Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sl8

(16,245 posts)
Thu Apr 27, 2023, 05:54 AM Apr 2023

1983 Steinwinter Supercargo 2040 Cab is probably the strangest truck ever made

https://drivemag.com/news/1983-steinwinter-supercargo-2040-cab-is-probably-the-strangest-truck-ever-made/

1983 Steinwinter Supercargo 2040 Cab is probably the strangest truck ever made

Posted on JULY 14, 2017 by DAN MIHALAȘCU

Just what were they thinking?

Trying to revolutionize an industry is never easy, especially one that's as complex and far-reaching as the transport of goods on roads. But one man called Manfred Steinwinter tried to do just that not too long ago.

For as long as people have hauled goods on roads, trucks have largely had the same shape — with the improvements brought by each generation change, obviously. But what Mr. Steinwinter proposed in 1983 was a radical modification of a semi truck's tractor.



He believed that reducing the tractor's height would lead to significant fuel savings as well as an increase in the volume of transported freight. And that's how the shocking Steinwinter Supercargo 20.40 Cab concept came to life.

Unveiled at the 1983 Frankfurt Motor Show, the truck study featured a tractor unit that measured just 1,170 mm in height, covered completely by the trailer. The unusual design allowed for an 18-meter-long loading area and a total cargo volume of 150 cubic meters.

[...]

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
1983 Steinwinter Supercargo 2040 Cab is probably the strangest truck ever made (Original Post) sl8 Apr 2023 OP
When tested in a wind tunnel ... NT mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2023 #1
I see where they were going and I like it Layzeebeaver Apr 2023 #2
Are you True Dough Apr 2023 #3
Have to, to pay the physical therapy bills. sl8 Apr 2023 #5
Your slogan ought to be True Dough Apr 2023 #6
That'd be slick painted ... YDogg Apr 2023 #4
On the plus side, the trailer opens on both ends taxi Apr 2023 #7
Why? Where's the the streamling as that configuration... brush Apr 2023 #8
Everything old is new again. mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2023 #9
Very cool, thank you. nt sl8 Apr 2023 #10

Layzeebeaver

(1,866 posts)
2. I see where they were going and I like it
Thu Apr 27, 2023, 06:03 AM
Apr 2023

it just needed the addition of an inflatable aeroshell/nosecone on the front of the container to make it more streamlined.

Reminds me of airport traction/towing vehicles.

sl8

(16,245 posts)
5. Have to, to pay the physical therapy bills.
Thu Apr 27, 2023, 07:06 AM
Apr 2023

Fingers crossed - it's looking like I'll be able to stand upright again in a year or so.

taxi

(1,944 posts)
7. On the plus side, the trailer opens on both ends
Thu Apr 27, 2023, 09:02 AM
Apr 2023

allowing a straight in approach to loading docks, more versatile distribution of loads, and more flexibility in making numerous stops. On the negative side is the absence of landing gear - the legs that hold up the trailer when detached from the truck, the safety risk created by the diminished range of vision for the driver, and no sleeping quarters.
This truck would be well suited for local delivery but the lack of landing gear makes each truck less available for additional trips while loading. Also, while the range of vision could have been a problem in 1983, with the in-cab video available on today's vehicles that problem is lessened.


brush

(57,530 posts)
8. Why? Where's the the streamling as that configuration...
Thu Apr 27, 2023, 09:17 AM
Apr 2023

with the low cap/cargo box atop it will just gulp the wind head on and be hell on fuel economy?

It's 40 years since it was introduced. I haven't seen any on the road. Tremendous fail.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

mahatmakanejeeves

(60,963 posts)
9. Everything old is new again.
Fri Apr 28, 2023, 11:47 AM
Apr 2023
April 27, 2023 | Intermodal

PVJR, GEGI Partner on Autonomous Road/Rail Glīd

Written by William C. Vantuono, Editor-in-Chief



Portland Vancouver Junction Railroad (PVJR), a 33-mile Class III in Washington State, has entered a partnership with Salt Lake City-based tech startup Genesis Electronics Group Inc. (GEGI) to provide rail access to the company’s experimental autonomous battery-electric Glīd road/rail vehicle. Vancouver, Wash.-based trucking transportation and logistics company Taylor Transport is a participant in Glīd testing.

The Glīd is described as a vehicle “for moving unaltered semi-trailers on and off the rails.” Taylor Transport’s property has a rail spur directly connecting to the PVJR. GEGI signed a letter of intent with Taylor Transport in early April 2023. In October 2022, GEGI acquired Glīd, LLC, a Salt Lake City-based autonomous electric shipping technology firm.

Glīd is a wholly owned subsidiary of GEGI. Its technology is designed to enable “two specially made ‘Glīder’ vehicles to independently and autonomously move under an unaltered, fully loaded semi-trailer, connect to both the kingpin and rear axle, and then lift the trailer,” GEGI described. “Once the trailer is lifted off the ground, the Glīders, using a uniquely designed wheel system, will be able to access railroad tracks, deploy rail wheels [much like a hi-rail vehicle], and then transport the semi-trailer at speeds of up to 80 mph on battery power. Each Glīder would exit the rails onto a [facility] where a semi-tractor could then pick up the trailer and take it on the final leg of its destination.”

The PVJR/GEGI partnership is described as “the first in the U.S. to grant access to an autonomous electric vehicle to move unaltered semi-trailers on and off the rails.”

Glīd equipment and software can be resting while on the PVJR rail spur in Taylor Transport’s facilities. “Engineers will be able to test, observe and perform the necessary design and onsite modifications required to iterate and enhance its beta units for production deployment,” GEGI noted. “After certain testing standards have been met, the Glīd will be able to access longer stretches of PVJR track and begin to interface with its scheduling system as well as [determine compliance with FRA] safety standards. Meeting or exceeding [FRA] rail safety standards and system requirements is one of the highest priorities. The company wants to demonstrate that autonomous vehicles on the rails can be as safe if not safer than [crewed] locomotives. Working with PVJR will enable us to evaluate safety protocols in several environments and scenarios. Once the Glīd can demonstrate that it has passed these safety standards, we will have the opportunity to present this technology to other rail operators across the country, including Class I railroads.”



PVJR leases 33 miles of railroad from Clark County, Wash. between Vancouver and Chelatchie. Its interchange with BNSF (on BNSF’s Seattle Subdivision) is four miles north of Portland, Ore. in Vancouver, a short distance away from the Port of Portland and Port of Vancouver. The railroad also has access to I-5 and I-205.



PJVR shown in yellow at center-left on this OpenRailwayMap screen shot.

{snip}
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Automobile Enthusiasts»1983 Steinwinter Supercar...