Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
Fri Apr 26, 2019, 04:27 AM Apr 2019

F-35 Parts Problems At Heart Of Low Readiness Rates: GAO

https://breakingdefense.com/2019/04/f-35-parts-problems-at-heart-of-low-readiness-rates-gao/?_ga=2.126591109.96834923.1556270300-1385115421.1501579770

F-35 Parts Problems At Heart Of Low Readiness Rates: GAO

By Colin Clark
on April 25, 2019 at 6:13 PM

WASHINGTON: The F-35 program has faced enormous challenges over the years, but the biggest today is particularly intractable: The program simply can’t keep the flow of parts moving around the world in the numbers and places necessary.

How bad is it? “F-35 aircraft performance is falling short of warfighter requirements—that is, aircraft cannot perform as many missions or fly as often as required. This lower-than-desired aircraft performance is due largely to F-35 spare parts shortages and difficulty in managing and moving parts around the world,” the Government Accountability Office said in a compelling report today. “F-35 aircraft were unable to fly nearly 30 percent of the May-November 2018 time period due to spare parts shortages. Also, the Department of Defense (DOD) had a repair backlog of about 4,300 F-35 parts.”

Former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis established a goal of 80 percent readiness for all US tactical aircraft. Lockheed Martin has pledged to meet that goal and is pouring $180 million of its own money into the computerized system known as ALIS — meant to make to F-35 planning and parts management more efficient but actually an albatross for maintainers and aircrews — to bring things back on track.
(snip)

Meanwhile, the Joint Strike Fighter program has built a system to supply the US and allies with parts, but it just doesn’t the job well enough, the GAO found. “DoD purchases certain sets of F-35 parts years ahead of time to support aircraft on deployments, including on ships. But the parts do not fully match the military services’ needs because F-35 aircraft have been modified over time. For example, 44 percent of purchased parts were incompatible with aircraft the Marine Corps took on a recent deployment.” (Emphasis ours).

And things may not get much better for a while: “Without a detailed plan for the network, DOD may not be ready to support an expanding fleet.”
(snip)
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
F-35 Parts Problems At Heart Of Low Readiness Rates: GAO (Original Post) nitpicker Apr 2019 OP
This program has been a Sherman A1 Apr 2019 #1
It has its good points: Pilots LOVE it. But the issue is Loki Liesmith Apr 2019 #3
All well and good Sherman A1 Apr 2019 #4
You'll notice I never made any argument about that Loki Liesmith Apr 2019 #6
I don't disagree with your logic Sherman A1 Apr 2019 #7
A graph in the article nitpicker Apr 2019 #2
Even the goals which aren't being achieved Sherman A1 Apr 2019 #5

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
3. It has its good points: Pilots LOVE it. But the issue is
Fri Apr 26, 2019, 05:00 AM
Apr 2019

that different services have different requirements and the whole plane has to be made like a lego sculpture with swappable components for each service or country that uses it. This is what’s at the root of the parts problem: the desire to have a single plane that can satisfy service’s distinct requirements.

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
6. You'll notice I never made any argument about that
Fri Apr 26, 2019, 05:35 AM
Apr 2019

At this point, though, the costs are sunk. The government has decided it wants a joint strike fighter. This is what happens when you require a JSF. So we either muddle through or scrap it and start on another JSF and wind up with another program that overruns.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
7. I don't disagree with your logic
Fri Apr 26, 2019, 05:54 AM
Apr 2019

I believe that we could and should do better than this thing. I am old enough to remember the F-111 project as a development towards a joint strike fighter and it being replaced by the F4 Phantom built not far from where I lived.

I believe we would be far better off replacing aging airframes of our current generation of aircraft and looking towards the use of unmanned units.

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
2. A graph in the article
Fri Apr 26, 2019, 04:36 AM
Apr 2019

Says there are goals for 60% and 75% of the F-35s to be fully mission-capable and able to do at least one mission, respectively.

GAO found that from May to November 2018, the actual percentages were 27% and 52%.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»F-35 Parts Problems At He...