often ridiculous spelling and grammatical errors... Editors don't exist there, apparently (but don't dare mention that in comments--or go ahead, but don't expect it to appear)

calories, either - but a two-minute google reveals that a large McD fry is 154g and 500 calories (a kid size is 31g and 100 cal)

Since the mega-size is 340g, I guess that would be roughly 1100 calories.

Which is, indeed, a lot.

http://nutrition.mcdonalds.com/getnutrition/nutritionfacts.pdf

Why doesn't the article say that? After all that is what the headline is about? .......well it is the Huffington Post..that is what I expect from them.
.I am no expert on the media I know a little, but I guess I expected more from an article about calories. Oh well..thanks for the research..

seems to be a dying art, so I'm never surprised by what isn't in an article anymore (sadly).

It really seemed to bug you, though - so I figured a quick trip to the numbers wouldn't hurt (and I have those marked, so it wasn't a big deal - reading those occasionally is a good way to remind myself that my craving for a sausage biscuit isn't worth the calories!)

Calling FOX a news organization.