Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:17 PM Mar 2016

FCC votes to “unlock the cable box” over Republican opposition



The Federal Communications Commission today approved a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that seeks to give consumers more choices in the set-top boxes they use to watch cable TV.

The vote was 3-2, with Chairman Tom Wheeler and fellow Democrats Mignon Clyburn and Jessica Rosenworcel voting in favor of the proposal, while Republicans Ajit Pai and Michael O'Rielly voted against. An NPRM is not a final vote. Instead, this will kick off a months-long public comment period leading up to a final vote that is likely to happen before the end of this year.

The FCC is essentially trying to create a software-based replacement for CableCard. Pay-TV operators from the cable, satellite, and telco industries would have to provide content and programming information to makers of third-party hardware or applications. Theoretically, customers could then watch their TV channels on various devices without needing to rent a set-top box from their cable company and without buying equipment that is compatible with a physical CableCard.

One possibility is that new set-top boxes could combine online video sources with cable TV channels.

The proposal has been criticized by cable companies and Republicans. Critics say it would force cable companies to build new hardware and require customers to rent even more boxes. They also say the proposal would let third-party set-top box makers insert their own advertising into pay-TV content and undermine programming agreements between programmers and pay-TV companies.

Wheeler accused proponents of spreading misinformation.

"Nothing in this item requires a second box in the home," he said. "There is nothing in here that allows third parties to disaggregate cable content or sell advertising around it... It takes the same system that goes to the cable box today with the same structures and moves it through a different box requiring the same structures. As a result, existing copyrights and programming agreements are unaffected, consumer privacy is protected, emergency alerts are passed through and child protection laws are unaffected. Nothing in this proposal slows down or stops cable innovation."

Wheeler said the new rule will prohibit makers of set-top boxes and apps from putting extra advertising around pay-TV content.

Pay-TV companies will be required to deliver a few information streams to makers of other set-top boxes and apps. They include channel listings, video-on-demand lineups, information about what a device is allowed to do with content (such as recording), and the actual programming consumers are entitled to receive. Customers would still need a cable TV subscription for this to work.

Pay-TV companies would have two years to comply.


More: arstechnica.com/business


Also: .Wired
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FCC votes to “unlock the cable box” over Republican opposition (Original Post) Stellar Mar 2016 OP
I'd love to simply be able to buy my hardware and not pay monthly rental fees for boxes. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2016 #1
I. Can't. WAIT!!!! nt MADem Mar 2016 #2
thank you Chairman Wheeler lunasun Mar 2016 #3
From: C-Span with Chairman Wheeler Stellar Mar 2016 #8
Thank you lunasun Mar 2016 #10
another reminder for the "two sides of the same coin" cannard about Dems and Repukes corkhead Mar 2016 #4
beat me to it by 1 minute saturnsring Mar 2016 #6
Time to utilize that "great minds think alike" cannard corkhead Mar 2016 #7
but but but that cant be cause both sides are the same the cons are against that means the dems saturnsring Mar 2016 #5
How about... Stellar Mar 2016 #9

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. I'd love to simply be able to buy my hardware and not pay monthly rental fees for boxes.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:20 PM
Mar 2016

Seems like a rip-off.

Stellar

(5,644 posts)
8. From: C-Span with Chairman Wheeler
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 02:56 PM
Mar 2016

It a Q&A. It's about an hour long. It can be viewed here on C-Span


corkhead

(6,119 posts)
4. another reminder for the "two sides of the same coin" cannard about Dems and Repukes
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:41 PM
Mar 2016

Don't get me wrong, they are more similar than I would like, but things like this show they are not completely the same.

 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
5. but but but that cant be cause both sides are the same the cons are against that means the dems
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 01:42 PM
Mar 2016

are against it too......how can this be what with you having a republican president

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Media»FCC votes to “unlock the ...