Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Media
Related: About this forumWhy can't Fox apologize? It won't back down even amid Pirro, Carlson controversies
Source: Washington Post
Why cant Fox apologize? It wont back down even amid Pirro, Carlson controversies
By Paul Farhi and Sarah Ellison
March 11 at 5:30 PM
Fox News has no regrets and no remorse. It isnt sorry.
Faced with yet another uproar actually, two of them within 24 hours the cable network has blandly, mildly offered . . . well, very little in response. No apologies, no promises of reform, no retreat, no surrender.
The nonresponse appears almost to be a strategy, a resistance in the face of controversy that has helped Fox define itself as a different, defiantly polarizing brand. Its double-down approach seems parallel to that of President Trump, whose political career has been boosted for years by Fox.
The latest Fox uproar involves prime-time host Tucker Carlson, whose vulgar comments about women, girls and a polygamous cult leader on a syndicated radio program more than a decade ago spurred outrage when they were released Sunday by Media Matters for America, a liberal watchdog group and longtime Fox nemesis.
In response, Carlson issued a brief statement dismissing any controversy; he allowed that his comments were naughty and invited critics to come on his program to debate him an attempt to turn lemons into Nielsen ratings.
-snip-
By Paul Farhi and Sarah Ellison
March 11 at 5:30 PM
Fox News has no regrets and no remorse. It isnt sorry.
Faced with yet another uproar actually, two of them within 24 hours the cable network has blandly, mildly offered . . . well, very little in response. No apologies, no promises of reform, no retreat, no surrender.
The nonresponse appears almost to be a strategy, a resistance in the face of controversy that has helped Fox define itself as a different, defiantly polarizing brand. Its double-down approach seems parallel to that of President Trump, whose political career has been boosted for years by Fox.
The latest Fox uproar involves prime-time host Tucker Carlson, whose vulgar comments about women, girls and a polygamous cult leader on a syndicated radio program more than a decade ago spurred outrage when they were released Sunday by Media Matters for America, a liberal watchdog group and longtime Fox nemesis.
In response, Carlson issued a brief statement dismissing any controversy; he allowed that his comments were naughty and invited critics to come on his program to debate him an attempt to turn lemons into Nielsen ratings.
-snip-
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/why-cant-fox-apologize-it-wont-back-down-even-amid-pirro-carlson-controversies/2019/03/11/447cbee4-4417-11e9-aaf8-4512a6fe3439_story.html
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why can't Fox apologize? It won't back down even amid Pirro, Carlson controversies (Original Post)
Eugene
Mar 2019
OP
Laura Ingraham told a black man to "shut up and dribble" and she's still there.
Power 2 the People
Mar 2019
#2
C_U_L8R
(45,762 posts)1. It's like a defect amongst Republicans
There are totally incapable of apology or remorse (unless they're feeling sorry for themselves)
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)2. Laura Ingraham told a black man to "shut up and dribble" and she's still there.
It isn't about journalism or profit at Fox. It is about spreading misinformation at all costs.
ScratchCat
(2,468 posts)3. Its simple once you understand the mindset of the right
Everything is "two sides" to them, and they decided long ago that "conservatives" are the "good guys". So If they face a situation where their side is to be seen as "wrong" or the "bad guy", then that would automatically have to mean that "the left" is "right" or "the good guy". It really is that simple to them. They can't ever admit someone on their side is "wrong" or "the bad guy" because it destroys the entire construct of "Conservatives good, Liberals evil". Again, it is that simple.
mitch96
(14,758 posts)4. I think for them an apology is a sign of weakness.. nt
GeorgeGist
(25,452 posts)5. Murdoch is a sociopath.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)6. Because it's a propaganda network. It doesn't care about truth or ethics