HASC Rejects Base Closure, F-35 Restrictions During NDAA Markup
http://breakingdefense.com/2013/06/05/hasc-rejects-base-closure-f-35-restrictions-during-ndaa-markup/
Amendments stack up on the desks of House Armed Services Committee members at their markup of the 2014 defense bill.
HASC Rejects Base Closure, F-35 Restrictions During NDAA Markup
By Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. on June 05, 2013 at 5:12 PM
[updated with final results] CAPITOL HILL: Bipartisan majorities in the House Armed Services Committee have steamrollered proposals to slow down the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and to permit the Pentagon to plan for base closures, but reformers at least made a respectable run at the windmill during markup of fiscal year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).
The one and only rule is, my district cant be reduced by anything, (which means)] we wind up paralyzed, said HASCs most senior Democrat, Washington Rep. Adam Smith, in a characteristically acerbic moment. With the $52 billion-a-year cuts known as sequestration in the offing, he said, I dont think this committee has the luxury to be so darn parochial anymore.
The HASC vote came one day after nine think tanks banded together in large part of convince Congress that it must accept a round of base closure and realignment, or BRAC. One expert at the Capitol HIll gathering, Mackenzie Eaglen of the American Enterprise Institute, argued that Congress must consider closing bases in the United States, where the Pentagon estimates it has 20 percent excess capacity. Eaglen cautioned against the trend on Capitol Hill to call for first closing foreign bases, which, of course, dont have lots of congressional constituents. Its a nice convenient thing. It plays well at home, she said, but its terribly destructive. In a budgetary war game played by the think tanks, she said, they had actually added money for overseas bases.
The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter vote demonstrated how powerful domestic constituencies can be. Its backed by the three armed services that buy jets albeit with different degrees of enthusiasm from the Marines (most pro-F-35) to the Navy (least) and it supports jobs in 47 states. So the surprise isnt that 51 committee members from both parties voted against Illinois Democrat Tammy Duckworths amendment to slow the program until the next installment of its complex software is fully verified and tested. The surprise was that nine other members joined Duckworth in voting aye, actually breaking (barely) into double digits.