F-35 Parts Problems At Heart Of Low Readiness Rates: GAO
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/04/f-35-parts-problems-at-heart-of-low-readiness-rates-gao/?_ga=2.126591109.96834923.1556270300-1385115421.1501579770F-35 Parts Problems At Heart Of Low Readiness Rates: GAO
By Colin Clark
on April 25, 2019 at 6:13 PM
WASHINGTON: The F-35 program has faced enormous challenges over the years, but the biggest today is particularly intractable: The program simply cant keep the flow of parts moving around the world in the numbers and places necessary.
How bad is it? F-35 aircraft performance is falling short of warfighter requirementsthat is, aircraft cannot perform as many missions or fly as often as required. This lower-than-desired aircraft performance is due largely to F-35 spare parts shortages and difficulty in managing and moving parts around the world, the Government Accountability Office said in a compelling report today. F-35 aircraft were unable to fly nearly 30 percent of the May-November 2018 time period due to spare parts shortages. Also, the Department of Defense (DOD) had a repair backlog of about 4,300 F-35 parts.
Former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis established a goal of 80 percent readiness for all US tactical aircraft. Lockheed Martin has pledged to meet that goal and is pouring $180 million of its own money into the computerized system known as ALIS meant to make to F-35 planning and parts management more efficient but actually an albatross for maintainers and aircrews to bring things back on track.
(snip)
Meanwhile, the Joint Strike Fighter program has built a system to supply the US and allies with parts, but it just doesnt the job well enough, the GAO found. DoD purchases certain sets of F-35 parts years ahead of time to support aircraft on deployments, including on ships. But the parts do not fully match the military services needs because F-35 aircraft have been modified over time. For example, 44 percent of purchased parts were incompatible with aircraft the Marine Corps took on a recent deployment. (Emphasis ours).
And things may not get much better for a while: Without a detailed plan for the network, DOD may not be ready to support an expanding fleet.
(snip)
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)disaster from Day 1.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)that different services have different requirements and the whole plane has to be made like a lego sculpture with swappable components for each service or country that uses it. This is whats at the root of the parts problem: the desire to have a single plane that can satisfy services distinct requirements.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)As we bankrupt the budget building the thing.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)At this point, though, the costs are sunk. The government has decided it wants a joint strike fighter. This is what happens when you require a JSF. So we either muddle through or scrap it and start on another JSF and wind up with another program that overruns.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)I believe that we could and should do better than this thing. I am old enough to remember the F-111 project as a development towards a joint strike fighter and it being replaced by the F4 Phantom built not far from where I lived.
I believe we would be far better off replacing aging airframes of our current generation of aircraft and looking towards the use of unmanned units.
nitpicker
(7,153 posts)Says there are goals for 60% and 75% of the F-35s to be fully mission-capable and able to do at least one mission, respectively.
GAO found that from May to November 2018, the actual percentages were 27% and 52%.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Are far too low.