And to repeat for the millionth time, if it were genocide there would be no Gazans alive. Israel has that capability.
And, by the way, I totally disapprove of the Israeli government's actions.

Also, genocide wasn't the only term the NYT is accused of forbidding in its coverage of Gaza. Many of the rest are seriously ridiculous.


The US has a long track record of not recognising genocide, Rwanda being a good example. Once they acknowledge a genocide is happening, they're at least morally obligated to take action as the US is a signatory to the Genocide Convention. And that doesn't suit the US in most cases.

Also, if you've repeated that a million times, why hasn't anyone told you yr wrong? Was every last Armenian, European Jew, Cambodian, or Tutsi murdered?

Here's the meaning of genocide from the Holocaust Museum. I've bolded the bit you need to take notice of.

Genocide is an internationally recognized crime where acts are committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group.

https://www.ushmm.org/genocide-prevention/learn-about-genocide-and-other-mass-atrocities/what-is-genocide

I'm going to do a search and see if those words are avoided, and if that's the case I'll cancel my subscription and replace it with the Guardian, which also happens to have a very good Australian edition. Win win