Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

white cloud

(2,567 posts)
Mon May 26, 2014, 11:08 AM May 2014

VoteVets Chair Jon Soltz: Critics Demanding Shinseki Resignation Are ‘Hypocrites’

http://www.nationalmemo.com/vote-vets-chair-jon-soltz-critics-demanding-shinseki-resignation-hypocrites/

Soltz: The only veterans organization making that demand is the American Legion. Nobody else has, other than the American Legion. I find that hypocritical because they supported a bill that was in the Senate – the $21 billion veterans package sponsored by Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) – and it was stopped by [Senate Minority Leader] Mitch McConnell (R-KY), yet they haven’t called for Mitch McConnell to resign. So there’s obviously a lot of partisan politics here. The issue with General Shinseki is [that] he was right about the Iraq War. It’s sort of unconscionable to fire somebody who is now trying to clean up the mess that was left by a prior administration: All of these new Iraq and Afghanistan veterans were not created by Barack Obama and his administration. When you look at the claims on the system and the role that has been played by Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, I think it’s rather ironic that they’re calling for the head of General Shinseki, who has been a reformer at the VA, and has opened up the claims process to so many more veterans – I find that completely hypocritical.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
VoteVets Chair Jon Soltz: Critics Demanding Shinseki Resignation Are ‘Hypocrites’ (Original Post) white cloud May 2014 OP
Wasn't the whole purpose of "keeping separate books" to keep "higher ups" in the dark? Viva_Daddy May 2014 #1
Top 8 Ways Companies Cook the Books DhhD May 2014 #2
This in NO ways describes anything that the VA does. Government and Private Business are different. DhhD May 2014 #3
Yes! Victor_c3 May 2014 #4

Viva_Daddy

(785 posts)
1. Wasn't the whole purpose of "keeping separate books" to keep "higher ups" in the dark?
Mon May 26, 2014, 12:40 PM
May 2014

Short note to Faux News: "Keeping a separate set of books" was a technique invented by the PRIVATE SECTOR, not Government.

DhhD

(4,695 posts)
3. This in NO ways describes anything that the VA does. Government and Private Business are different.
Mon May 26, 2014, 06:28 PM
May 2014

Victor_c3

(3,557 posts)
4. Yes!
Tue May 27, 2014, 09:12 AM
May 2014

The purpose of private business is to make profit. The purpose of government is to serve people.

Government might not always get it right 100% of the time, but I'll put my faith in government any day before I put it in a private business.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Veterans»VoteVets Chair Jon Soltz:...