Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,626 posts)
Fri Oct 25, 2019, 09:17 PM Oct 2019

Key Witness in Impeachment Inquiry, Charles Kupperman, Asks Federal Court to Rule Over Testifying

Credit to The Last Word for the heads-up

______________________________________________________________________

Source: New York Times

Key Witness in Impeachment Inquiry Asks Federal Court to Rule Over Testifying

The move raises new doubts about whether President Trump’s closest aides will be able to cooperate with the inquiry.


By Michael S. Schmidt
Oct. 25, 2019
Updated 10:09 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON — A key witness in the impeachment investigation filed a lawsuit Friday asking a federal judge to rule on whether he can testify, a move that raises new doubts about whether President Trump’s closest aides, like the former national security adviser, John R. Bolton, will be able to cooperate with the inquiry.

House Democrats had subpoenaed the witness, Charles M. Kupperman, who served as Mr. Trump’s deputy national security adviser, to testify on Monday. But in an effort to stop Mr. Kupperman from doing so, the White House said on Friday that the president had invoked “constitutional immunity,” leaving Mr. Kupperman uncertain about what to do.

“Plaintiff obviously cannot satisfy the competing demands of both the legislative and executive branches, and he is aware of no controlling judicial authority definitively establishing which branch’s command should prevail,” the suit said.

The implications of the suit, filed in federal court in Washington, extend beyond Mr. Kupperman. His lawyer, Charles J. Cooper, also represents Mr. Bolton and is likely to address congressional requests for his testimony in a similar fashion. House Democrats have had discussions with Mr. Cooper in recent days about Mr. Bolton testifying but have not subpoenaed him.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/25/us/politics/kupperman-subpoena-impeachment-trump.html
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Key Witness in Impeachment Inquiry, Charles Kupperman, Asks Federal Court to Rule Over Testifying (Original Post) Eugene Oct 2019 OP
So torn on this Jake Stern Oct 2019 #1

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
1. So torn on this
Fri Oct 25, 2019, 10:18 PM
Oct 2019

We NEED their testimony but on the other hand if the courts rule Congress can compel testimony despite assertions of privilege by the Executive then what's to stop a future GOP led House or Senate from issuing subpoenas like parking tickets to a Dem president's closest advisers.

It's a great deal like the infamous "nuclear option". I understand why Senator Reid did it, but it opened the door for a horde of ultra RW judges.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»Key Witness in Impeachmen...