Veterans
Related: About this forumWhite House: U.S. Can't Afford Veterans' Health Care Without Cuts
Last year, the Trump administration insisted that its regressive tax cuts were so important, it was worth adding $1.5 trillion to the national debt to ensure their passage. Now, the White House is warning Congress that the United States cannot afford to add $1.6 billion to the deficit to expand health-care options for veterans.
In a letter Monday, the Trump administration demanded that lawmakers fund a popular veterans health-care program which allows former troops to spend public funds on private doctors and hospitals with cuts to other parts of the budget. Democrats, and some top Senate Republicans, prefer to raise the current caps on discretionary spending instead.
The case for the latter option is straightforward. Congressional spending falls into two categories: mandatory (funding for programs like Social Security, which increases automatically as more Americans qualify for benefits) and discretionary (spending that Congress must actively renew). When Congress passed its omnibus budget bill back in March, the private veterans health-care program was on the mandatory side of the ledger. Thus, although lawmakers knew that federal spending on the program was going to increase, they didnt have to account for its cost when setting a discretionary budget.
But last month, president Trump signed a law that reorganized veterans health care, and shifted funding for the private program into the discretionary column. This did not significantly increase the overall cost of domestic spending but it did lift the price tag on the discretionary budget above previously set caps. Which is to say: It produced a budget shortfall that wasnt a product of changes in fiscal reality, so much as in accounting practices.
Thus, Democrats and Senate Republicans like Alabamas Richard Shelby have favored just lifting the caps. After all, lawmakers already need to resolve a host of other contentious budgetary issues between now and October, if they are to avoid a shutdown on midterms eve. Relitigating funding levels for various domestic programs which Congress had found consensus on just months ago is not a fight that most lawmakers want to have.
more... http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/07/trump-u-s-cant-afford-veterans-health-care-without-cuts.html
Great, so much for his promise to Veterans.. FUCKING NASTY asshole..
![](/du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
TexasTowelie
(118,762 posts)He drank too much of the Kool-Aid.
Cartaphelius
(868 posts)afford to care for the men and women they choose to send into
service to America as "needed", they cannot afford to go to war, or turn service
members into "peace keepers".
atreides1
(16,506 posts)His base don't give two shits about veterans...they're just like him...pay a lot of lip service but they all have the same signs in their yards:
DOGS AND VETERANS, KEEP OFF THE GRASS!!!
As a veteran my view is...if you continue to support Trump, you don't give damn about vets! And those vets that support Trump, there is a name for them...QUISLING!!!!
yuiyoshida
(43,193 posts)so they can use those for his rich friends when they get old...I hate this asshole!
C_U_L8R
(46,193 posts)Clearly its not a priority to republicans
Varaddem
(433 posts)yuiyoshida
(43,193 posts)filling the oval office....we need a tar and feather crew!!
Varaddem
(433 posts)I was too angry to post anything else. My rant started with ... support the troops? It got ugly
The River
(2,615 posts)The Koch Bro's have been pushing this for some time.
After they screw vets they want to go after SS and Medicare and screw the elderly too.
These Republicans need to go.