Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 09:35 PM Aug 2017

AF-AM Group: At what point should an entertainer give him/herself up to financial servitude?

Recently, the mention of Beyonce buying a 90 mil has caused a lot of "concern" among certain DUers who feel it could have been spent on other social causes and a few that are concerned that someone could make that much money.

So my question is, at what point should Beyonce stop taking a percentage of the proceeds of her various products and start doing stuff without receiving compensation (Mhmm, I think there was a word for that.)?

Forbes places her at 340m in income this year, a chunk of which comes from her extremely successful 250mil Formation World Tour. So should she be a 240m slave, only being allowed to keep 100mil of her earned income or a modest 300m slave? How much of their hard earned income are the descendants of slaves allowed to keep in America before being cast back into servitude?

It's a serious question. I support liberal policies, but on the otherhand, the moment I'm paying more than 50% of my income in taxes, I'm going to be rallying for a huge change in direction in the party. I personally refuse to work for less than a majority of my income and frankly, it pisses me off when DU goes on a tizzy about a black performer or our president (President Obama) making exactly what the market will pay them for their services.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AF-AM Group: At what point should an entertainer give him/herself up to financial servitude? (Original Post) SaschaHM Aug 2017 OP
Taxation as slavery? Billy Jingo Aug 2017 #1
I think that African Americans should get to keep a majority of the income that they make. SaschaHM Aug 2017 #2
No. I oppose using melanin for tax policy. Billy Jingo Aug 2017 #3
Post removed Post removed Aug 2017 #4
You really didn't think this through, did you? Billy Jingo Aug 2017 #5
Insults because a Black man would like to earn a majority of his income. SaschaHM Aug 2017 #6
Your insult was much greater, suggesting that the poster should be at Stormfront pnwmom Aug 2017 #7
I asked him a simple question. SaschaHM Aug 2017 #9
I think African Americans should pay the same tax rate as anyone else of the same income. pnwmom Aug 2017 #11
Of course, it doesn't make you racist. SaschaHM Aug 2017 #12
Someone who makes her kind of income pnwmom Aug 2017 #13
You consider that to be insulting? Billy Jingo Aug 2017 #8
Again with the insults? SaschaHM Aug 2017 #10
I haven't been on DU JustAnotherGen Aug 2017 #14
discussing tax policy is one thing. but these are aimed at usually minorities/women especially black JI7 Aug 2017 #15
This with a cherry on top JustAnotherGen Aug 2017 #16

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
2. I think that African Americans should get to keep a majority of the income that they make.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 09:46 PM
Aug 2017

Do you agree? I think coming from a history of not receiving any of it at all, 50+% of the income from our labor isn't a hard ask.

 

Billy Jingo

(77 posts)
3. No. I oppose using melanin for tax policy.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 09:56 PM
Aug 2017

By the way, would it be a sliding scale? Would there be some sort of melanin test where the greater the concentration the lower the tax rate?

I pity the Dutch. Other than freckles, they are pretty much boned.

Response to Billy Jingo (Reply #3)

pnwmom

(109,630 posts)
7. Your insult was much greater, suggesting that the poster should be at Stormfront
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 10:15 PM
Aug 2017

because the poster didn't think tax rate should be determined by race.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
9. I asked him a simple question.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 10:21 PM
Aug 2017

Did he think that African Americans should earn a majority of the income for their services?

He said no and then went on some tangent about melanin not determining tax policy. This is a low count poster that has in multiple posts brought up the "not about melanin" excuse to dismiss the racial aspects of something. Sorry, I'm not dealing with that shit.

pnwmom

(109,630 posts)
11. I think African Americans should pay the same tax rate as anyone else of the same income.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 10:31 PM
Aug 2017

That isn't a racist opinion.

But the top Federal income tax rate is 39.6%. Only people with high state and local taxes might pay more than 50%.

And an entertainer like Beyonce probably takes a lot of deductions before her income is taxed.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
12. Of course, it doesn't make you racist.
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 10:37 PM
Aug 2017

You haven't been pulling a "melanin is not the reason" card on DU and you have a history here.

And personally that is fine, but I'm not voting for any political candidate that ultimately has me paying more than 50%+ of my income in taxes. I refuse to work for less than a majority of my income, which tbh is still vastly smaller than what a corporation would make off of my labor.

Deductions aside, Beyonce is still probably paying a much larger amount of taxes than most of us on DU combined. The state property taxes on a 90mil house purchases is probably more than what many posters pay in a year.

pnwmom

(109,630 posts)
13. Someone who makes her kind of income
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 10:52 PM
Aug 2017

spends a much smaller proportion of income than the rest of us on basic expenses. So she can afford the taxes on the investments she makes.

I don't begrudge her her amazing income, but I'm also not worried about her having to pay the same tax rate as anyone else. And I think people with 90 million dollar homes should pay proportionately higher taxes. Even at 50% total income taxes (or whatever her amount is) she would still have more disposable income than the vast majority of people.

SaschaHM

(2,897 posts)
10. Again with the insults?
Fri Aug 18, 2017, 10:27 PM
Aug 2017

I don't have to be affected by the words of some anonymous poster looking to get internet points to realize that they're meant to be an insult.

JI7

(90,844 posts)
15. discussing tax policy is one thing. but these are aimed at usually minorities/women especially black
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 12:17 AM
Aug 2017

women. it's more about resentment than it is about tax policy. just look at the complaints about money she spends on giving birth. like WTF .

if it was about tax policy they the issue would be what her position is. i doubt she has a detailed view of it but she does vote for the more liberal party under which she would pay more taxes.

another thing is they got angry when i mentioned how lower income/working class white men vote republican and are more responsible for the tax policies that favor the wealthy.

JustAnotherGen

(33,785 posts)
16. This with a cherry on top
Sat Aug 19, 2017, 06:47 AM
Aug 2017


lower income/working class white men vote republican and are more responsible for the tax policies that favor the wealthy.


Amen.

My take? A lot of those guys voted for Trump out of resentment he gunned up against minorities of ALL socio-economic flavors.

They believe that only THEY work hard.
Only THEY are allowed to get rich in America.

Truth be told - if the Carters had 3 kids and needed tanf and snap to get by . . .they would be just as angry.
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»African American»AF-AM Group: At what poin...