Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Star

(17,055 posts)
Mon Sep 5, 2016, 09:01 AM Sep 2016

No, the internet has not killed the printed book. Most people still prefer them.

Even with Facebook, Netflix and other digital distractions increasingly vying for time, Americans’ appetite for reading books — the ones you actually hold in your hands — has not slowed in recent years, according to a study by the Pew Research Center.

Sixty-five percent of adults in the United States said they had read a printed book in the past year, the same percentage that said so in 2012. When you add in e-books and audiobooks, the number that said they had read a book in printed or electronic format in the past 12 months fell to 73 percent, compared with 74 percent in 2012.

Twenty-eight percent said they had opted for an e-book in the past year, while 14 percent said they had listened to an audiobook.

http://www.boston.com/news/books/2016/09/04/no-the-internet-has-not-killed-the-printed-book-most-people-still-prefer-them

Count me in the printed book category now that I am retired. I use to also like audiobooks when I had a long drive to work back in the day.

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No, the internet has not killed the printed book. Most people still prefer them. (Original Post) Little Star Sep 2016 OP
Me too shenmue Sep 2016 #1
You can share printed books, and that's half the fun ... Auggie Sep 2016 #2
Thanks for sharing that hermetic Sep 2016 #3
Oh, yes. PoindexterOglethorpe Sep 2016 #4
How's this for irony? hermetic Sep 2016 #5

hermetic

(8,604 posts)
3. Thanks for sharing that
Mon Sep 5, 2016, 12:00 PM
Sep 2016

encouraging news. Our little group here is certainly doing our part in keeping the printed book in vogue. Between the library and used-book stores I always have a printed book on the go. Plus I listen to an audio book most every day as I cook and clean. I have not, as yet, read a book on an electronic device. Someday, maybe.



PoindexterOglethorpe

(26,607 posts)
4. Oh, yes.
Tue Sep 6, 2016, 02:43 AM
Sep 2016

While I have no problem with those who like ebooks, I get mightily irritated with those who claim traditional books are dead. Several points here. One is that electronic formats have a limited life span. Far more limited than that of printed books. And If I buy a traditional book, I can pass it on to someone else. I can't do that with an ebook. Not to mention the possibility of an EMP. Look it up, those of you who don't know what it is.

I recently (at the WorldCon in Kansas City) sat in on a session about old books. The amazing and wonderful Ada Palmer passed around actual samples of papyrus and real copies of very old books for us to look at and touch. She assured us that what she was passing around weren't valuable, and could readily survive our handling. Nonetheless, it was completely fascinating.

Here's a factoid or two: papyrus lasts a few hundred years. Vellum (sheepskin) lasts a whole lot longer, as in we still are not at the end of the lifespan of vellum. There is not a single original manuscript of anything at all from Greek and Roman times. Every single thing we have is a copy.

Please, please read The Swerve by Stephen Greenblatt. It's nominally about the discovery of De Rerum Natura by Lucretius in 1417, but is about a lot of other things as well. The lost knowledge of the ancients. How knowledge is preserved or lost. The importance of monasteries in the preservation of ancient knowledge. How very little of ancient writings have come down to us.

I listened to this on a CD on a recent long drive, and I know I need to buy this book, and that I also need to find a copy of De Rerum Natura that I want to keep on my bookshelf.

Here's another delightful result of this: I was helping my son relocate as he'd been accepted into grad school in physics (trust me, he's incredibly smart) and I was telling him about The Swerve, because I'd just listened to it. As it happens, he had a copy of De Rerum Natura (On the Nature of Things) apparently from some long ago class. Because of what I'd learned from the book, I could open his copy at random, and read to him the most amazing passages. It's as if someone from the late 20th or early 21st century had been tossed back some 2,000 years, and had now decided to write up modern (as in 20th or 21st century) understanding of things like physics, only putting that knowledge into a form that those of that earlier era could understand. Trust me, it's a lot like this.

hermetic

(8,604 posts)
5. How's this for irony?
Tue Sep 6, 2016, 01:46 PM
Sep 2016

My library has The Nature of Things available, but only as an ebook. They do, though, have The Swerve which sounds marvelous. I love reading about The Renaissance.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Fiction»No, the internet has not ...