jason Collins, and General Motors CEO Mary Barra -- all of whom are fully clothed.

[center][/center]


Well, why SHOULDN'T Beyonce "come half dressed?" Coming half dressed is the way she BECAME "influential!"

It's not Beyonce's fault that the other "cover stars" attained their influence WITHOUT taking off their clothes. Nobody complains about how she's dressed when she's doing precisely what MADE her so "influential." It's her talk of "influencing culture" that's completely off the wall -- she's just the latest to rake in the benefits of the thirty-year old influence that Madonna and MTV have had on culture!


rocktivity
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Uproar over Beyonce's Time magazine cover: 'Why is she in her underwear?' (Original Post) rocktivity Apr 2014 OP
It doesn't look like underwear to me upaloopa Apr 2014 #1
TIME photographed and cropped Beyonce different from the others Auggie Apr 2014 #2
Sales-boosting or not, it makes perfect sense to feature more of Beyonce's body rocktivity Apr 2014 #4
Hopefully there are no Kardashians on that list..n/t monmouth3 Apr 2014 #3
Looks like a swimsuit from 1958 HockeyMom Apr 2014 #5
She is covered up enough, but why... alfie Apr 2014 #6
Hmmm let's see here..beautiful? Check! GOLGO 13 Jun 2014 #7
I see your point but... theexwife Jul 2014 #8
UPDATE: Beyonce labeled partly "Anti-Feminist" and a "terrorist" by feminist scholar rocktivity Jul 2014 #9

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
1. It doesn't look like underwear to me
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:32 PM
Apr 2014

I have pictures of my mom taken in the 50's on picnics and she was wearing something very similar

Auggie

(31,891 posts)
2. TIME photographed and cropped Beyonce different from the others
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:33 PM
Apr 2014

I guarantee it was done to promote magazine sales

rocktivity

(44,885 posts)
4. Sales-boosting or not, it makes perfect sense to feature more of Beyonce's body
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:57 PM
Apr 2014

Last edited Fri Jun 27, 2014, 10:17 AM - Edit history (4)

Because unlike the others, as I said, her "influence" is GENERATED BY her body:




At least Time had enough sense to avoid complaints of racism by giving all the covers the same color scheme:




rocktivity
 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
5. Looks like a swimsuit from 1958
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 03:58 PM
Apr 2014

I had one like that in hot pick when I was 10. Actually, the underwear I now wear is far lower cut than that.

Down right FRUMPY underwear for a young woman of her age.

GOLGO 13

(1,681 posts)
7. Hmmm let's see here..beautiful? Check!
Fri Jun 27, 2014, 10:06 AM
Jun 2014

It's the cross of all devastatingly beautiful women to bear. The misfortune of looking more fantastic than 99.9% of the entire population.

So wait...what is she known for again?

theexwife

(52 posts)
8. I see your point but...
Mon Jul 7, 2014, 10:28 AM
Jul 2014

I have to agree with further responses within the thread touching on the subject of dressing to compliment the whole overall reason why she is on the cover. She isn't a nun and dressing that way is a part of show business. So I say it isn't inappropriate at all given the nature of her profession.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Media»Uproar over Beyonce's Tim...