Sports
Related: About this forumThe ugly discourse surrounding Caitlin Clark
I learned how swiftly the Clarkies can turn an innocent observation into an offense, and how dicey it can be to cover Clark when she has a subpar game. After Clarks much-hyped professional debut, I wrote that Connecticut Sun guard DiJonai Carrington, a Black woman, stripped her clean at half court. Yet a male reader corrected me in an email that no, no, Clark was instead cross; checked [sic] by a so-called top defensive opponent like in the NHL. Another reader accused me of being racial which I assume is better than being racist because I dared to note Carringtons defense.
Carters flagrant foul, upgraded by the league the next day, only inflamed the hysteria from those either blinded by their affection for Clark, or too ignorant to understand how heated competition works.
Consider what that argument implies. That Clark has elevated the league so much that competitors, paid professionals, should send Clark thank-you notes before every tip-off, then spend the rest of the game ushering her to the paint for open layups. How many other athletes, in the history of mankind, have ever been criticized for competing too hard? And who on Earth would consider Barkley, who once told a female reporter, I dont hit women, but if I did, I would hit you, a thought leader on women? Or as he called WNBA players, these girls.
Others have uttered worse. Across social media, Carter has been called a thug, her appearance lampooned and her shoulder check viewed as not simply a flagrant foul committed on a basketball court in downtown Indianapolis, but an assault perpetrated on the southside of Chicago.
Clarks fans are engaging in these bigoted narratives, but so are the alarmists who have nothing better to do than to ruin womens basketball. It would be naive to think that Clark hasnt noticed this messiness swirling on social media and in major news outlets. Shes a pro, she has agency.
And power. She is not a minor, but rather an adult woman. And if this narrative that pits her against her Black peers makes her uncomfortable, then she needs to speak up and say so. Same goes for the Fever organization as soon as those in charge are done using their platform to complain that their golden ticket is getting bruised up.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2024/06/04/caitlin-clark-chennedy-carter/
DURHAM D
(32,835 posts)jimfields33
(18,837 posts)Social media clowns. Her endorsement deals and her love of the game keeps her above the riff raft. Shes doing it all right. Good on her.
elleng
(136,043 posts)How many other athletes, in the history of mankind, have ever been criticized for competing too hard?
RandySF
(70,614 posts)Ive seen social media posts complaining about not letting Indiana win.
FreeForm73
(110 posts)Since she entered the league, she has been treated like a scourge, not as someone who can help everyone!!
I don't understand the lack of logic here
RandySF
(70,614 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 4, 2024, 06:40 PM - Edit history (1)
it reached the point of her being called the n word.
questionseverything
(10,138 posts)Dr. Strange
(26,000 posts)Oh no, wait, that was Carter.
Funny thing is, Pat McAfee just apologized for calling Clark a "white bitch". He didn't even give her a cheap shot while her back was turned, and he's shown more remorse than Chennedy Carter.
elleng
(136,043 posts)please
questionseverything
(10,138 posts)If the womens league becomes the same it ruins the game
She should just join the 3 on 3 league and let womens bb go back to being invisible
Raven123
(6,037 posts)I admit I like Clark for what I have seen in her public statements, maturity and professionalism. Honestly, I dont get all the hype about her either. Seemed like outsized publicity , but she did set an NCAA record, so maybe thats it. Or maybe its because Iowa got to the finals for 2 consecutive years and fans got to see her play a lot. Whatever it is, nothing excuses Carter.
Hard fouls, some of which are flagrant intentionally and accidentally are a part of the game. Shoving a player in the back when you are not in a crowd trying to to get a tip or a rebound is dirty and could be dangerous as the fouled player is not prepared for that kind of contact. I dont know what Carter was thinking, but it doesnt belong in competitive sports.
I hope the WNBA takes a hard line on this behavior. Frankly. I dont watch certain NBA teams because they have players who repeatedly exhibit unsportsmanlike behavior. Wouldnt want the WNBA to let this nonsense continue
ProfessorGAC
(69,854 posts)It's as if the writer hasn't watched the games.
It's nor just the fouls. It's the needless glee in making her early career miserable with rough stuff.
Clark is a tough bird, and she'll suck it up, but if fans see 80s Pistons or 90s Knicks rought stuff, the new attraction to the WNBA may be short lived because it looks like personal vendettas are the priority.
It's a bad look, & the league office must get a handle on it.
Dr. Strange
(26,000 posts)Catchings, who spent 15 years with the Fever, talked about the foul on Clark during an interview with USA Today.
"The cheap shot, I dont agree with that, I dont agree with that, especially thats where injuries happen, Catchings said. The play itself was wrong. As a whole, we all have a responsibility to make sure that things like that dont happen, for anybody to get hit like that.
"From the league standpoint, you have to protect your players. The fact that the referees didnt take the time within the game to go and look at it, I was really surprised. I was at the game. I was really surprised that they didnt look at it and that they just kept it moving. Thats not a basketball play."
...
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/other/indiana-fever-legend-tamika-catchings-not-happy-with-treatment-of-caitlin-clark/ar-BB1nBNOM
ProfessorGAC
(69,854 posts)And, I know it's gone too far when the Sky coach said that was not something the team approves of and won't be tolerated, the 20 minutes later the offending player said she'd do it again & had no remorse.
It's personal & ugly & unacceptable, plus business stupid.