Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
African American
Related: About this forumThe Source of Self-Regard: Toni Morrison on Wisdom in the Age of Information
This increasingly dangerous obfuscation of information and wisdom is what Toni Morrison (b. February 18, 1931) one of the deepest seers of our time examines in an almost-aside, the way only towering intellects can.
Morrison writes:
In all of our education, whether its in institutions or not, in homes or streets or wherever, whether its scholarly or whether its experiential, there is a kind of a progression. We move from data to information to knowledge to wisdom. And separating one from the other, being able to distinguish among and between them, that is, knowing the limitations and the danger of exercising one without the others, while respecting each category of intelligence, is generally what serious education is about. And if we agree that purposeful progression exists, then you will see that its easy, and its seductive, to assume that data is really knowledge. Or that information is, indeed, wisdom. Or that knowledge can exist without data. And how easy, and how effortlessly, one can parade and disguise itself as another. And how quickly we can forget that wisdom without knowledge, wisdom without any data, is just a hunch.
Reflecting on how she too had mistaken information for illumination in her initial approach to her subject a sort of arrogance she condemns as poison to both wisdom and imagination she writes:
[I had read] the historical books I had read the autobiographies of the slaves themselves and therefore had firsthand information from people who were there. You add that to my own intuition, and you can see the shape of my confidence and the trap that it would lead me into, which would be confusing data with information and knowledge with hunches and so on. I thought I knew a great deal about it. And that arrogance was the first obstacle.
What I needed was imagination to shore up the facts, the data, and not be overwhelmed by them. Imagination that personalized information, made it intimate, but didnt offer itself as a substitute. If imagination could be depended on for that, then there was the possibility of knowledge. Wisdom, of course, I would leave alone, and rely on the readers to produce that.
Morrison writes:
In all of our education, whether its in institutions or not, in homes or streets or wherever, whether its scholarly or whether its experiential, there is a kind of a progression. We move from data to information to knowledge to wisdom. And separating one from the other, being able to distinguish among and between them, that is, knowing the limitations and the danger of exercising one without the others, while respecting each category of intelligence, is generally what serious education is about. And if we agree that purposeful progression exists, then you will see that its easy, and its seductive, to assume that data is really knowledge. Or that information is, indeed, wisdom. Or that knowledge can exist without data. And how easy, and how effortlessly, one can parade and disguise itself as another. And how quickly we can forget that wisdom without knowledge, wisdom without any data, is just a hunch.
Reflecting on how she too had mistaken information for illumination in her initial approach to her subject a sort of arrogance she condemns as poison to both wisdom and imagination she writes:
[I had read] the historical books I had read the autobiographies of the slaves themselves and therefore had firsthand information from people who were there. You add that to my own intuition, and you can see the shape of my confidence and the trap that it would lead me into, which would be confusing data with information and knowledge with hunches and so on. I thought I knew a great deal about it. And that arrogance was the first obstacle.
What I needed was imagination to shore up the facts, the data, and not be overwhelmed by them. Imagination that personalized information, made it intimate, but didnt offer itself as a substitute. If imagination could be depended on for that, then there was the possibility of knowledge. Wisdom, of course, I would leave alone, and rely on the readers to produce that.
https://www.brainpickings.org/2019/03/06/the-source-of-self-regard-toni-morrison-wisdom-information/?mc_cid=1d875ee9e9&mc_eid=39ff8abb61
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Source of Self-Regard: Toni Morrison on Wisdom in the Age of Information (Original Post)
Kind of Blue
Mar 2019
OP
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)1. k&r for you and Ms. Morrison n/t
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)2. Aww, shucks. You're too kind. Thank you.
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)3. My pleasure, love the blues
Kind of Blue
(8,709 posts)4. Yes, indeed!