Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 10:33 AM Oct 2013

Why Washington Just Can’t Stop Making War

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/10/22-6



As the US military builds the most sophisticated (and expensive) 'blowback machine' in world history, Engelhardt explores the age-old question: What planet are we living on?

Why Washington Just Can’t Stop Making War
by Tom Engelhardt
Published on Tuesday, October 22, 2013 by TomDispatch.com

In terms of pure projectable power, there’s never been anything like it. Its military has divided the world -- the whole planet -- into six “commands.” Its fleet, with 11 aircraft carrier battle groups, rules the seas and has done so largely unchallenged for almost seven decades. Its Air Force has ruled the global skies, and despite being almost continuously in action for years, hasn’t faced an enemy plane since 1991 or been seriously challenged anywhere since the early 1970s. Its fleet of drone aircraft has proven itself capable of targeting and killing suspected enemies in the backlands of the planet from Afghanistan and Pakistan to Yemen and Somalia with little regard for national boundaries, and none at all for the possibility of being shot down. It funds and trains proxy armies on several continents and has complex aid and training relationships with militaries across the planet. On hundreds of bases, some tiny and others the size of American towns, its soldiers garrison the globe from Italy to Australia, Honduras to Afghanistan, and on islands from Okinawa in the Pacific Ocean to Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. Its weapons makers are the most advanced on Earth and dominate the global arms market. Its nuclear weaponry in silos, on bombers, and on its fleet of submarines would be capable of destroying several planets the size of Earth. Its system of spy satellites is unsurpassed and unchallenged. Its intelligence services can listen in on the phone calls or read the emails of almost anyone in the world from top foreign leaders to obscure insurgents. The CIA and its expanding paramilitary forces are capable of kidnapping people of interest just about anywhere from rural Macedonia to the streets of Rome and Tripoli. For its many prisoners, it has set up (and dismantled) secret jails across the planet and on its naval vessels. It spends more on its military than the next most powerful 13 states combined. Add in the spending for its full national security state and it towers over any conceivable group of other nations.

"Wherever U.S. military power has been applied in recent years, if there has been any lasting effect at all, it has been to destabilize whole regions."

In terms of advanced and unchallenged military power, there has been nothing like the U.S. armed forces since the Mongols swept across Eurasia. No wonder American presidents now regularly use phrases like “the finest fighting force the world has ever known” to describe it. By the logic of the situation, the planet should be a pushover for it. Lesser nations with far lesser forces have, in the past, controlled vast territories. And despite much discussion of American decline and the waning of its power in a “multi-polar” world, its ability to pulverize and destroy, kill and maim, blow up and kick down has only grown in this new century.

No other nation's military comes within a country mile of it. None has more than a handful of foreign bases. None has more than two aircraft carrier battle groups. No potential enemy has such a fleet of robotic planes. None has more than 60,000 special operations forces. Country by country, it’s a hands-down no-contest. The Russian (once “Red”) army is a shadow of its former self. The Europeans have not rearmed significantly. Japan’s “self-defense” forces are powerful and slowly growing, but under the U.S. nuclear “umbrella.” Although China, regularly identified as the next rising imperial state, is involved in a much-ballyhooed military build-up, with its one aircraft carrier (a retread from the days of the Soviet Union), it still remains only a regional power.

Despite this stunning global power equation, for more than a decade we have been given a lesson in what a military, no matter how overwhelming, can and (mostly) can’t do in the twenty-first century, in what a military, no matter how staggeringly advanced, does and (mostly) does not translate into on the current version of planet Earth.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Washington Just Can’t Stop Making War (Original Post) unhappycamper Oct 2013 OP
But, even w/all of this, 19 Muslims, directed from a cave, can attack the heart of the USA. Mika Oct 2013 #1
Summed up: The US refuses to acknowledge that war creates more trouble than it solves. DetlefK Oct 2013 #2
Not quite zipplewrath Oct 2013 #3
There's a lot of waste in the military. Interesting article AnotherMcIntosh Oct 2013 #4

DetlefK

(16,451 posts)
2. Summed up: The US refuses to acknowledge that war creates more trouble than it solves.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 10:59 AM
Oct 2013

The argument about Libya is faulty though: Those air-raids were carried out by international forces.

zipplewrath

(16,690 posts)
3. Not quite
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:13 AM
Oct 2013

They do pretty well, but like so many, they let the hyperbole get to themselves.

Its weapons makers are the most advanced on Earth and dominate the global arms market.
...
Its system of spy satellites is unsurpassed and unchallenged.


There are two dominant arms markets. Western arms, which we dominate for sure, and then there is the whole China/Russia/N.Korea market place (with additional actors) that basically serveces anyone we won't. Syria right now is accessing that other market through Russia. And there is a private market that ultimately services markets out of Western Europe (frequently Germany).

And our satellite system is threatened by recently developed systems of China. It is rapidly becoming an assumption that in any battle with China, we would lose much of our GPS capability straight away. Europe is also working on their own GPS constellation as well.

We spend our defense dollars stupidly, and we utilze that capability even worse. We could and should spend vastly less, and use it vastly less as well.
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
4. There's a lot of waste in the military. Interesting article
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:36 AM
Oct 2013

but it looks like they imposed a photoshopped Cruise missile on a photo of a WW II New Mexico-class battleship (with a wooden deck) instead of using a photo of Virginia class guided-missile cruiser.

The USS Mississippi (BB-41/AG-128) saw service in WWII. The USS Mississippi (CGN-40) was commissioned as guided-missile cruiser and later sold as scrap.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»Why Washington Just Can’t...